throbber
www.uspto.gov
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and TrademarkOffice
`Address; COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`17/049,433
`
`10/21/2020
`
`Takashi IWAI
`
`733456.606USPC
`
`3430
`
`Seed IP Law Group LLP/Panasonic (PIPCA)
`701 5th Avenue, Suite 5400
`Seattle, WA 98104
`
`DEAN, RAYMONDS
`
`ART UNIT
`
`2645
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`03/18/2022
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e-mail address(es):
`USPTOeAction @ SeedIP.com
`
`pairlinkdktg @seedip.com
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`1,16 and 18-24 is/are pending in the application.
`)
`Claim(s)
`5a) Of the above claim(s)
`is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`C} Claim(s)
`is/are allowed.
`Claim(s) 1,16 and 18-24is/are rejected.
`S)
`) © Claim(s)____is/are objected to.
`Cj) Claim(s
`are subjectto restriction and/or election requirement
`)
`S)
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you maybeeligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`http://www.uspto.gov/patents/init_events/pph/index.jsp or send an inquiry to PPHfeedback@uspto.gov.
`
`) )
`
`Application Papers
`10)C The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`11) The drawing(s)filed on October 21, 2020 is/are: a)(¥) accepted or b)) objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`12)Z) Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f).
`Certified copies:
`_—_c)L) None ofthe:
`b)L) Some**
`a)X) All
`1.2 Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`2.2) Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`3.2.) Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been receivedin this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`* See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1)
`
`Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`2) (J Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3) (J Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`(Qj Other:
`
`4)
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mail Date 20220314
`
`Application No.
`Applicant(s)
`17/049,433
`IWAl et al.
`
`Office Action Summary Art Unit|AIA (FITF) StatusExaminer
`RAYMOND S DEAN
`2645
`Yes
`
`
`
`-- The MAILING DATEofthis communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLYIS SET TO EXPIRE 3 MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available underthe provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply betimely filed after SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing
`date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133}.
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, evenif timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term
`adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`1) Responsive to communication(s) filed on February 17, 2022.
`C) A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/werefiled on
`
`2a)L) This action is FINAL. 2b)¥)This action is non-final.
`3)02 An election was madeby the applicant in responseto a restriction requirement set forth during the interview
`on
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`4\0) Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Exparte Quayle, 1935 C.D. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/049,433
`Art Unit: 2645
`
`Page 2
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`Notice of Pre-AlA or AIA Status
`
`The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined
`
`under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA.
`
`Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114
`
`1.
`
`A requestfor continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set
`
`forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), wasfiled in this application after final rejection. Since this
`
`application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set
`
`forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action
`
`has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on
`
`February 17, 2022 has been entered.
`
`PLEASE NOTE: Examiner reviewed the Applicants’ specification in order to find
`
`features that would place the claims in condition for allowance but was
`
`unsuccessful.
`
`Responseto Arguments
`
`2.
`
`Applicant's arguments, see Applicants’ remarks, filed, with respect to the
`
`rejection(s) of claim(s) 1 under 35 U.S.C. 103 have been fully considered and are
`
`persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further
`
`consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of newly cited prior art Yang
`
`et al. (US 2019/0363832). Yang teaches a detection period of a control channel in the
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/049,433
`Art Unit: 2645
`
`Page 3
`
`terminal being less than or equal to a predetermined value and a detection period being
`
`greater than the predetermined value (Sections 0414, 0417, both sections 0414 and
`
`0417 teach that the detection period for a DCI (downlink control information), which is
`
`transmitted on a downlink control channel can be set thus rendering a myriad of
`
`scenarios wherein the detection period is less than, equal to, or greater than a particular
`
`value or number). Additionally, Examiner has taken another look at the previously cited
`
`reference He etal. (US 2018/0249458). He Section 0029 of He teachesthe allocation
`
`of resources for an uplink control channel (PUCCH). Resource elementsin wireless/RF
`
`systems are not in abundance and therefore limited thus there will be a threshold
`
`associated with said limitation. This produces a myriad of scenarios wherein the
`
`number of resource elements is equal to, greater than, or less than threshold.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112
`
`3.
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b):
`(b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly
`pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor
`regards as the invention.
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AlA), second paragraph:
`The specification shall conclude with one or moreclaims particularly pointing out and distinctly
`claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention.
`
`4.
`
`Claims 16, 19 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AlA),
`
`second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly
`
`claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject
`
`to pre-AlA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention.
`
`Claims 16, 19 recites the limitation "the uplink signal" in lines 12 and 9
`
`respectively. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. All
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/049,433
`Art Unit: 2645
`
`Page 4
`
`claims that depend from Claims 16 and 19 are rejected for the same reasons setforth
`
`above.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`
`5.
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all
`
`obviousnessrejections setforth in this Office action:
`
`A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed
`invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the
`claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have
`been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having
`ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be
`negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
`
`6.
`
`Claims 1, 18, 19, 21, 23 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being
`
`unpatentable over Jung et al. (US 2019/0261281) in view of Yang et al. (US
`
`2019/0363832)
`
`Regarding Claim 1, Jung teaches a terminal comprising: circuitry, which, in
`
`operation, calculates a transmission power using a first power control parameter
`
`corresponding to a first service in response to a predetermined condition relating to a
`
`control channel to be used for transmission of assignment information of an uplink
`
`signal being satisfied, and calculates the transmission power using a second power
`
`control parameter corresponding to a second service in response to the predetermined
`
`condition not being satisfied (Figure 9, Sections 0030, 0079, 0083, an uplink (UL) grant
`
`is scheduled, which is assignmentinformation as shownin Section 0030, the uplink
`
`grant is sent via a control channel in the downlink, the equations of Sections 0030, 0079
`
`teach a plurality of different power control parameters such asc (j) and f sub f,c (i, I)
`
`which can be adjusted based on the type of service such asultra reliable low-latency
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/049,433
`Art Unit: 2645
`
`Page 5
`
`(URLLC) service or enhanced mobile broadband (eMBB), the conditions of a URLLC
`
`service or a eMBB service); and transmission circuitry, which, in operation, transmits an
`
`uplink signal using the calculated transmission power (Figure 9, Sections 0030, 0079,
`
`the uplink signal power is calculated using the power control parameters in the
`
`equations such as c (j) andf sub f,c (i, |).
`
`Jung does not teach calculates a transmission power usingafirst power control
`
`parameter corresponding to a first service in response to a detection period of a control
`
`channel in the terminal being less than or equal to a predetermined value, and
`
`calculates the transmission power using a second power control parameter
`
`corresponding to a second service in response to the detection period being greater
`
`than the predetermined value
`
`Yang, which also teaches a wireless communication system that provides
`
`URLLC and eMBB services, teaches a detection period of a control channel in the
`
`terminal being less than or equal to a predetermined value and a detection period being
`
`greater than the predetermined value (Sections 0414, 0417, both sections 0414 and
`
`0417 teach that the detection period for a DCI (downlink control information), which is
`
`transmitted on a downlink control channel can be set thus rendering a myriad of
`
`scenarios wherein the detection period is less than, equal to, or greater than a particular
`
`value or number).
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective
`
`filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Jung with the above features
`
`of Yang for the purpose ofefficiently performing operations of transmission and
`
`reception of a wireless signal as taught by Yang. The combination of Jung and Yang
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/049,433
`Art Unit: 2645
`
`Page 6
`
`teaches calculates a transmission power using a first power control parameter
`
`corresponding to a first service in response to a detection period of a control channel in
`
`the terminal being less than or equal to a predetermined value, and calculates the
`
`transmission power using a second power control parameter corresponding to a second
`
`service in responseto the detection period being greater than the predetermined value.
`
`Regarding Claim 19, Jung teaches a transmission method comprising:
`
`calculating a transmission power usingafirst power control parameter corresponding to
`
`a first service in response to a predetermined condition relating to a control channel to
`
`be used for transmission of assignment information of an uplink signal being satisfied,
`
`and calculating the transmission power using a second power control parameter
`
`corresponding to a second service in response to the predetermined condition not being
`
`satisfied (Sections 0030, 0079, 0083, an uplink (UL) grant is scheduled, which is
`
`assignmentinformation as shown in Section 0030, the uplink grant is sent via a control
`
`channel in the downlink, the equations of Sections 0030, 0079 teacha plurality of
`
`different power control parameters such as c (j) and f sub f,c (i, 1) which can be
`
`adjusted based on the type of service such asultra reliable low-latency (URLLC) service
`
`or enhanced mobile broadband (eMBB) as shownin Section 0083, the conditions of a
`
`URLLC service or a eMBB service); and transmitting an uplink signal using the
`
`calculated transmission power (Sections 0030, 0079, the uplink signal power is
`
`calculated using the power control parameters in the equations suchas c (j) and f sub
`
`f,c (i, 1)).
`
`Jung does not teach calculating a transmission power using a first power control
`
`parameter corresponding to a first service in response to a detection period of a control
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/049,433
`Art Unit: 2645
`
`Page 7
`
`channel in the terminal being less than or equal to a predetermined value, and
`
`calculating the transmission power using a second power control parameter
`
`corresponding to a second service in response to the detection period being greater
`
`than the predetermined value.
`
`Yang, which also teaches a wireless communication system that provides
`
`URLLC and eMBB services, teaches a detection period of a control channel in the
`
`terminal being less than or equal to a predetermined value and a detection period being
`
`greater than the predetermined value (Sections 0414, 0417, both sections 0414 and
`
`0417 teach that the detection period for a DCI (downlink control information), which is
`
`transmitted on a downlink control channel can be set thus rendering a myriad of
`
`scenarios wherein the detection period is less than, equal to, or greater than a particular
`
`value or number).
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective
`
`filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Jung with the above features
`
`of Yang for the purpose ofefficiently performing operations of transmission and
`
`reception of a wireless signal as taught by Yang. The combination of Jung and Yang
`
`teaches calculates a transmission power usingafirst power control parameter
`
`corresponding to a first service in response to a detection period of a control channel in
`
`the terminal being less than or equal to a predetermined value, and calculates the
`
`transmission power using a second power control parameter corresponding to a second
`
`service in responseto the detection period being greater than the predetermined value.
`
`Regarding Claim 18, The above Jung combination teachesall of the claimed
`
`limitations recited in Claim 1.
`
`Jung further teaches wherein the transmission power
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/049,433
`Art Unit: 2645
`
`Page 8
`
`calculated using the first power control parameter is greater than the transmission
`
`power calculated using the second power control parameter (Sections 0030, 0079, the
`
`uplink signal power is calculated using the power control parameters in the equations
`
`such as c (j) andfsub f,c (i, I), these power control parameters can change thus
`
`rendering a scenario wherein the transmission power defined by said power control
`
`parameters changes thus further rendering a scenario wherein power in one instance is
`
`greater than the transmission power in another instance).
`
`Regarding Claim 21, The above Jung combination teachesall of the claimed
`
`limitations recited in Claim 18. Jung further teaches wherein thefirst service is Ultra-
`
`Reliable and Low Latency Communications (URLLC), and the second service is
`
`different from URLLC (Section 0083, URLLC and eMBB whichis different from URLLC).
`
`Regarding Claim 23, The above Jung combination teachesall of the claimed
`
`limitations recited in Claim 1. Yang further teaches reception circuitry, which, in
`
`operation, receives control information indicating the detection period (Sections 0414,
`
`0417, both sections 0414 and 0417 teach that the detection period for a DCI (downlink
`
`control information), the mobile or UE detects the DCI on the downlink thus said UE will
`
`need reception circuitry, in order to detect said DCI the UE will need know the detection
`
`period thus there will be some kind of indication of the detection period to the UE).
`
`7.
`
`Claims 16, 20, 22 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable
`
`over Jung et al. (US 2019/0261281) in view of He et al. (US 2018/0249458) andin
`
`further view of Kwon et al. (US 2011/0274099)
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/049,433
`Art Unit: 2645
`
`Page 9
`
`Regarding Claim 16, Jung teaches a terminal comprising: circuitry, which, in
`
`operation, calculates a transmission power usingafirst power control parameter
`
`corresponding to a first service in response to a predetermined condition relating to a
`
`control channel to be used for transmission of assignment information of an uplink
`
`signal being satisfied, and calculates the transmission power using a second power
`
`control parameter corresponding to a second service in response to the predetermined
`
`condition not being satisfied (Figure 9, Sections 0030, 0079, 0083, an uplink (UL) grant
`
`is scheduled, which is assignmentinformation as shownin Section 0030, the uplink
`
`grant is sent via a control channel in the downlink, the equations of Sections 0030, 0079
`
`teach a plurality of different power control parameters such as c (j) and f sub f,c (i, I)
`
`which can be adjusted based on the type of service such as ultra reliable low-latency
`
`(URLLC) service or enhanced mobile broadband (eMBB), the conditions of a URLLC
`
`service or a eMBB service); and transmission circuitry, which, in operation, transmits an
`
`uplink signal using the calculated transmission power (Figure 9, Sections 0030, 0079,
`
`the uplink signal power is calculated using the power control parametersin the
`
`equations such as c (j) andfsub f,c (i, 1).
`
`Jung does not teach calculates a transmission power using a first power control
`
`parameter corresponding to a first service in response to a number of resources of
`
`uplink control information being equal to or greater than a predetermined threshold
`
`value, wherein the uplink control information is included in an uplink signal and is a
`
`responsesignal to downlink data of the first service, calculates the transmission power
`
`using a second power control parameter corresponding to a second service in response
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/049,433
`Art Unit: 2645
`
`Page 10
`
`to the number of resources of the uplink control information being less than the
`
`predetermined threshold value
`
`He, which also teaches a wireless communication system, teaches a number of
`
`resources of uplink control information being equal to or greater than a predetermined
`
`threshold value (Section 0029, He teachesthe allocation of resources for an uplink
`
`control channel (PUCCH), Resource elementsin wireless/RF systems are notin
`
`abundanceand therefore limited thus there will be a threshold associated with said
`
`limitation. This produces a myriad of scenarios wherein the number of resource
`
`elements is equal to, greater than, or less than threshold) and a number of resources of
`
`the uplink control information being less than the predetermined threshold value
`
`(Section 0029, He teachesthe allocation of resources for an uplink control channel
`
`(PUCCH), Resource elements in wireless/RF systems are not in abundance and
`
`therefore limited thus there will be a threshold associated with said limitation. This
`
`produces a myriad of scenarios wherein the number of resource elements is equalto,
`
`greater than, or less than threshold).
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective
`
`filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Jung with the above features
`
`of He for the purpose of efficiently transmitting signals on the uplink as taught by He.
`
`Kwon, which also teaches a wireless communication system, teaches wherein
`
`the uplink control information included in the uplink signal and is a response signal to
`
`downlink data of a service (Sections 0049, 0050).
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective
`
`filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of the Jung combination with
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/049,433
`Art Unit: 2645
`
`Page 11
`
`the above features of Kwon for the purpose of decreasing a transmission error rate and
`
`increase capacity as taught by Kwon. The combination of Jung, He, and Kwon teaches
`
`calculates a transmission power usingafirst power control parameter corresponding to
`
`a first service in response to a number of resources of uplink control information being
`
`equal to or greater than a predetermined threshold value, wherein the uplink control
`
`information is included in an uplink signal and is a response signal to downlink data of
`
`the first service, calculates the transmission power using a second power control
`
`parameter corresponding to a second service in response to the number of resources of
`
`the uplink control information being less than the predetermined threshold value.
`
`Regarding Claim 20, Jung in view of He andin further view of Kwon teachesall
`
`of the claimedlimitations recited in Claim 16. Jung further teaches wherein the
`
`transmission power calculated using the first power control parameter is greater than
`
`the transmission power calculated using the second power control parameter (Sections
`
`0030, 0079, the uplink signal power is calculated using the power control parametersin
`
`the equations such as c (j) and f sub f,c (i, l), these power control parameters can
`
`change thus rendering a scenario wherein the transmission power defined by said
`
`power control parameters changes thus further rendering a scenario wherein power in
`
`one instance is greater than the transmission power in another instance).
`
`Regarding Claim 22, Jung in view of He andin further view of Kwon teachesall
`
`of the claimedlimitations recited in Claim 21. Jung further teaches wherein the second
`
`service is enhanced mobile broadband (eMBB)(Section 0083).
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/049,433
`Art Unit: 2645
`
`Page 12
`
`8.
`
`Claim 24 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jung et
`
`al. (US 2019/0261281) in view of Yang etal. (US 2019/0363832), as applied to Claim 1
`
`set forth above, and further in view of Park et al. (US 2016/0227491)
`
`Regarding Claim 24, Jung in view of Yang teachesall of the claimed limitations
`
`recited in Claim 1. Jung in view of Yang does not teach wherein the first power control
`
`parameter includes a first set number that indicates a first power control parameter set,
`
`and the second power control parameter includes a second set number that indicates a
`
`second power control parameter set.
`
`Park, which also teaches the use of power control in a wireless system, teaches
`
`wherein the first power control parameter includes a first set number that indicates a
`
`first power control parameter set, and the second power control parameter includes a
`
`second set number that indicates a second power control parameter set (Section 0142,
`
`the value of the bits are the numbers).
`
`It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective
`
`filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of the Jung combination with
`
`the above features of Park for the purpose of effectively controlling the power of a
`
`sounding reference signal (SRS) as taught by Park.
`
`Conclusion
`
`9.
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the
`
`examiner should be directed to RAYMOND S DEAN whosetelephone number is
`
`(571)272-7877. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 6:00-2:30, EST.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/049,433
`Art Unit: 2645
`
`Page 13
`
`Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video
`
`conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an
`
`interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request
`
`(AIR) at http:/Avww.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's
`
`supervisor, Anthony S Addy can be reached on 571-272-7795. The fax phone number
`
`for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be
`
`obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is
`
`available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center,
`
`visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https:/Awww.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-
`
`center for more information about Patent Center and
`
`https:/Awww.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information aboutfiling in DOCX format. For
`
`additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197
`
`(toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service
`
`Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA)or 571-272-1000.
`
`/RAYMOND S$ DEAN/
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2645
`Raymond S. Dean
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket