• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Displaying 1599-1613 of 745,420 results

Turner et al v. LG Chem, Ltd. et al

Docket 3:12-cv-02658, Judicial Panel On Multidistrict Litigation (Mar. 7, 2013)
Judge Joseph R. Goodwin, presiding
FlagsCLOSED, CTO_FINAL
Defendant Panasonic Corporation
Defendant Panasonic Corporation of North America
...
cite Cite Docket

PRESSIT

Docket 88926017, Trademark (May 20, 2020)
Case TypeTrademark
ClassTelecommunication machines and apparatus, namely, audio and video frequency transmission apparatus in the nature of audio and video frequency transformers; Wireless communication device featuring voice, data and image transmission; Digital media streaming devices; Downloadable computer software for controlling the operation of wireless communication devices; Downloadable computer software for data streaming via digital media streaming devices; Downloadable computer software for controlling the display and playback of video and audio recorders; 021; 023; 026; 036; 038
MarksPRESSIT
Original Registrant Panasonic Corporation
Subsequent Owner After Registration PANASONIC HOLDINGS CORPORATION
cite Cite Docket

Optical Devices LLC v. Panasonic Corporation et al

Docket 1:13-cv-00726, Delaware District Court (Apr. 25, 2013)
Judge Leonard P. Stark, presiding
Patent
DivisionWilmington
FlagsCLOSED, PATENT
DemandPlaintiff
Cause35:271 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Defendant Panasonic Corporation
Defendant Panasonic Corporation of North America
...
cite Cite Docket

3

Document Jeske Vs Panasonic Consumer P Roduct Su, SC-000616-21, No. 3 (New Jersey State, Superior Court, Bergen County Jun. 30, 2021)
_______________, 2021, ORDERED that this matter is hereby It is on this ______ day of dismissed/disposed due to the following:
o WITH PREJUDICE o WITHOUT PREJUDICE
It is further ORDERED that the plaintiff/defendant shall serve a copy of the ORDER on the plaintiff/defendant within (10) days of the above date.
Joseph G. Monaghan, J.S.C.
cite Cite Document

HEARTMOTIVE

Docket 88858485, Trademark (April 3, 2020)
ClassElectric motors other than for land vehicles; Electricity generators; AC generators; DC generators; Compressors for machines; 013; 019; 021; 023; 024; 031; 034; 035; 021; 023; 026; 036; 038; 013; 021; 023; 024; 031; 034; 019; 021; 023; 031; 035; 044; 100; 101
MarksHEARTMOTIVE
Original Registrant Panasonic Corporation
Subsequent Owner After Registration PANASONIC AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS CO., LTD.
Subsequent Owner After Registration PANASONIC HOLDINGS CORPORATION
cite Cite Docket

Walner v. Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. et al

Docket 4:13-cv-01298, California Northern District Court (Mar. 22, 2013)
Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, presiding
Anti-Trust
DivisionOakland
Cause15:1 Antitrust Litigation
Case Type410 Anti-Trust
Tags410 Anti-Trust, 410 Anti-Trust
Defendant Panasonic Corporation
Defendant Panasonic Corporation of North America
...
cite Cite Docket

No. 537612816 - OGMANSI - Order Granting Motion to Answer Interrogatories

Document Unifund Ccr V Gonzalez, 20D03-0711-CC-00411, No. 537612816 (Indiana State, Elkhart County, Superior Court Sep. 11, 2019)
The garnishee defendant 1ST SOURCE BANK is now ordered to answer under oath the interrogatories set forth below or attached in writing on or before ______________, or, at your option, appear in Court and answer the interrogatories in person at the hearing.
Any claim or defense to the proceedings supplemental or garnishment order must be presented at the time and place of the hearing specified herein.
It is further ordered that garnishee defendant, a depository financial institution, is to place a 90-day hold on any deposit accounts in which the judgment defendant, JUAN G GONZALEZ, has an interest, either individually or jointly with another person, pursuant to IC 28-9-4-2, upon receipt of the documents, payment, and process required under subdivisions (1) through (5) of IC 28-9-3-4(b).
SHERIFF shall serve this Proceedings Supplemental as follows: ___ personal service _X_ leaving a copy at dwelling or place of employment CLERK shall serve the Proceedings Supplemental as follows: ___ regular mail ___ certified mail
SHERIFF shall serve this Proceedings Supplemental as follows, ___ personal service ___ leaving a copy at dwelling or place of business CLERK shall serve the Proceedings Supplemental as follows: ___ personal service by attorney ___ private process server, ___ other (describe in particular and note Trial Rule) _X_ certified mail OTHER manner of service: __attorney to serve __ private process server, __ other (describe in particular and note Trial Rule) J. Louis Kurtzer (19831-15) Unifund CCR Partners Assignee of Palisades Collection, LLC
cite Cite Document

No. 537611942 - OTA - Order to Appear

Document Unifund Ccr V Gonzalez, 20D03-0711-CC-00411, No. 537611942 (Indiana State, Elkhart County, Superior Court Sep. 11, 2019)
It may be that the Plaintiff has or will give notice to your bank or other persons holding properly or assets for you of the intent to put a hold on certain accounts held by you, either individually or jointly with another person, including but not limited to bank, share, and credit union accounts held by you, either individually or jointly with another person, including, but not limited to bank, share and credit union accounts.
If you call the court to determine your hearing date, please use the case number located at the top right-hand side of the front of this document.
However, if a joint depositor or you do not request an early hearing, each account on which a hold has been placed may not be released until the time you are ordered to appear.
SHERIFF shall serve this Proceedings Supplemental as follows: ___ personal service _X_ leaving a copy at dwelling or place of employment
SHERIFF shall serve this Proceedings Supplemental as follows, ___ personal service ___ leaving a copy at dwelling or place of business CLERK shall serve the Proceedings Supplemental as follows: ___ regular mail (Superior Court only) ___ certified mail CLERK shall serve the Proceedings Supplemental as follows: ___ personal service by attorney ___ private process server, ___ other (describe in particular and note Trial Rule) _X_ certified mail OTHER manner of service: __attorney to serve __ private process server, __ other (describe in particular and note Trial Rule) J. Louis Kurtzer (19831-15) Unifund CCR Partners Assignee of Palisades Collection, LLC
cite Cite Document

Notice of Hearing Sent - Notice of Trial Setting Conference and Notice of Case Assignment

Document Neil Alan Miller and Zenaida G. Miller -v- Florentina Roman et al, CIVSB2128144, No. 11-04-21-Notice_of_Hearing_Sent (California State, San Bernardino County, Superior Court Nov. 4, 2021)
Law Offices of Justin H King 8301 Utica Avenue Suite 101 Rancho Cucamonga CA 91730 This case has been assigned to: S28 Unassigned in Department S28 - SBJC for all purposes.
Notice is hereby given that the above-entitled case has been setfor Trial Setting Conference on: Hearing Date: 05/03/2022 at 9:00 AM in Department S28 - SBJC The Trial Setting Conferencewill be held in chambers without the appearanceof the parties — except for good cause shown.
Parties shall file and serve nolater than 15 daysprior to the trial setting conference the mandatory Initial Trial Setting Conference Statementform (local form #13-09001-360) included with this notice.
Prior to the date of the initial trial setting conference, the court may entertain a written stipulation by all appearing parties to continue theinitial trial setting conferenceif filed at least 30 days prior to the conference.
Date: 11/4/2021 Nancy CS Eberhardt, Court Executive Officer
cite Cite Document

2

Document Jeske Vs Panasonic Consumer P Roduct Su, SC-000616-21, No. 2 (New Jersey State, Superior Court, Bergen County Jun. 25, 2021)
This Settlement Agreement and Release is made and entered into as of June 16, 2021, by and between Kenneth Jeske and Panasonic Corporation of North America (PNA).
Upon receipt of the Settlement Agreement and Release signed by Mr. Jeske, Panasonic (PNA)will issue a refund check in the amount of $287,23 which includes court costs of $42.00.
Mr. Jeske, and his heirs and assigns, hereby releases and forever discharge PNAandits officers, directors, shareholders, employees, agents, parents, subsidiaries, affiliates and representatives from any andall claims, demands, debts,liabilities and causes of action at law or in equity, known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, which Mr. Jeske has, ever had or now has or may have against PNArelatingto, arising out of or resulting from any matters in connection with the microwave model NN-SD9878S listed in this action.
Mr. Jeske understandsthat this Settlement Agreement and Release constitutes a full and final settlement and extendsto all claims of every nature, known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, arising from or attributable to any practices or conduct by PNA,relating directly or indirectly to the Panasonic Microwave Oven NN-SD987S.
8 Mr. Jeske executes this Settlement Agreement and Release voluntarily and without any duress or undueinfluence with the full intent of dismissing his claim under case number SC-616-21 prior to the court date to be set for June 30, 2021.
cite Cite Document

Graphics Properties Holdings Inc. v. Panasonic Corporation of North America et al

Docket 1:13-cv-00865, Delaware District Court (May 17, 2013)
Leonard P. Stark, presiding
Patent
DemandPlaintiff
Cause35:271 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Panasonic Corporation of North America
...
cite Cite Docket

Sharp Electronics Corporation et al v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al

Docket CAN/3:13-cv-01173, Judicial Panel On Multidistrict Litigation (Mar. 15, 2013)
U.S. District Judge Jon S. Tigar, presiding
Defendant Panasonic Corporation
Defendant Panasonic Corporation of North America
Defendant Panasonic Consumer Electronics Co.
...
cite Cite Docket

Ames et al v. LG Chem Ltd. et al

Docket 4:13-cv-01194, California Northern District Court (Mar. 18, 2013)
Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, presiding
Anti-Trust
DivisionOakland
Cause15:1 Antitrust Litigation
Case Type410 Anti-Trust
Tags410 Anti-Trust, 410 Anti-Trust
Defendant Panasonic Corporation
Defendant Panasonic Corporation of North America
...
cite Cite Docket

USA v. In the Matter of One Gateway Computer Tower, a Panasonic video camera and Iphone

Docket 2:13-mj-00836, Wisconsin Eastern District Court (May 14, 2013)
05/14/2013
Search Warrant Returned Executed
05/14/2013
Application and Affidavit for Search Warrant
cite Cite Docket

Marcus et al v. LG Chem, LTD. et al

Docket 4:13-cv-00339, California Northern District Court (Jan. 24, 2013)
Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, presiding
Anti-Trust
DivisionOakland
Cause15:15 Antitrust Litigation
Case Type410 Anti-Trust
Tags410 Anti-Trust, 410 Anti-Trust
Defendant Panasonic Corporation
Defendant Panasonic Corporation of North America
...
cite Cite Docket
<< 1 2 3 4 5 ... 107 108 109 110 111 ... >>