throbber
Application No. 17/038,753
`
`Attorney Docket No. P61565
`
`REMARKS
`
`Initially, Applicant wishes to thank Primary Examiner Daquan Zhaofor the examination
`
`of the present patent application. Applicant would also like to thank the Examinerfor
`
`acknowledging Applicant’s claim for foreign priority, and that a certified copy of the priority
`
`document has been received in Applicant’s ancestor Application No 15/278,582. Additionally,
`
`Applicant would like to thank the Examiner for considering the materials provide in the
`
`Information Disclosure Statement, filed December 29, 2020, as evidenced by the Examiner-
`
`signed copies of the Information Disclosure Statement attached to the Official Action. Applicant
`
`would further like to thank the Examinerfor indicating that the drawings have been accepted.
`
`Summaryof the Official Action
`
`In the Official Action, the Examinerasserted the following rejection regarding
`
`Applicant’s pending claims 1-9:
`
`Claims 1-9 were rejected on the ground of non-statutory, double patenting as being
`
`unpatentable over claims 1-5 of Applicant’s U.S. Patent No. 10,255,951 B2 (the grandparent
`
`application).
`
`Summary of the Present Response to the Official Action
`
`In the present response to the Official Action, Applicant has concurrently filed an
`
`Electronic Terminal Disclaimer based on Applicant’s ancestor patent U.S. Patent No. 10,255,951
`
`B2. Thus, claims 1-9 are currently pending for reconsideration by the Examiner.
`
`{P61565 05113813.DOCX}
`2
`
`

`

`Application No. 17/038,753
`
`Attorney Docket No. P61565
`
`The Non-Statutory Double Patenting Rejection of Claims 1-9
`
`In the Official Action, claims 1-9 were rejected on the ground of non-statutory, double
`
`patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-5 of Applicant’s U.S. Patent No. 10,255,951 B2
`
`(the grandparent application). (See Official Action, pages 3-7.)
`
`In response to the non-statutory, double patenting rejection cited above, Applicant has
`
`concurrently filed an Electronic Terminal Disclaimer on January 6, 2022, which has been
`
`subsequently approved by the USPTO, to removeanyissue as to whetherthe claims of the
`
`present patent application and the claims of Applicant’s U.S. Patent No. 10,255,951 B2 in any
`
`way conflict. The filing of the Electronic Terminal Disclaimer thus removesthe above-cited
`
`rejection on the ground of non-statutory, double patenting in the present patent application.
`
`Applicant does not make any representation, however, as to whether any claims of the
`
`present patent application would have been obvious in view of the claims of the cited patent, if
`
`the Terminal Disclaimer was notfiled. The Terminal Disclaimer wasfiled only to expedite
`
`prosecution of the present patent application to allowance.
`
`Accordingly, Applicant respectfully requests that the above-cited rejection of pending
`
`claims 1-9 on the grounds of non-statutory, double patenting as being unpatentable over claims
`
`1-5 of U.S. Patent No. 10,255,951 B2 be withdrawn.
`
`{P61565 05113813.DOCX}
`3
`
`

`

`Application No. 17/038,753
`
`Attorney Docket No. P61565
`
`Conclusion
`
`In conclusion, Applicant respectfully submits that pending claims 1-9 satisfy all of the
`
`regulatory and statutory requirements for patentability for at least the reasons discussed above.
`
`Accordingly, Applicant respectfully requests that the non-statutory, double patenting rejection be
`
`withdrawn. Additionally, Applicant requests that an indication of the allowability of pending
`
`claims 1-9 be provided in the next Official communication.
`
`Finally, Applicant has madea sincere effort to place the present patent application in
`
`condition for allowance. Thus, if the Examiner believes that there are any outstanding issues that
`
`may be readily resolved through a telephonecall, including an Examiner ’s Amendment, the
`
`Examineris invited to call the undersigned at the telephone numberlisted at the end of this
`
`response.
`
`{P61565 05113813.DOCX}
`4
`
`

`

`Application No. 17/038,753
`
`Attorney Docket No. P61565
`
`SUMMARY
`
`From the remarks provided above, together with the concurrently filed and subsequently
`
`approved Electronic Terminal Disclaimer, Applicant respectfully submits thatall of the pending
`
`claims in the present patent application are patentable over the references cited by the Examiner,
`
`either alone or in combination. Accordingly, reconsideration of the outstanding Official Action
`
`is respectfully requested, and an indication of the allowability of pending claims 1-9 is now
`
`believed to be appropriate.
`
`Applicant notes that no acquiescenceas to the propriety of the Examiner’s rejection is
`
`madeby the present response. Should there be any questions, the Examineris invited to contact
`
`the undersigned at the below-listed telephone number.
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`/Gary V. Harkcom/
`Reg. No. 62,956
`Gary V. Harkcom
`
`for Bruce H. Bernstein
`Reg. No. 29,027
`
`January 6, 2022
`GREENBLUM & BERNSTEIN,P.L.C.
`1950 Roland Clarke Place
`Reston, VA 20191
`(703) 716-1191
`
`{P61565 05113813.DOCX}
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket