• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Displaying 1224-1238 of 50,000 results

The People of the State of California acting by and through the Department of Tran...

Docket 37-2013-00064733-CU-EI-CTL, California State, San Diego County, Superior Court (Aug. 28, 2013)
DivisionCentral
Case TypeEminent domain/Inverse condemnation
Defendant PANASONIC APPLIANCES REFRIGERATION SYSTEMS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
...
cite Cite Docket

Nexus Display Technologies LLC v. Panasonic Corporation of North America

Docket 2:14-cv-00764, Texas Eastern District Court (July 11, 2014)
Robert W. Schroeder, III, presiding
Patent
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Panasonic Corporation of North America
...
cite Cite Docket

(1) Notice of Ground Rules; (2) Setting Preliminary Conference No. 738348

Document Certain IP Camera Systems including Video Doorbells and Components Thereof, 337-1242, No. 738348-1 (U.S.I.T.C. Mar. 30, 2021)
A. formulating and simplifying the issues, and eliminating frivolous claims or defenses; B. amending the pleadings if necessary or desirable; C. obtaining admissions and stipulations about facts and documents to avoid unnecessary proof, and ruling in advance on the admissibility of evidence; D. avoiding unnecessary proof and cumulative evidence; E. controlling and scheduling discovery, including discovery involving non-parties; F. identifying witnesses and documents, and setting dates for further conferences if necessary; G. settlement and mediation; H. disposing of pending motions; I. adopting special procedures for managing potentially difficult or protracted actions that may involve complex issues, multiple parties, difficult legal questions, or unusual proof problems, including the possible consolidation or severance of proceedings; and J. facilitating in other ways the just, speedy, and inexpensive disposition of the action.
In addition to the requirements of Commission Rule 210.32(d), any motion to limit or quash a subpoena shall be filed within ten (10) days after receipt thereof, or within such other time as the Administrative Law Judge may allow.
Due to the time limitations imposed by section 337, counsel shall attempt to resolve, by stipulation or negotiated agreement, any procedural problems encountered, including those relating to discovery and submission of evidence.
TAKE NOTICE: By authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. § 1337), 5 U.S.C. § 556(c)(2), and pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 210.32 of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of the United States International Trade Commission, and upon an application for subpoena made by [“complainant” / “respondent”/ etc., followed by name of company], YOU ARE HEREBY ORDERED to produce at , or at such other time and place agreed upon, all of the documents and things in your possession, custody or control which are listed and described in Attachment A hereto.
TAKE NOTICE: By authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. § 1337), 5 U.S.C. § 556(c)(2), and pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 210.32 of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of the United States International Trade Commission, and upon an application for subpoena made by [“complainant” / “respondent”/ etc., followed by name of company], YOU ARE HEREBY ORDERED to present yourself for purposes of your deposition upon oral examination on , by televideo means or at such other time and place agreed on, concerning the subject matter set forth in Attachment A hereto.
cite Cite Document

Assignment of ALJ Cheney No. 738224

Document Certain IP Camera Systems including Video Doorbells and Components Thereof, 337-1242, No. 738224-1 (U.S.I.T.C. Mar. 29, 2021)
Washington, D.C.
In the Matter of
(March 29, 2021) Notice is hereby given that the above-captioned investigation under section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1337, is reassigned to Administrative Law Judge Clark S. Cheney.
cite Cite Document

Equal Employment v. Panasonic Industrial

Docket 1:86-cv-00251, Georgia Northern District Court (Feb. 4, 1986)
Marvin H. Shoob, presiding
Panasonic Industrial
...
cite Cite Docket

Siliconix Incorporated v. Denso Corporation et al

Docket 3:05-cv-01507, California Northern District Court (Apr. 13, 2005)
William Alsup, presiding, Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero
Patent
DemandBoth
Cause35:145 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Defendant Panasonic Corporation of North America
...
cite Cite Docket

Sanchez v. Panasonic Corporatio

Docket 5:06-cv-00116, Texas Western District Court (Feb. 8, 2006)
Fred Biery, presiding
Panasonic Corporatio
...
cite Cite Docket

Panasonic Automotive Electronics Company v. United States

Docket 1:00-cv-00379, Court of International Trade (Aug. 2, 2000)
Jane A. Restani, presiding
DivisionNew York
Panasonic Automotive Electronics Company
...
cite Cite Docket

Moreno v. Panasonic Con.

Docket 1:03-cv-00559, New York Southern District Court (Jan. 27, 2003)
Denise L. Cote, presiding, Henry B. Pitman
Panasonic Con.
...
cite Cite Docket

HILTON et al v. PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA

Docket 2:07-cv-01536, New Jersey District Court (Apr. 2, 2007)
Patty Shwartz, presiding
DivisionNewark
Panasonic Corporation of North America
...
cite Cite Docket

WINTER v. PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA

Docket 2:09-cv-04456, New Jersey District Court (Aug. 28, 2009)
Stanley R. Chesler, presiding, M. A. Shipp

cite Cite Docket

Panasonic Disc Manufacturing Corporation of America v. United States

Docket 1:03-cv-00343, Court of International Trade (June 4, 2003)
Jane A. Restani, presiding.

cite Cite Docket

Panasonic Factory v. ADS Elec Inc

Docket 1:00-cv-05361, Illinois Northern District Court (Aug. 30, 2000)
James F. Holderman, presiding.

cite Cite Docket

Luscher et al v. Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. et al

Docket 2:08-cv-00055, Arizona District Court (Jan. 10, 2008)
Frederick J Martone, presiding, Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson
Anti-Trust

cite Cite Docket

Richey v. Panasonic Corporation of North America

Docket 6:08-cv-00212, Texas Western District Court (July 30, 2008)
Walter S. Smith, presiding.

cite Cite Docket
<< 1 2 3 4 5 ... 82 83 84 85 86 ... >>