throbber
www.uspto.gov
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`17/585,919
`
`01/27/2022
`
`Yuji Oura
`
`P191345US01
`
`9464
`
`WHDA, LLP
`8500 LEESBURG PIKE
`SUITE 7500
`TYSONS, VA22182
`
`KOROVINA, ANNA
`
`1729
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`12/13/2023
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e-mail address(es):
`
`patentmail @ whda.com
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`____ is/are pending in the application.
`) © Claim(s)
`5a) Of the above claim(s) __ is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`C) Claim(s) _ is/are allowed.
`Claim(s) 1-8 is/are rejected.
`(J Claim(s) _ is/are objected to.
`C) Claim(s
`are subjectto restriction and/or election requirement
`)
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you maybeeligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`http:/Awww.uspto.gov/patents/init_events/pph/index.jsp or send an inquiry to PPHfeedback@uspto.gov.
`
`) ) ) )
`
`Application Papers
`10)( The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`11) The drawing(s) filed on
`is/are: a)C] accepted or b)() objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121(d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`12)2) Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d)or (f).
`Certified copies:
`—_c)L) None ofthe:
`b)L) Some**
`a)L) All
`1. Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`2.1.) Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No.
`3.4.) Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been receivedin this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`*“ See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1)
`
`Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`2) (J Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3)
`
`4)
`
`(LJ Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`(Qj Other:
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mail Date 20231207
`
`Application No.
`Applicant(s)
`17/585,919
`Ouraetal.
`
`Office Action Summary Art Unit|AIA (FITF)StatusExaminer
`ANNA KOROVINA
`1729
`Yes
`
`
`
`-- The MAILING DATEof this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORYPERIOD FOR REPLYIS SET TO EXPIRE 3 MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensionsof time may be available underthe provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply betimely filed after SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing
`date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, evenif timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term
`adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`1)™) Responsive to communication(s)filed on 08 September 2023.
`C) A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/werefiled on
`
`2a)() This action is FINAL. 2b)¥)This action is non-final.
`3) An election was madeby the applicant in responseto a restriction requirement set forth during the interview
`on
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`4)(2) Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Exparte Quayle, 1935 C.D. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/585,919
`Art Unit: 1729
`
`Page 2
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`Notice of Pre-AlA or AIA Status
`
`1.
`
`The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined
`
`underthe first inventor to file provisions of the AIA.
`
`2.
`
`In view of the appealbrief filed on 08 September 2023, PROSECUTION IS
`
`HEREBY REOPENED. A newgroundofrejection is set forth below.
`
`To avoid abandonmentof the application, appellant must exercise one of the
`
`following two options:
`
`(1) file a reply under 37 CFR 1.111 (if this Office action is non-final) or a reply
`
`under 37 CFR 1.113 (if this Office action is final); or,
`
`(2) initiate a new appealbyfiling a notice of appeal under 37 CFR 41.31 followed
`
`by an appeal brief under 37 CFR 41.37. The previously paid notice of appeal fee and
`
`appeal brief fee can be applied to the new appeal. If, however, the appeal fees setforth
`
`in 37 CFR 41.20 have beenincreased since they were previously paid, then appellant
`
`mustpaythe difference between the increased fees and the amountpreviously paid.
`
`A Supervisory Patent Examiner (SPE) has approved of reopening prosecution by
`
`signing below:
`
`/ULA C RUDDOCK/
`Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1729
`
`Responseto Arguments
`
`3.
`
`The previous 103 rejections are withdrawnin favor of a new ground of rejection
`
`based on newly foundart (Takada). Applicant's arguments with respect to the claims
`
`have been considered but are moot because the new groundof rejection does notrely
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/585,919
`Art Unit: 1729
`
`Page 3
`
`on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter
`
`specifically challenged in the argument.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`
`4.
`
`The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can
`
`be found in a prior Office action.
`
`5.
`
`Claims 1-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Inoue et
`
`al. (JP 2009-295474) in view of Takada (JP 2013-110100), Shiozaki (US
`
`2016/0190566), and lida (US 2015/0303484), hereinafter Inoue, Takada, Shiozaki and
`
`lida (only Takada is new).
`
`Regarding Claims 1-2 and 8, |noue teaches a secondarybattery (15)
`
`comprising a negative electrode, an electrolyte and a secondarybattery positive
`
`electrode, see e.g., Fig. 9, and paras. [0016], [0042] and [0060]. The secondary battery
`
`positive electrode comprises a positive electrode current collector (1), an intermediate
`
`layer (3) provided on the positive electrode current collector (see e.g., Fig. 3) anda
`
`positive electrode mixture layer (4) provided on the intermediate layer (3) and including
`
`a positive electrode active material (see e.g., paras. [0016], and [0035)).
`
`Inoue doesnot explicitly teach irregularities in the current collector having an
`
`average deptof 0.6 um or more(or 2.0 um or less) or whether projections of the
`
`irregularities of the positive electrode current collector penetrate an interface between
`
`the intermediate layer and the positive electrode mixture layer and projectinto the
`
`positive electrode mixture layer. However, Takada teachesan electrode with a current
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/585,919
`Art Unit: 1729
`
`Page 4
`
`collector 3a, on which an intermediate layer 3b and active material layer (not shown) are
`
`formed, Fig. 5. When the intermediate layer 3b is applied as a uniform layer, the
`
`resulting electrode is thick, [0007]. However, the electrode is made thinner when the
`
`intermediate layer(i.e., 1b) is placed in irregularities formed on the current collector; the
`
`irregularities having a depth of 0.6 um or more and 2.0 um or less (e.g., 0.3 um to 3
`
`um)), see e.g., (0008-0010, 0026, 0034], Figs. 1-2. In view of the foregoing, it would be
`
`obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art the current collector includesirregularities
`
`having a depth of 0.6 um or more (or 2.0 um or less), with the expectation of sufficiently
`
`adhering the intermediate layer, as suggested by Takada [0034]; moreover, it would be
`
`obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art the intermediate layer is inserted in the
`
`irregularities of the current collector with the expectation of making a thinner electrode,
`
`as suggested by Takada [0010], [0026], [0029].
`
`The combination of Inoue with Takada suggests the current collector includes
`
`irregularities (i.e., peaks and valleys, represented by a thick dot-dash line on current
`
`collector 1a in annotated in Fig. 1(b) of Takada below, where the peaks are considered
`
`projections of the current collector) and the intermediate layer of Inoue is place in the
`
`valleys of the irregularities of the current collector with the expectation of reducing
`
`electrode thickness.
`
`

`

`Page 5
`
`Application/Control Number: 17/585,919
`Art Unit: 1729
`
`
`
`Up to this point, the combination of Inoue and Takada suggests a surface of the
`
`intermediate layer (thin dashedline) is coplanar with a surface of the current collector
`
`(thick dotted line) , see annotated Fig. 2 of Takada below; hence, whenthe active
`
`material is placed on the current collector, a surface of the active material layer (thick
`
`line), a surface of the intermediate layer (thin dashed line), and a surface of the current
`
`collector (thick dotted line) are all coplanar, having a coplanarinterface (thick dashed
`
`line) between the intermediate layer (1b) and active material layer (2), see annotated
`
`Fig. 2 of Takada below.
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/585,919
`Art Unit: 1729
`
`Page 6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In view of the foregoing, the irregularities (i.e., peaks/projections) of the current collector
`
`do not penetrate an interface between the active material layer and intermediate layer,
`
`and the projections of the current collector do not project into the active material layer
`
`given the surface of each layer is coplanar. However, Inoue suggests roughening the
`
`intermediate layer; roughening of the intermediate later forms irregularities on the
`
`intermediate layer surface and allowsthe active material layer (4) to penetrate into the
`
`intermediate layer, thereby improving adhesion, see e.g., [0018-0019], [0057] and Figs.
`
`A roughening of the surface of the intermediate layer forms irregularities (i.e., peaks and
`
`valleys) on the surface of the intermediate layer (see Fig. 1 of Inoue); the valleys in the
`
`intermediate layer extend below the surface of the intermediate layer (hence below the
`
`surface of the current collector since both are coplanar) such that active material
`
`extends therein and forms a newinterface betweenthe active material layer and
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/585,919
`Art Unit: 1729
`
`Page 7
`
`intermediate layer (see “interface” in another annotated Fig. 2 of Takada below, whichis
`
`highlighted by the solid line across the bottom of the valleys of the intermediate layer).
`443 34444444444443d
`
`
`
`
`
`eddiedeed
`
`SnnnnNnAANnnngnnns
`
`
`
`win’OT% PIIIPLLLILLLLIPLITTELITFELL,
`
`Dreccesccscccocesecsettatisa, wa protrusion
`
`oe
`
`*
`
`,”
`
`{|eat v
`
`e
`
`e
`
`:Ss
`
`“
`
`inal
`
`f.
`
`jnter"face
`
`.f
`
`
`eLLMY
`
`j
`
`A roughening of the intermediate layer, as suggested by Inoue, is obvious in view of
`
`improved adhesion, and results in projections of the current collector to penetrate the
`
`interface betweenthe intermediate layer and the active material layer and the
`
`projections of the current collector project into the active material layer.
`
`Regarding Claims 1, 4, 6 and 7, Inoue teachesthe intermediate layer consists
`
`of a binder, but does not teach the intermediate layer consists of a binder and inorganic
`
`material particles (i.e., metal oxide, metal nitride, metal fluoride) having higher
`
`resistance(i.e., resistivity of 10'* OQ cm or more) than the positive electrode active
`
`material, wherein a median particle diameter of the inorganic material particles is 0.2 um
`
`or more and 1.0 um or less. However, Shiozaki teachesthe inclusion of inorganic
`
`material particles (e.g., manganese oxide, silicon dioxide, titanium dioxide, aluminum
`
`oxide) having higher resistance than the positive electrode active material in the
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/585,919
`Art Unit: 1729
`
`Page 8
`
`intermediate layer between the active material layer and currentcollector offers heat
`
`generation preventing effects; specifically, the intermediate layer having the heat
`
`generation preventing function consists of binder and inorganic material particles, see
`
`e.g., Battery B2, paras. [0027]-[0030], [0053], [0064]. It would be obvious to one having
`
`ordinaryskill in the art the intermediate layer of Inoue consists of a binder and inorganic
`
`material particles having higher resistance than the positive electrode active material
`
`with the expectation of heat generation preventing effects. Moreover,lida utilizes
`
`inorganic material particles (e.g., silica, alumina, titanium oxide, etc.) to achieve similar
`
`safety functions with respect heat generation; specifically, an intermediate layer
`
`including inorganic material particles is provided on the current collector to achieve a
`
`PTC characteristic (temperature resistance, hence preventing heat generation) during
`
`abnormal heat generation, thereby providing a safety function, wherein an average
`
`particle diameterof the inorganic particles in the intermediate layer is between 0.001 to
`
`10 micrometers, see e.g., paras. [0013], [0015], [0045], [0073]-[0074]. It would be
`
`obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art the average particle diameter of the
`
`inorganic material particles of Inoue, as modified by Shiozaki, is between 0.2 um to 1.0
`
`um with the expectation of heat generation preventing effects (i.e., temperature
`
`resistance), hence improved safety, as suggested bylida.
`
`Further regarding Claim 7, "[p]roducts of identical chemical composition can not
`
`have mutually exclusive properties." In re Spada, 911 F.2d 705, 709, 15 USPQ2d 1655,
`
`1658 (Fed. Cir. 1990). A chemical composition and its properties are inseparable.
`
`Therefore,if the prior art teaches the identical chemical structure, the properties
`
`applicant discloses and/or claims are necessarily present. See MPEP 2112.01. The
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/585,919
`Art Unit: 1729
`
`Page 9
`
`inorganic particles suggestedin the prior art (e.g., aluminum oxide, silicon oxide, etc.)
`
`are structurally/chemically identical to thoselisted in the instant published disclosure
`
`(see e.g., para. [0033]); thus, the prior art inherently teaches the claimed property(i.e.,
`
`resistivity of 10'* Q cm or more).
`
`Regarding Claim 3, as detailed above, Inoue was modified by Shiozaki andlida
`
`to teach the inclusion of inorganic material particles having a median particle diameter
`
`between 0.2 um to 1.0 um with the expectation of heat generation preventing effects
`
`(i.e., temperature resistance), hence improved safety. Additionally, the current collector
`
`of Inoue was modified by Takadato teachtheirregularities of the current collector
`
`having a depth of 0.6 um or more, with the expectation of sufficiently adhering the
`
`intermediate layer and minimizing electrode thickness. In view of the foregoing, the prior
`
`art suggests a ratio of median particle diameter of the inorganic particles to the average
`
`depth of the irregularities of the current collector is between 5:20(i.e., 0.25) to 5:6(i-e.,
`
`0.83); for example, 0.5 um/1pm = 0.5), as claimed. In the case where the claimed
`
`ranges "overlap or lie inside ranges disclosed by theprior art" a prima facie caseof
`
`obviousnessexists. In re Wertheim, 541 F.2d 257, 191 USPQ 90 (CCPA 1976); In re
`
`Woodruff, 919 F.2d 1575, 16 USPQ2d 1934 (Fed. Cir. 1990). Similarly, a prima facie
`
`case of obviousness exists where the claimed ranges or amounts do not overlap with
`
`the prior art but are merely close. Titanium Metals Corp. of America v. Banner, 778 F.2d
`
`775, 783, 227 USPQ 773, 779 (Fed. Cir. 1985). See also MPEP 2144.05.
`
`Regarding Claim 5, |noue doesnotexplicitly disclose a length of recesses of the
`
`current collector in contact with the intermediate layer with respect to a length of the
`
`projections of the current collector in contact with the active material is 0.8 or more and
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/585,919
`Art Unit: 1729
`
`Page 10
`
`1.8 or less. However, such a feature appears to be the result of routine experimentation
`
`and/or optimization; a known result-effective variable would be motivation for a person
`
`of ordinary skill in the art to experiment to reach another workable product, MPEP
`
`2144.02, Il.
`
`Inoue was modified by Takadato teach a plurality of irregularities on the surface
`
`of the current collector wherein an average depth of the plurality of irregularities is 0.6
`
`um or more and 2 micrometers or less to enhanced adhesion between the current
`
`collector and layers thereon. (see e.g., the rejection of claim 1). Further, Inoue teaches
`
`completely or partially covering the current collector with the intermediate layer effects
`
`the adhesion of the active material layer thereon and battery performance(e.g.,
`
`capacity retention after 500 cycles, low temperature discharge capacity), see e.g., Table
`
`1. That is, when the intermediate layer completely covers the current collector, no part
`
`of the current collector is exposed to the active material layer, thereby making the length
`
`of projections in contact with the active material layer zero, while the length of the
`
`recess in contact with the intermediate is equal to the entire depth of the irregularity,
`
`and leads to high adhesion, but decreased low temperature discharge capacity
`
`compared to an example with no resin layer (see e.g., Comparison examples 1 and 2 in
`
`Table 1). On the other hand, only partially covering the current collector with the
`
`intermediate layer (e.g., 5 % to 80%, Examples 1-4 in Table 1) allows the surface of the
`
`current collector to be partially exposed, and directly contacting with active material
`
`layer. Inoue teachesincreasing the contact area between the current collector and
`
`active material layer, which results from lower coverageof the intermediate layer,is
`
`desirable from the view point of battery performance (higher capacity retention and
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/585,919
`Art Unit: 1729
`
`Page 11
`
`higher low temperature discharge capacity) due to smaller electrical contact resistance
`
`(paras. [0018], and [0054]-[0057] and Table 1, see Example 3 comparedto
`
`Comparative Examples 1-2). That is, Inoue has realized the coverage of the
`
`intermediate layeris a result effective variable with respect to adhesion strength(i.e.,
`
`moreor less intermediate layerfills the recesses (irregularities) of the current collector),
`
`and contact area between the current collector and active material layer is a result
`
`effective variable with respect to battery performance (capacity retention and low
`
`temperature discharge). It would be obvious to one having ordinaryskill in the art to
`
`modify the length of the projections of the current collector in contact with the active
`
`material with respect to the length of the recessesin contact with the intermediate layer
`
`with the expectation of effecting the surface area contact of the current collector with the
`
`active material and adhesion strength between the current collector and active material
`
`layer, thereby effecting battery performance.
`
`6.
`
`Claims 3 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Inoue,
`
`Takada, Shiozaki andlida, further in view of Takeuchi (WO2012128274, of record),
`
`Takeuchi.
`
`The features of claim 3 are obvious over Inoue, Takada, Shiozaki and lida, as
`
`detailed above; they are further supported by Takeuchi. Specifically, Takeuchi teaches
`
`a current collector 3 with irregularities thereon (see Fig. 4 which shows concave
`
`recesses and convexportions); the current collector includes an intermediate layer
`
`(PTC layer 2) comprising particles (12, 13) on the irregularities of the current collector
`
`and an active material layer (1) on the intermediate layer (2), see e.g., Fig. 4 and lines
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/585,919
`Art Unit: 1729
`
`Page 12
`
`93-140, 207-215, 231-238, and 264-270. The particles have a particle size smaller than
`
`the roughening of the current collector, such that the particlesfill the recesses of the
`
`roughened surface and more effectively cut current due to an increasein electrical
`
`resistance when the battery temperature rises, thereby improving safety, see e.g., lines
`
`137-140, 152-0162, and 239-252. In view of the foregoing, Takeuchi supports the ratio
`
`of the particle diameterof the inorganic particles to the average depth of the
`
`irregularities of the current collector is between 5:20 (i.e., 0.25) to 5:6 (i.e., 0.83), as
`
`suggested by Inoue, Takada, Shiozaki andlida, from the view point of increasing
`
`electrical resistance to improvesafety.
`
`Conclusion
`
`7.
`
`Anyinquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the
`
`examiner should be directed to ANNA KOROVINA whosetelephone numberis
`
`(571)272-9835. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 7am - 6 pm.
`
`Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video
`
`conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-basedcollaboration tool. To schedule an
`
`interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request
`
`(AIR) at http:/Avwww.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
`
`If attempts to reach the examinerby telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's
`
`supervisor, Ula Ruddock can be reached on 5712721481. The fax phone numberfor
`
`the organization wherethis application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be
`
`obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Centeris
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/585,919
`Art Unit: 1729
`
`Page 13
`
`available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center,
`
`visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https:/Awww.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-
`
`center for more information about Patent Center and
`
`https:/Awww.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information aboutfiling in DOCX format. For
`
`additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197
`
`(toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service
`
`Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA)or 571-272-1000.
`
`/ANNA KOROVINA/
`Examiner, Art Unit 1729
`
`/ULA C RUDDOCK/
`Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1729
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket