Appl. No. 17/467,517
`
`Attorney Docket No. P64308
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`Inventor(s): Hiroshi YAHATAetal.
`
`Art Unit
`
`: 3686
`
`Appl. No.
`
`: 17/467,517
`
`Examiner : Cobanoglu, Dilek
`
`Filed
`
`: September 7, 2021
`
`Conf. No.: 8853
`
`For
`
`: METHOD OF PROVIDING INFORMATION
`
`SUBMISSION UNDER37 C.F.R.§1.114 AND STATEMENT OF SUBSTANCE OF
`INTERVIEW
`
`Commissioner for Patents
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`Commissioner:
`
`In response to the Final Office Action of February 2, 2024, in which a three-month
`
`shortened statutory period for responseis set to expire on May 2, 2024, the present paper being
`
`submitted concurrent with a Request for Continued Examination, applicant respectfully requests
`
`reconsideration and withdrawal of the outstanding rejections set forth in the Final Office Action,
`
`in view of the herein-contained remarks.
`
`Amendments to the Claims begin on page 2 ofthis paper.
`
`Remarksbegin on page 16 of this paper.
`
`{P64308 06110903. DOCX}
`1
`
`

`

`Appl. No. 17/467,517
`
`Attorney Docket No. P64308
`
`AMENDMENTS TO THE CLAIMS
`
`Uponentry of the present amendment, the status of the claims will be as is shown below.
`
`This listing of claims replaces all previous versions andlistings of claims in the present
`
`application.
`
`
`
`
`
`1. (Currently Amended) A methodefprevidinemanacementinformationin-ahealth
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`correspondingto-arestaurantthemethedcomprising:
`
`controlling information in a cyber-physical infrastructure comprising a health
`
`management system communicating, via a network, with a first server securely managing
`
`biological information comprising dietary information of a user associated with identification
`
`information identifying the user, an information terminal, and a second server storing menu
`
`information indicating one or more dishes in a restaurant, wherein the controlling comprises:
`
`eutputtiie transmitting, at the first server to the second server via the network, a request
`
`efacquisittier-ef forthe menu information stored at [[to]] the second server based on a request
`
`for a dynamic personalized menuforthe user originating reeetved-from anatthe information
`
`terminal of the user from the user acquiring a restaurant identification (ID) vie-anetwork,
`
`wherein the second server tags each of the one or more dishes with a hypertext markup
`
`language (HTML) tag;
`
`{P64308 06110903. DOCX}
`2
`
`

`

`Appl. No. 17/467,517
`
`Attorney Docket No. P64308
`
`receiving, at the first server from the information terminal via the network, the
`
`identification information stored in the information terminal from+theimfermatenterminalyieea
`
`
`
`network-withinformationbytheasertobased upon user access authorization and apermission
`
`
`
`
`request for latest [[the]] biological information of the user comprising the dietary information;
`
`acquiring the menu information comprising the HTML tag for each of the one or more
`
`dishes from the secondserver;
`
`Hradvanee-of prior to the receivingtheidentificationinformation, the first server securely
`
`managingthe biological information by steragesthat sequentially stere fragmenting the
`
`biological information [[in]] based on timeseries [[in]] association between withthe
`
`eoerrespendine time when the biological information is measured #mine-data and the
`
`identification information of the user, encrypting the fragments, storing the encrypted fragments
`
`
`across[[in a]] distributed and-eneryptedunanner storage devices, and decrypting a fragment with
`
`requested biological information from the stored encrypted fragments,
`
`wherein the biological information is acquired from an information source[[,]] and isthe
`
`
`
`measured at the information source ieladine-one-ef by either a biosensor associated with the
`
`information terminal held-by+he-user or bya medicalinstitution of the user;
`
`wherein the first server securely manages[[ing]] the steragesineludes biological
`
`information by:
`
`fragmenting uper-acquitine the biological information acquired from the biosensor via
`
`the information terminal_into fragments of the biological information, encrypting the fragments,
`
`storing the encrypted fragments across distributed storage devices, and decrypting a fragment
`
`{P64308 06110903. DOCX}
`3
`
`

`

`Appl. No. 17/467,517
`
`Attorney Docket No. P64308
`
`with the requested biological information from the stored encrypted fragments; intethe-sterages
`
`a
`
`the
`
`diste!
`
`Land
`
`whereinthe+nformationterminaltransmits the biological information received from the
`
`biosensoris transmitted from the information terminal to the first server for the fragmenting, the
`
`encrypting, and the storing of the biological information across distributed storage devices;
`
`readine decrypting, frem bythe first server sterages, a fragment comprising the requested
`
`latest biological information as measured at a correspondinglatest time, the latest biological
`
`information of the user associated with the identification information with-cerrespending
`
`
`
`estimating, based on the latest biological information of the user and the corresponding
`
`
`
`measuredtininedatatreadlatest time by the first server, a cumulative intake of a specific
`
`nutrient or calories taken in past one or more meals in a predeterminedperiod;
`
`
`
`generating ifermattonindicating
`
`a degree indicator that indicates[[of]] dietary restriction
`
`associated with a severity dependine-on-a-preeress of a disease of the user-usig based on the
`
`estimated cumulative intake of the specific nutrient or calories taken in the past one or more
`
`meals in the predetermined period;
`
`
`
`generating, by the first server based-onthe-menuinformation-_andtheinformation
`
`
`
`indicatinethe-desree-ofdietary restriction, the dynamic personalized menu for the user derived
`
`
`
`by matching the one or more dishes of the menu information from the second server with the
`
`degree indicator that indicates dietary restriction generated from the latest biological information
`
`
`
`at the first server resulting inse-aste-meettheinformationindicating the dynamic personalized
`
`
`
`
`
`menu correlating with the degree indicator that indicates [[of]] dietary restriction; and
`
`{P64308 06110903. DOCX}
`4
`
`

`

`Appl. No. 17/467,517
`
`Attorney Docket No. P64308
`
`transmitting the dynamic personalized menu to the information terminal [[to]] displaying
`
`the dynamic personalized menu on a display of the information terminal aad+e-aHew enabling a
`
`selection of a dish te-be-selected via the dynamic personalized menu displayed on the display of
`
`the information terminal.
`
`2.
`
`(Previously Presented) The method of providing information according to Claim 1,
`
`wherein when the request for the personalized menu forthe user is acquired, a seat ID indicating
`
`a seat of the user is acquired from the information terminal of the user, wherein the seat ID is
`
`acquired via an operation screen displayed on the display of the information terminal.
`
`3.
`
`(Original) The method of providing information according to Claim 1, wherein the
`
`personalized menu includes a dish produced by modifying a dish included in the menu
`
`information so as to reduce an ingredient specified by the information indicating the degree of
`
`dietary restriction as an ingredient to be avoidedby the user.
`
`4.
`
`(Original) The method of providing information according to Claim 3, wherein the
`
`reducing of the ingredient includes removing the ingredient such that an amountofthe ingredient
`
`is zero.
`
`5.
`
`(Original) The method of providing information according to Claim 1, wherein the
`
`personalized menu is generated from the menu information by excluding or graying out a dish
`
`including an ingredient specified by the information indicating the degree of dietary restriction as
`
`an ingredient to be avoided by the user.
`
`{P64308 06110903. DOCX}
`5
`
`

`

`Appl. No. 17/467,517
`
`Attorney Docket No. P64308
`
`6.
`
`(Original) The method of providing information according to Claim 1, wherein the
`
`personalized menuincludesa dish obtained by adding a nutrient, which tendsto be deficient
`
`depending on the progress of the disease of the user, to a dish included in the one or more dishes.
`
`7.
`
`(Original) The method of providing information according to Claim 1, wherein the
`
`personalized menu includes a description proposing a side dish for supplementing a nutrient
`
`tending to be deficient depending on the progress of the disease of the user.
`
`8.
`
`(Original) The method of providing information according to Claim 1, wherein the
`
`personalized menuincludesa dish obtained by adding, to a dish included in the one or more
`
`dishes, an ingredient including a nutrient lacking in past one or more meals ofthe user in a
`
`particular period.
`
`9.
`
`(Original) The method of providing information according to Claim 1, wherein the
`
`personalized menu includes a description proposing a side dish for supplementing a nutrient
`
`lacking in past one or more meals of the user in a particular period.
`
`10.
`
`(Previously Presented) The method of providing information according to Claim 1,
`
`wherein
`
`the information indicating the degree of dietary restriction includes information
`
`indicating a maximum acceptable intake in a current meal as to the specific nutrient related to the
`
`disease of the user, and the information indicating the maximum acceptable intake in the current
`
`{P64308 06110903. DOCX}
`6
`
`

`

`Appl. No. 17/467,517
`
`Attorney Docket No. P64308
`
`mealis given by a value equal to or smaller than a value obtained by subtracting the cumulative
`
`intake taken in the past one or more meals in the predetermined period from a maximum
`
`acceptable intake in the predetermined period, and
`
`the personalized menu includes a dish obtained such that when a dish included in the one
`
`or more dishes contains a greater amountof the specific nutrient than the maximum acceptable
`
`intake in the current meal, the amountof the specific nutrient is reduced to be equal to or smaller
`
`than the maximum acceptable intake in the current meal.
`
`11.
`
`(Previously Presented) The method of providing information according to Claim 1,
`
`wherein
`
`the information indicating the degree of dietary restriction includes information
`
`indicating a target intake in a current meal as to the specific nutrient related to the disease of the
`
`user, and the information indicating the target intake in the current meal is given by a value equal
`
`to or greater than a value obtained by subtracting the cumulative intake taken in the past one or
`
`more meals in the predetermined period from a target intake in the predetermined period, and
`
`the personalized menu includes a dish obtained such that when a dish included in the one
`
`or more dishes contains a smaller amountof the specific nutrient than the target intake in the
`
`current meal, the amountof the specific nutrient is increased to be equal to or greater than the
`
`target intake in the current meal.
`
`12.
`
`(Previously Presented) The method of providing information according to Claim 1,
`
`wherein
`
`{P64308 06110903. DOCX}
`7
`
`

`

`Appl. No. 17/467,517
`
`Attorney Docket No. P64308
`
`the information indicating the degree of dietary restriction includes information
`
`indicating a maximum acceptable intake of calories in a current meal depending on the disease of
`
`the user, and the information indicating the maximum acceptable intake of calories in the current
`
`mealis given by a value equal to or smaller than a value obtained by subtracting the cumulative
`
`intake of calories taken in the past one or more meals in the predetermined period from an
`
`maximum acceptable intake of calories in the predetermined period, and
`
`the personalized menu includes a dish obtained such that when a dish included in the one
`
`or more dishes contains a greater amountof calories than the maximum acceptable intake of
`
`calories in the current meal, the amount of calories is reduced to be equal to or smaller than the
`
`maximum acceptable intake of calories in the current meal.
`
`13.
`
`(Previously Presented) The method of providing information according to Claim 1,
`
`wherein
`
`the information indicating the degree of dietary restriction includes information
`
`indicating a maximum acceptable intake in a current meal as to the specific nutrient related to the
`
`disease of the user, and the information indicating the maximum acceptable intake in the current
`
`mealis given by a value equal to or smaller than a value obtained by subtracting the cumulative
`
`intake taken in the past one or more meals in the predetermined period from a maximum
`
`acceptable intake in the predetermined period, and
`
`the personalized menu is generated such that when a dish in the one or more dishes
`
`includes a greater amountof the specific nutrient than the maximum acceptable intake in the
`
`current meal, the dish is excluded or grayed out.
`
`{P64308 06110903. DOCX}
`8
`
`

`

`Appl. No. 17/467,517
`
`Attorney Docket No. P64308
`
`14.
`
`(Previously Presented) The method of providing information according to Claim 1,
`
`wherein
`
`the information indicating the degree of dietary restriction includes information
`
`indicating a target intake in a current meal as to the specific nutrient related to the disease of the
`
`user, and the information indicating the target intake in the current mealis given by a value equal
`
`to or greater than a value obtained by subtracting the cumulative intake taken in the past one or
`
`more meals in the predetermined period from a target intake in the predetermined period, and
`
`the personalized menu is generated such that when a dish included in the one or more
`
`dishes contains a smaller amountof the specific nutrient than the target intake in the current
`
`meal, the dish is excluded or grayed out.
`
`15.
`
`(Previously Presented) The method of providing information according to Claim 1,
`
`wherein
`
`the information indicating the degree of dietary restriction includes information
`
`indicating a maximum acceptable intake of calories in a current meal depending on the disease of
`
`the user, and the information indicating the maximum acceptable intake of calories in the current
`
`mealis given by a value equal to or smaller than a value obtained by subtracting the cumulative
`
`intake of calories taken in the past one or more meals in the predetermined period from an
`
`maximum acceptable intake of calories in the predetermined period, and
`
`the personalized menu is generated such that when a dish included in the one or more
`
`dishes contains a greater amountof calories than the maximum acceptable intake of calories in
`
`the current meal, the dish is excluded or grayed out.
`
`{P64308 06110903. DOCX}
`9
`
`

`

`Appl. No. 17/467,517
`
`Attorney Docket No. P64308
`
`16.
`
`(Previously Presented) The method of providing information according to Claim 1,
`
`wherein
`
`the information indicating the degree of dietary restriction includes information
`
`indicating a maximum acceptable intake in a current meal as to the specific nutrient related to the
`
`disease of the user, and the information indicating the maximum acceptable intake in the current
`
`mealis given by a value equal to or smaller than a value obtained by subtracting the cumulative
`
`intake taken in the past one or more meals in the predetermined period from a maximum
`
`acceptable intake in the predetermined period, and
`
`the personalized menu includes a dish obtained such that when a dish included in the one
`
`or more dishes contains a greater amountof the specific nutrient than the maximum acceptable
`
`intake in the current meal, the dish is added with an ingredient containing a neutralizing nutrient
`
`having an effect that intake of the neutralizing nutrient together with the specific nutrient
`
`neutralizes an adverse effect of the greater amount of specific nutrient than the maximum
`
`acceptable intake in the current meal.
`
`17.
`
`(Previously Presented) The method of providing information according to Claim 1,
`
`wherein
`
`the information indicating the degree of dietary restriction includes information
`
`indicating a maximum acceptable intake in a current meal as to the specific nutrient related to the
`
`disease of the user, and the information indicating the maximum acceptable intake in the current
`
`mealis given by a value equal to or smaller than a value obtained by subtracting the cumulative
`
`intake taken in the past one or more meals in the predetermined period from a maximum
`
`acceptable intake in the predetermined period, and
`
`{P64308 06110903. DOCX}
`10
`
`

`

`Appl. No. 17/467,517
`
`Attorney Docket No. P64308
`
`the personalized menu includesa description of a combination of a dish including a
`
`greater amountof the specific nutrient than the maximum acceptable intake in the current meal
`
`and a dish including a neutralizing nutrient having an effect that intake of the neutralizing
`
`nutrient together with the specific nutrient neutralizes an adverse effect of the greater amount of
`
`the specific nutrient than the maximum acceptable intake in the current meal.
`
`18.
`
`(Previously Presented) The method of providing information according to Claim 1,
`
`wherein
`
`the information indicating the degree of dietary restriction includes information
`
`indicating a maximum acceptable intake in a current meal as to the specific nutrient related to the
`
`disease of the user, and the information indicating the maximum acceptable intake in the current
`
`mealis given by a value equal to or smaller than a value obtained by subtracting the cumulative
`
`intake taken in the past one or more meals in the predetermined period from a maximum
`
`acceptable intake in the predetermined period, and
`
`the personalized menu includesa description of a combination of dishes that provides a
`
`total amount of intake equal to or smaller than the maximum acceptable intake in the current
`
`meal.
`
`19.
`
`(Previously Presented) The method of providing information according to Claim 1,
`
`wherein
`
`the information indicating the degree of dietary restriction includes information
`
`indicating a target intake in a current meal as to the specific nutrient related to the disease of the
`
`user, and the information indicating the target intake in the current mealis given by a value equal
`
`{P64308 06110903. DOCX}
`11
`
`

`

`Appl. No. 17/467,517
`
`Attorney Docket No. P64308
`
`to or greater than a value obtained by subtracting the cumulative intake taken in the past one or
`
`more meals in the predetermined period from a target intake in the predetermined period, and
`
`the personalized menu includesa description of a combination of dishes that provides
`
`intake equal to or greater than the target intake in the current meal.
`
`20.
`
`(Previously Presented) The method of providing information according to Claim 1,
`
`wherein
`
`the information indicating the degree of dietary restriction includes information
`
`indicating a maximum acceptable intake of calories in a current meal depending on the disease of
`
`the user, and the information indicating the maximum acceptable intake of calories in the current
`
`mealis given by a value equal to or smaller than a value obtained by subtracting the cumulative
`
`intake of calories taken in the past one or more meals in the predetermined period from an
`
`maximum acceptable intake of calories in the predetermined period, and
`
`the personalized menu includesa description of a combination of dishes that provides a
`
`total amount of calories equal to or smaller than the maximum acceptable intake of calories in
`
`the current meal.
`
`21.
`
`(Original) The method of providing information according to Claim 1, wherein the
`
`personalized menu includesa first dish and a second dish that is displayed at a lowerpriority
`
`than the first dish, wherein the second dish includes a greater amount of nutrient whose intakeis
`
`restricted due to the disease of the user than thefirst dish.
`
`{P64308 06110903.DOCX}
`12
`
`

`

`Appl. No. 17/467,517
`
`Attorney Docket No. P64308
`
`22.
`
`(Original) The method of providing information according to Claim 1, wherein the
`
`personalized menu includesa first dish and a second dish that is displayed at a lowerpriority
`
`than the first dish, wherein the second dish includes a smaller amount of nutrient whoseintakeis
`
`recommended for the disease of the user than thefirst dish.
`
`23.
`
`(Original) The method of providing information according to Claim 21, wherein
`
`displaying of the second dish at the lowerpriority than the first dish is executed in one of
`
`manners including at least a) a manner in which an order of displaying the second dish is lower
`
`than an order of displaying the first dish, b) a manner in whicha size of an area in which the
`
`second dish is displayed is smaller than a size of an area in whichthefirst dish is displayed, or c)
`
`a manner in which the second dish is displayed in a lower gradation level than a gradation level
`
`in whichthefirst dish is displayed.
`
`24.
`
`(Original) The method of providing information according to Claim 1, wherein the
`
`information indicating the degree of dietary restriction is updated as the disease of the user
`
`progresses.
`
`25.
`
`(Previously Presented) The method of providing information according to Claim 1,
`
`wherein
`
`the information indicating the degree of dietary restriction is updated accordingto at least
`
`one of a) an acquisition of a result of a medical examination, b) an acquisition of medical record
`
`information generated when a diagnosis is made, or c) an acquisition of biological information of
`
`the user via the biosensor that detects the biological information ofthe user.
`
`{P64308 06110903. DOCX}
`13
`
`

`

`Appl. No. 17/467,517
`
`Attorney Docket No. P64308
`
`26.
`
`(Previously Presented) The method of providing information according to Claim 1,
`
`further includes
`
`receiving, from the information terminal of the user, a) information indicating a dish
`
`nameofa dish selected via the personalized menu, b) information indicating a price of the dish
`
`selected via the personalized menu, c) information indicating a date and time whenthe dish
`
`selected via the personalized menuis ordered, and d) information indicating a nutrient included
`
`in the dish selected via the personalized menu.
`
`27.
`
`(Original) The method of providing information according to Claim 1, wherein the
`
`identification information includes a user ID.
`
`28.
`
`(Original) The method of providing information according to Claim 1, wherein the first
`
`server is different from the second server.
`
`29.
`
`(Original) The method of providing information according to Claim 2, wherein the seat
`
`ID is acquired by reading, via the operation screen, an identification code preparedat a
`
`corresponding position of a table where the useris seated.
`
`30.
`
`(Original) The method of providing information according to Claim 29, wherein the
`
`identification code includes a QR code.
`
`{P64308 06110903. DOCX}
`14
`
`

`

`Appl. No. 17/467,517
`
`Attorney Docket No. P64308
`
`31.
`
`(Original) The method of providing information according to Claim 29, wherein the
`
`identification code is read using NFC (Near Field Communication).
`
`32.
`
`(Original) The method of providing information according to Claim 1, wherein
`
`the first server manages, in a distributed manner, biological information, preference
`
`information of the user including goods purchase history information or dish order history
`
`information, and action history information including position information of the user.
`
`33.
`
`(Previously presented) The method of providing information according to Claim 1,
`
`wherein the biological information is stored into the storages in the distributed and
`
`encrypted manner by dividing the biological information into a plurality of files, and storing the
`
`plurality of files in the storagesin thefirst server, and
`
`the reading the latest biological information includes:
`
`reading the plurality of files correspondingto the latest biological information
`
`from the storages in the first server; and
`
`restoring the latest biological information from the read plurality offiles.
`
`34.
`
`(Previously presented) The method of providing information according to Claim 33,
`
`wherein the information terminal transmits the biological information received from the
`
`biosensorto the first server after receiving, from the biosensor, setting information to allow
`
`sharing of the biological information with the first server, and
`
`the securely managing the storages further includes:
`
`{P64308 06110903. DOCX}
`15
`
`

`

`Appl. No. 17/467,517
`
`Attorney Docket No. P64308
`
`each time the biological information is acquired from the medicalinstitution, storing the
`
`biological information into the storages in the distributed and encrypted manner, and notifying
`
`the information terminal that the biological information has been added.
`
`{P64308 06110903. DOCX}
`16
`
`

`

`Appl. No. 17/467,517
`
`Attorney Docket No. P64308
`
`Statement of Substance of Interview
`
`REMARKS
`
`Applicant notes with appreciation the courtesies extended to applicant’s representative
`
`Selene Haedi in the interview on 3/6/2024. Applicant’s representative expresses appreciation to
`
`the examinerfor the discussion and insights regarding the §101 issue.
`
`Claim status
`
`Claims 1-34 are pending in the present application.
`
`Claims 1 has been amended. Support for the amendments can be foundin specification
`
`paragraphs[0071]-[0080], [0085]-[0095], [0104]-[0117], [0119]-[0129], [0148]-[0152], [0198],
`
`and [0250]-[0398].
`
`The herein-contained amendments are not an acquiescence in the propriety of the
`
`outstanding rejections. Instead, the claims are amended to moreclearly and specifically set forth
`
`features of the present application in a sincere effort to advance prosecution. In this regard,it is
`
`submitted that the amendments contain no prohibited new matter.
`
`Applicant addresses the pending rejections below and respectfully requests
`
`reconsideration and withdrawal of the rejections in the next Official communication. Such action
`
`is respectfully requested and submitted to be appropriate for at least the reasons provided below.
`
`Response to examiner’s arguments
`
`The arguments presented by the examiner regarding the §101 arguments have been
`
`reviewed. Applicant respectfully traverses these arguments in light of the amended claim
`
`features and claims and remarksgiven below regarding the §101 rejections.
`
`{P64308 06110903. DOCX}
`17
`
`

`

`Appl. No. 17/467,517
`
`Attorney Docket No. P64308
`
`The examineralso cites Nasserbakht et al. regarding step 2B as allegedly teaching the
`
`claim features because Nasserbakhtet al. teaches “time-based and event-based storage”,
`
`sequential aspect, and distributed memory. The examinerstates that Nasserbakhtet al. allegedly
`
`supports the examiner’s argument of well-understood, routine, and conventionalactivities
`
`(WURC). Applicant respectfully disagrees.
`
`Applicantfirstly notes that Nasserbakhtet al. does not teach the secure management of
`
`biological information comprising dietary information as recited in the claim features. Although
`
`Nasserbakhtet al. mentions biological, this is with regards to biological checks and identification
`
`related to accessing the user device, e.g.
`
`to monitor cases “where the authorized user is under
`
`duress and is forced to provide the biological identification against his consent” (Nasserbakhtet
`
`al. col. 32, lines 52-67). As such, this is a distinction from the present claim features, wherein the
`
`user biological information comprising dietary information are the private data that is being
`
`securely managed via the sequential fragmentation, encryption, and storage of the encrypted
`
`fragments across distributed storage devices, with decryption of just a fragment with the
`
`requested biological information from the stored encrypted fragments. That is, contrary to the
`
`examiner’s arguments, Nasserbakht et al. teaches a wholly different process with an entirely
`
`different application than the present claimsfeatures.
`
`Regarding the sequential data storage issue, the citation given by the examiner of
`
`Nasserbakhtet al. at col. 18, lines 42-52 merely states that “[a]s new pieces of information are
`
`received or generated, they are written sequentially in memory”, it does not describe the type of
`
`new information being received or generated and doesnot describe any fragmenting, encrypting
`
`of the fragments, storing of the encrypted fragments across distributed storage devices, and
`
`decrypting ofjust a fragment with the requested biological information from the stored encrypted
`
`{P64308 06110903. DOCX}
`18
`
`

`

`Appl. No. 17/467,517
`
`Attorney Docket No. P64308
`
`fragments as recited in the claim features. Additionally, the sequential in memory stated in
`
`Nasserbakhtet al. at that citation differs from the sequential process being recited in the claim
`
`features, notably that the biological information is sequentially fragmented based on timeseries
`
`association between time whenthe biological information is measured and the identification
`
`information of the user. Nasserbakhtet al. does not teach this claim feature and instead, describes
`
`that the sequential aspect is based on time as determined by the user (Nasserbakhtetal. col. 18,
`
`lines 42-44). Furthermore, the citation does not describe the storing of the encrypted fragments
`
`across distributed storage devices as recited in applicant’s claim features. Rather, the citation at
`
`Nasserbakhtet al. simply states that the new info is written sequentially in memory,i.e., one
`
`memory rather than being distributed across storage devices as recited in applicant’s claim
`
`features. Thus, the sequential aspect with the related memory storage in Nasserbakht etal. is
`
`markedly different than the sequential process and storing of the encrypted fragments across
`
`distributed storage devices, among other claim features as recited in applicant’s claim features.
`
`Therefore, Nasserbakhtet al. does not teach applicant’s claim features and does not support the
`
`examiner’s arguments.
`
`Additionally, applicant notes that the distributed memory cited by the examinerat
`
`Nasserbakhtet al. col. 5, lines 30-34 states that: “The mobile device has user-customizable
`
`functionality according to a user’s needs and/or desires. The mobile device may be in the form
`
`of a multi-function mobile electronic system with distributed memory and processing elements.”
`
`Thatis, the citation is describing a distributed memory associated with only the user mobile
`
`device. In contrast, applicant’s claim features are describing distributed storage devices
`
`associated with a first server that securely managesthe biological information, which is wholly
`
`different and separate from the informational terminal of the user (e.g., user mobile device).
`
`{P64308 06110903. DOCX}
`19
`
`

`

`Appl. No. 17/467,517
`
`Attorney Docket No. P64308
`
`Thus, the distribute memory in Nasserbakhtet al. does not teach the distributed storage devices
`
`associated with a first server as recited in applicant’s claim features.
`
`Applicant reiterates the above arguments for the various other citations and regarding the
`
`“time-based and event-based storage”citation as cited by the examiner at Nasserbakhtet al. col.
`
`5, line 66 to col. 6, line 20. The citation merely describes a “time-based information system
`
`(TIBIS)” for use “in a mobile device”. Thatis, the system is essentially only within the mobile
`
`device. In contrast, applicant’s claim features recite a cyber-physical infrastructure with a health
`
`management system comprising a first server, an informational terminal, and a secondserver,
`
`wherein the various operations occur within different elements suchasthe first server, the
`
`informational terminal, and the second server. In contrast, Nasserbakhtet al. is describing just a
`
`singular aspect, namely a mobile device of the user. This is markedly different from applicant’s
`
`claim features. Therefore, Nasserbakhtet al. does not teach applicant’s claim features and does
`
`not support the examiner’s arguments.
`
`Accordingly, for the reasons stated above, Nasserbakhtet al. does not teach applicant’s
`
`claim features and does not support the examiner’s arguments of WURC. Applicant’s claim
`
`features describe particular and specific steps, as explained above, that are not WURC. Instead,
`
`applicant’s claim features are indicative of being significantly more than the judicial exception.
`
`Rejections under 35 U.S.C. §101
`
`The examiner rejected claims 1-34 under §101 for allegedly being directed to a judicial
`
`exception without significantly more.
`
`Applicant respectfully traverses these groundsofrejection at least in view of the claim
`
`amendments and remarks.
`
`{P64308 06110903.DOCX}
`20
`
`

`

`Appl. No. 17/467,517
`
`Attorney Docket No. P64308
`
`Independent claim 1 has been amendedto include further clarifying details regarding a
`
`cyber-physical infrastructure with the health management system comprising an informational
`
`terminal, a first server, and a server; technical operational steps enabling secure managementof
`
`private user data