`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and TrademarkOffice
`Address; COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`17/038,708
`
`09/30/2020
`
`Hiroshi YAHATA
`
`P61564
`
`9707
`
`125331
`
`7590
`
`01/20/2022
`
`Panasonic Intellectual Property Corporation
`of America c/o Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C.
`1950 Roland Clarke Place
`Reston, VA 20191
`
`EXAMINER
`
`ZHAO, DAQUAN
`
`ART UNIT
`2484
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`01/20/2022
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e-mail address(es):
`
`gbpatent @ gbpatent.com
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`
`
`
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`1-8 is/are pending in the application.
`)
`Claim(s)
`5a) Of the above claim(s) 3 and 6-8 is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`() Claim(s)__ is/are allowed.
`Claim(s) 1-2 and 4-5 is/are rejected.
`S)
`) © Claim(s)___is/are objected to.
`C] Claim(s
`are subjectto restriction and/or election requirement
`)
`S)
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you maybeeligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`http:/Awww.uspto.gov/patents/init_events/pph/index.jsp or send an inquiry to PPHfeedback@uspto.gov.
`
`) )
`
`Application Papers
`10)() The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`11)M The drawing(s) filed on 9/30/2020 is/are: a)¥) accepted or b)C) objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`12)[¥] Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d)or (f).
`Certified copies:
`c)() None ofthe:
`b)( Some**
`a) All
`1.2 Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`2.¥} Certified copies of the priority documents have beenreceived in Application No. 15/278,582.
`3.0.) Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been receivedin this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`* See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1)
`
`Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`2)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date 12/29/2020.
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3) (J Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`(Qj Other:
`
`4)
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mail Date 20220114
`
`Application No.
`Applicant(s)
`17/038,708
`YAHATAetal.
`
`Office Action Summary Art Unit|AIA (FITF) StatusExaminer
`DAQUAN ZHAO
`2484
`Yes
`
`
`
`-- The MAILING DATEofthis communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLYIS SET TO EXPIRE 3 MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available underthe provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply betimely filed after SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing
`date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133}.
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, evenif timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term
`adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`1) Responsive to communication(s) filed on 12/20/2021.
`C} A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/werefiled on
`
`2a)L) This action is FINAL. 2b)¥)This action is non-final.
`3)02 An election was madeby the applicant in responseto a restriction requirement set forth during the interview
`on
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`4\0) Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Exparte Quayle, 1935 C.D. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 17/038,708
`Art Unit: 2484
`
`Page 2
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`Notice of Pre-AlA or AIA Status
`
`1.
`
`The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013,
`
`is being examined
`
`under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA.
`
`Election/Restrictions
`
`2.
`
`Applicant's election without traverse of claims 1-2 and 4-5 in the reply filed on
`
`12/20/2021 is acknowledged.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
`
`3.
`
`The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that
`
`form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
`
`A person shall be entitled to a patent unless —
`
`(a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patentissued under section 151, orinan
`application for patent published or deemed published under s ection 122(b), in which the
`patentor application, as the case maybe, names anotherinventor and waseffectively filed
`before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
`
`4.
`
`Claims 1-2 and 4-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being described by
`
`Yamamoto et al (US 2016/0134832).
`
`For claim 1, Yamamoto et al teach a decoding system that decaxies a video
`
`stream, which is encoded video information, comprising:
`
`a decacier that acquires the video steam anc generates decoded video
`
`information by decoding the video siream (e.g. figure 2 or figure 4, “decoding
`
`processing’);
`
`a maximum hurinance information acquirer (¢.9. figure 2, “Pararneter extraction
`
`Grom SEQ") thal acquires, in a case where a dyriamic range of luminance of the video
`
`stream is a second dynamic range that is wider than a first dynamic range, maximum
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 17/038,708
`Art Unit: 2484
`
`Page 3
`
`luminance information indicating the maxinum fuminarice of the video strearn from the
`
`yideo stream (6.9. paragraphs 105-107: “in such a case the reproduce device 2 outputs,
`
`together with ihe data of the HDR viceo, data representing ine brightness characteristic
`
`of the masier HDR video to the display device 3°” HDA video has greater luminance than
`
`the STD video, so HOM has the Maximum fuminance in these two type of video}: and
`
`an outouiter that cutouts the decoded video information along with the maximum
`
`luminance information (2.g. see above},
`
`wherein,
`
`in a case where the dynamic range of luminance of the video stream is
`
`expressed by the maximum luminance of all pictures in the video strearn as the
`
`maximum luminance information (6.9. figure 13, Each “Gip” is a AV stream, paragraph
`
`107: “. when the display device 3 includes an HDR monitor, ihe reproduction device 2
`
`outputs the data of the HDA vicieo..."),
`
`the ouiputier cutouts the decoded video information, along with the maximum
`
`luminance infarmation indicating the maxirnum luminance of all pictures in the video
`
`stream (&.¢. paragraphs 105-107: “In such a case the reproduce device 2 ouiputs,
`
`together with the data of the HDR video, dala renresenting the brightness characteristic
`
`ci ihe master HDA video to the display device 2’ HDA video has greater Luminance than
`
`the STD video, so HDF has the Maxirnum lurninance in these two type of video).
`
`Claim 4 is relecied for the same reasons as discussed in claim 1 above.
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 17/038,708
`Art Unit: 2484
`
`Page 4
`
`For claim 2, Yamamoto ef al teach a decoding system thal decodes a video
`
`strearn, which is encoded video information, comprising:
`
`a decoder that acquires the video steam and generates decoded video
`
`information by decoding the video siream (e.g. figure 2 or figure 4, “decoding
`
`processing’):
`
`a maximum hurinance information acquirer (¢.9. figure 2, “Pararneter extraction
`
`Grom SER’)
`
`that acquires, in a case where a dynamic range of luminance of the video
`
`stream is a second dynamic range that is wider than 4 first dynamic range, maximum
`
`luminance information indicating the maximum fuminance of the wideo stream from the
`
`video stream (¢.g. paragraphs 105-107: “in such a case the reproduce device 2 outputs,
`
`tagether wilh ihe data af the HDR video, dala representing ihe brighiness characteristle
`
`of ihe masier HDR video to the display device 2° HD video has greater luminance than
`
`the STD video, so HOM has the Maximum fuminance in these two type of video); and
`
`an cutpuiter that outputs the cecodec video information along with the maximum
`
`luminance information (e.g. see above},
`
`wherein,
`
`in a case where the dynamic range of kaninance of the video strearn is
`
`expressed by maximum luminance of all pictures in the video stream and maximum
`
`luminance for each of groups made up of one or a plurality of pictures inclucied in the
`
`video stream, as the maximum luminance information (e.g. figure 13, Each “Clip” is a
`
`AY strearn, paragraon 107: "...wnen the display device S includes an HDA monitor, the
`
`reproduction device 2 outputs the data of the HDA vileo...”),
`
`the outpuiter outouis the decoded video information, along with the maximum
`
`luminance information indicating the maxirnum lurninance of all pictures in the video
`
`
`
`Application/Control Number: 17/038,708
`Art Unit: 2484
`
`Page 5
`
`slrearn and the maximum luminance for each of the groups (e.g. figure 13, each “clin”
`
`has an “AY stream’).
`
`Cigim 5 is relected for the same reason as discussed in claim 2 above.
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the
`
`examiner should be directed to DAQUAN ZHAO whose telephone numberis (571)270-
`
`1119 or email daquan.zhao1@uspto.gov.
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by
`
`telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Tran Thai Q, can be reached on
`
`(571)272-7382. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or
`
`proceeding is assigned is (571) 273-8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the
`
`Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for
`
`published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR.
`
`Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only.
`
`For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should
`
`you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic
`
`Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free).
`
`If you would like assistance from a
`
`USPTO CustomerService Representative or accessto the automated information
`
`system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
`
`/DAQUAN ZHAO/
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2484
`
`