throbber
www.uspto.gov
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and TrademarkOffice
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`17/486,659
`
`09/27/2021
`
`Kiyofumi ABE
`
`735256.437C2
`
`6315
`
`Seed IP Law Group LLP/Panasonic (PIPCA)
`701 5th Avenue, Suite 5400
`Seattle, WA 98104
`
`SUH, JOSEPH JINWOO
`
`ART UNIT
`
`2485
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`10/13/2023
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`Thetime period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e-mail address(es):
`USPTOeAction @ SeedIP.com
`
`pairlinkdktg @seedip.com
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`Office Action Summary
`
`Application No.
`17/486,659
`Examiner
`JOSEPH SUH
`
`Applicant(s)
`ABE etal.
`Art Unit
`2485
`
`AIA (FITF) Status
`Yes
`
`-- The MAILING DATEof this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLYIS SET TO EXPIRE 3 MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available underthe provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply betimely filed after SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing
`date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, evenif timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term
`adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`
`
`1) Responsive to communication(s) filed on 9/27/21.
`C} A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/werefiled on
`
`2a)() This action is FINAL. 2b)¥)This action is non-final.
`3)02 An election was madeby the applicant in responseto a restriction requirement set forth during the interview
`on
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`4)\0) Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Exparte Quayle, 1935 C.D. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`1-6 is/are pending in the application.
`)
`Claim(s)
`5a) Of the above claim(s) ___ is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`Cj} Claim(s)
`is/are allowed.
`Claim(s) 1-6 is/are rejected.
`S)
`) © Claim(s)___is/are objected to.
`Cj) Claim(s
`are subjectto restriction and/or election requirement
`)
`S)
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you maybeeligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`http://Awww.uspto.gov/patents/init_events/pph/index.jsp or send an inquiry to PPHfeedback@uspto.gov.
`
`) )
`
`Application Papers
`10)(] The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`11) The drawing(s)filed on 9/27/21 is/are: a)¥) accepted or b)() objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`12)1) Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d)or (f).
`Certified copies:
`_—_c)L) None ofthe:
`b)L) Some**
`a)Q) All
`1.2) Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`2.2 Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`3.4.) Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been receivedin this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`* See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1)
`
`Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`2)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3)
`
`(LJ Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`4) (J Other:
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mail Date 20231004
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/486,659
`Art Unit: 2485
`
`Page 2
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`Notice of Pre-AlA or AIA Status
`
`The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013,
`
`is being examined under the
`
`first inventor to file provisions of the AIA.
`
`Claim Status
`
`This Office Action responds to application 17/486659 filed on 9/27/21. Claims 1-6 are
`
`pending.
`
`Priority
`
`Acknowledgmentis made of applicant's claim fora provisional application filed on
`
`3/30/18.
`
`Information Disclosure Statement
`
`The Information Disclosure Statement received on 9/27/21 has been considered.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
`
`In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C.
`
`102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction
`
`of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if
`
`the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same
`
`under either status.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/486,659
`Art Unit: 2485
`
`Page 3
`
`The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the
`
`basis for the rejections under this section madein this Office action:
`
`A person shall be entitled to a patent unless-
`(a)(1) the claimed inventionwaspatented, described in a printed publication, orin public use, on sale or
`otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
`
`1.
`
`Claims 5 and 6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. as being anticipated by
`
`Bivolarsky et al., US 2014/0105277 A1 (hereinafter Bivolarsky).
`
`As for claims 5 and 6, Bivolarsky discloses non-transitory computer-readable
`
`medium ([0143], e.g., RAM, ROM, optical disk) storing a bitstream (the medium is
`
`utilized merely as a support for the bitstream, thus, the bitstream has no patentable
`
`weight. See MPEP 2111.05.).
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`
`In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35
`
`U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any
`
`correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new groundof
`
`rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be
`
`the same under either status.
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness
`
`rejections set forth in this Office action:
`
`A patent fora claimed invention maynotbe obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not
`identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 ofthis title, if the differences between the claimed
`invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/486,659
`Art Unit: 2485
`
`Page 4
`
`beforethe effectivefiling date of the claimed inventionto a person having ordinary skill in the art to
`which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall notbe negated by the manner in which the
`invention was made.
`
`1.
`
`Claims 1 - 6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable
`
`over Bivolarsky in view of Shenet al., US 2001/0021222 A1 (hereinafter Shen).
`
`Asfor claim 1, Bivolarsky discloses an encoder ([0032], e.g., encoding)
`
`comprising: circuitry ([0072], e.g., CPU); and memory ([0072], e.g., memory) coupled
`
`to the circuitry, wherein using the memory, the circuitry, in operation: generates a
`
`plurality of quantization matrix elements ([0047], e.g., matrix of quantization, note the
`
`elements of the matrix) for a current block ([0047], e.g., block); generates a
`
`quantization matrix ([0047], e.g., matrix of quantization) using the plurality of
`
`quantization matrix elements ([0047], e.g., matrix of quantization, note the elements
`
`of the matrix), and quantizes ([0047], e.g., quantization), using the quantization
`
`matrix, transform coefficients ([0047], e.g., coefficient) of the current block.
`
`Bivolarsky does not explicitly disclose, but, Shen teaches the quantization matrix
`
`including only a subset ([0061], e.g., truncated) of quantization matrix elements of the
`
`plurality of quantization matrix elements ([0061], e.g., quantization matrix), each of the
`
`subset of quantization matrix elements having an x-coordinate value less than a
`
`threshold x-coordinate value, a y-coordinate value less than a threshold y-coordinate
`
`value, or an x-coordinate value less than the threshold x-coordinate value and a y-
`
`coordinate value less than the threshold y-coordinate value (Fig. 2A, e.g., truncated).
`
`Therefore, given the teachings as a whole,
`
`it would have been obvious to one of
`
`ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, having
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/486,659
`Art Unit: 2485
`
`Page 5
`
`the references of Bivolarsky and Shen before him/her to modify the color adaptation in
`
`video coding of Bivolarsky with the teaching of quantization matrix forstill and moving
`
`picture coding of Shen with a motivation to reduce overhead forlow bit rate
`
`transmission as taught by Shen ([0008)).
`
`As for claim 2, mostoflimitations of this claim have been noted in the rejection
`
`of Claim 1.
`
`Bivolarsky does not explicitly teach, but, Shen teaches the threshold x-coordinate
`
`value is 31, and the threshold y-coordinate value is 31 (Fig. 2A, note the threshold of
`
`8).
`
`Therefore, given the teachings as a whole,
`
`it would have been obvious to one of
`
`ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, having
`
`the references of Bivolarsky and Shen before him/her to modify the color adaptation in
`
`video coding of Bivolarsky with the teaching of quantization matrix for still and moving
`
`picture coding of Shen with a motivation to reduce overhead forlow bit rate
`
`transmission as taught by Shen ([0008)).
`
`As for claim 3, the claim recites a decoder of the encoder of claim 1, and is
`
`similarly analyzed.
`
`As forclaim 4, the claim recites a decoder of the encoder of claim 2, and is
`
`similarly analyzed.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/486,659
`Art Unit: 2485
`
`Page 6
`
`Asfor claim 5, the claim recites a non-transitory computer readable medium
`
`storing a bitstream of the encoder of claim 1, and is similarly analyzed.
`
`Asfor claim 6, the claim recites a non-transitory computer readable medium
`
`storing a bitstream of the encoder of claim 2, and is similarly analyzed.
`
`Citation of Pertinent Prior Art
`
`The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's
`
`disclosure:
`
`1. US 2003/0108099 discloses picture encoding method and apparatus, picture
`
`decoding method and apparatus and furnishing medium.
`
`Conclusion
`
`Anyinquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the
`
`examiner should be directed to JOSEPH SUH whose telephone numberis 571-270-
`
`7484. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday - Thursday, 7:30 AM - 6:00
`
`PM.
`
`Examiner interviews are available via telephone,
`
`in-person, and video conferencing
`
`using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule aninterview,
`
`applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at
`
`http:/Awww.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's
`
`supervisor, Jay Patel can be reached on 571-272-2988. The fax phone numberfor the
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/486,659
`Art Unit: 2485
`
`Page 7
`
`organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be
`
`obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Centeris
`
`available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center,
`
`visit: httos://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https:/Avww.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-
`
`center for more information about Patent Center and
`
`https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information aboutfiling in DOCX format. For
`
`additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197
`
`(toll-free).
`
`If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service
`
`Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA)or 571-272-1000.
`
`/JOSEPH SUH/
`
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2485
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket