throbber
www.uspto.gov
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and TrademarkOffice
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`17/838,961
`
`06/13/2022
`
`Ken YANAI
`
`083710-3658
`
`4797
`
`McDermott Will and Emery LLP
`The McDermott Building
`500 North Capitol Street, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20001
`
`PHAN, THIEM D
`
`3729
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`04/24/2023
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`Thetime period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the
`following e-mail address(es):
`
`mweipdocket@mwe.com
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`

`

`Office Action Summary
`
`Application No.
`17/838,961
`Examiner
`THIEM D PHAN
`
`Applicant(s)
`YANAI et al.
`Art Unit
`3729
`
`AIA (FITF) Status
`Yes
`
`-- The MAILING DATEof this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address --
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLYIS SET TO EXPIRE 3 MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available underthe provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply betimely filed after SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing
`date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHSfrom the mailing date of this communication.
`-
`- Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, evenif timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term
`adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`
`
`1) Responsive to communication(s) filed on 3/10/23.
`C} A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/werefiled on
`2a)[¥) This action is FINAL.
`2b) (J This action is non-final.
`3)02 An election was madeby the applicant in responseto a restriction requirement set forth during the interview
`on
`; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`4)\0) Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Exparte Quayle, 1935 C.D. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims*
`1-10 is/are pending in the application.
`)
`Claim(s)
`5a) Of the above claim(s) 1 is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`[) Claim(s)__ is/are allowed.
`Claim(s) 2-10 is/are rejected.
`(1 Claim(s)__is/are objectedto.
`C] Claim(s)
`are subjectto restriction and/or election requirement
`“If any claims have been determined allowable, you maybeeligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a
`participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`http:/Awww.uspto.gov/patents/init_events/pph/index.jsp or send an inquiry to PPHfeedback@uspto.gov.
`
`) ) ) )
`
`Application Papers
`10)() The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`11)M The drawing(s)filed on 6/13/22 is/are: a) accepted or b)C) objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`12)[¥] Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f).
`Certified copies:
`c)() None ofthe:
`b)( Some**
`a) All
`1.2 Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`2.¥} Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No. 16/622,572.
`3.0.) Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been receivedin this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`* See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment(s)
`
`1) ([] Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`
`2) (J Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`3)
`
`(LJ Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date
`4) (J Other:
`
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 11-13)
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mail Date 20230418
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/838,961
`Art Unit: 3729
`
`Page 2
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`1.
`
`The amendment filed on 03/10/23 has been fully considered and made of record.
`
`Notice of Pre-AlA or AIA Status
`
`2.
`
`The present application, filed on or after January 11, 2023, is being examined
`
`under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
`
`3.
`
`The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that
`
`form the basis for the rejections under this section madein this Office action:
`
`A person shall be entitled to a patent unless —
`
`(a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use,
`on sale or otherwiseavailable to the public before the effectivefiling date of the claimed
`invention.
`
`4.
`
`Claims 2-4 and 6-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated
`
`by Haruki et al (US 2012/0236462).
`
`Regarding claim 2, Haruki et al teach a ceramic multilayer electronic component
`
`(Fig. 4, 10) configured to be mounted to a mounting body (50), the multilayer electronic
`
`component comprising:
`
`e
`
`an individual component (12) including:
`
`o asintered body (16) including an internal electrode (28) provided therein,
`
`and
`
`o
`
`an external electrode (36) provided on a side surface of the sintered body,
`
`the first external electrode (36a or 36b) being connected to the internal
`
`electrode (28a or 28b);
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/838,961
`Art Unit: 3729
`
`Page 3
`
`e
`
`e
`
`abonding layer (44) provided on the external electrode; and
`
`alead terminal (40a) connected to the external terminal (86a) via the bonding
`
`layer (44), the lead terminal (40a) having a plate shape (42a), wherein:
`
`e
`
`the individual component (12) has a mount surface (18b) facing a mounting body
`
`(50) while the multilayer electronic component (10) is mounted to the mounting
`
`body (50), and
`
`e
`
`the bonding layer (Fig. 4 & 7, 44) extends along the lead terminal (88a) from the
`
`external electrode (36a) toward the mounting body (50) beyond a portion (See
`
`Fig. 7 Below, Gap) of the mount surface (Bottom of 36a) of the individual
`
`component whichis closest to the mounting body while the multilayer electronic
`
`component is mounted to the mounting body.
`
`FIG. 7
`
`19 36a"? 14 180
`38a~ T x
`\, \ |/
`E.7
`40a" |
`E. ~
`
`A2a
`
`Ee
`44ers
`Gap
`
`20a 205 op
`
`o
`
`Regarding claim 3, Haruki et al teach that the bonding layer contains solder (44;
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/838,961
`Art Unit: 3729
`
`Para. 0038, line 4).
`
`Page 4
`
`Regarding claim 4, Haruki et al teach that the lead terminal (38) is bent to have
`
`an L-shape (42a or 42b).
`
`Regarding claim 6, Haruki et al teach that the portion of the mount surface
`
`(Bottom of 36a) of the individual componentis located at the external electrode (38).
`
`Regarding claim 7, Haruki et al teach a ceramic multilayer electronic component
`
`(Fig. 4, 10) configured to be mounted to a mounting body (50), the multilayer electronic
`
`component comprising:
`
`e
`
`an individual component (12) including:
`
`o asintered body (16) including an internal electrode (28) provided therein,
`
`and
`
`o
`
`an external electrode (36) provided on a side surface of the sintered body,
`
`the external electrode (36a or 36b) being connected to the internal
`
`e
`
`e
`
`electrode (28a or 28b);
`
`abonding layer (44) provided on the external electrode; and
`
`alead terminal (40a) connected to the external terminal (86a) via the bonding
`
`layer (44), the lead terminal having a plate shape (42a), wherein:
`
`e
`
`the individual component (10) has a mount surface (18b & Bottom of 36a) facing
`
`the mounting body (50) while the multilayer electronic component (10) is
`
`mounted to the mounting body (50), the mount surface including a part of the
`
`external electrode (36), and
`
`e
`
`the bonding layer (Fig. 4 & 7, 44) extends along the lead terminal (38a) from the
`
`external electrode (36a) toward the mounting body (50) beyond anentirety (See
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/838,961
`Art Unit: 3729
`
`Page 5
`
`Fig. 7 Above, Gap) of the mount surface (Bottom Of 36a).
`
`Regarding claim 8, Haruki et al teach that the bonding layer (44) contains
`
`solder.
`
`Regarding claim 9, Haruki et al teach that the lead terminal (38) is bent to have
`
`an L-shape (42a or 42b).
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`
`5.
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all
`
`obviousnessrejections setforth in this Office action:
`
`A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed
`invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of thistitle, if the differences
`between the claimed invention andthe prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole
`would have been obvious before the effectivefiling date of the claimed invention to a person
`having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not
`be negated by the manner in whichthe invention was made.
`
`6.
`
`Claims 5 and 10 are rejected under AIA 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable
`
`over Haruki et al in view of Yoshida et al (JP2000164406).
`
`Regarding claims 5 and 10, Haruki et al teach a ceramic multilayer electronic
`
`component (Fig. 4, 10) configured to be mounted to a mounting body (50), which reads
`
`on applicant’s claimed invention.
`
`However, Haruki et al fail to teach that the individual component (12) further
`
`includes an insulating layer provided on the sintered body.
`
`Yoshida et al teach a chip type electronic part (Fig. 1, 1; Abstract) with an
`
`insulating layer (4a) provided on the sintered body, in order to protect the ceramic
`
`element from the corrosion atmosphere (Abstract, lines 1-4).
`
`It would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the effective
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/838,961
`Art Unit: 3729
`
`Page 6
`
`filing date of the claimed invention to modify the ceramic multilayer electronic
`
`component of Haruki et al by applying the insulating layer (4a) provided on the sintered
`
`body, as taught by Yoshidaetal, in order to protect the ceramic element from the
`
`corrosion atmosphere.
`
`Responseto Arguments
`
`7.
`
`Applicants’ arguments with respect to claim 2 have been considered but are
`
`moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any issue in the reference
`
`applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged
`
`in the argument.
`
`Conclusion
`
`8.
`
`The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to
`
`applicants’ disclosure.
`
`Applicants’ amendment necessitated the new grounds of rejection presented in
`
`this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a).
`
`Applicants are reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
`
`A shortenedstatutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE
`
`
`
`MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the eventafirst reply is filed within
`
`TWO MONTHS ofthe mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not
`
`mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortenedstatutory period, then the
`
`shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any
`
`extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 17/838,961
`Art Unit: 3729
`
`Page 7
`
`the advisory action.
`
`In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later
`
`than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date ofthis final action.
`
`9.
`
`Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the
`
`examiner should be directed to THIEM D PHAN whosetelephone number is (571)272-
`
`4568. The examiner can normally be reached on Mo-Fr: 8AM-4PM.
`
`If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s
`
`supervisor, Peter Vo can be reached on 571-272-4690. The fax phone number for the
`
`organization wherethis application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
`
`Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the
`
`Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published
`
`applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status
`
`information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For
`
`more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you
`
`have questions on accessto the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business
`
`Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197(toll-free).
`
`/THIEM D PHAN/
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3729
`
`April 19, 2023
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket