Docket
90285148,
Trademark
(Oct. 28, 2020)
Cite Docket
AVC INTRA, 90285148 (Trademark)
+ More Snippets
Document
IPR2021-01061, No. 15 Institution Decision Grant - DECISION Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review 35 USC § 314 (P.T.A.B. Jan. 12, 2022)
After considering the parties’ arguments and evidence, we determine that Petitioner has shown a reasonable likelihood that it will prevail with respect to at least one claim challenged in the Petition, and we do not exercise our discretion to deny institution.
Petitioner cannot satisfy its burden of proving obviousness by employing “mere conclusory statements,” but “must instead articulate specific reasoning, based on evidence of record, to support the legal conclusion of obviousness.” In re Magnum Oil Tools Int’l, Ltd., 829 F.3d 1364, 1380 (Fed. Cir. 2016).
Accordingly, after considering the Petition and the Preliminary Response, we determine that Petitioner establishes a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on its challenge to claim 8 of the ’034 Patent based on Ochiai and Ando.
Furthermore, we are not persuaded that Petitioner establishes a sufficient link between the limitation of claim 7 (“the second insulation film contacts the source electrode”) and Petitioner’s asserted reasons for modifying Ochiai (improve opening ratio and increased storage capacitance).
After considering the Petition and the Preliminary Response, we determine that the information presented establishes a reasonable likelihood that Petitioner would prevail in showing that at least one claim of the ’034 Patent is unpatentable.
Cite Document
IPR2021-01061, No. 15 Institution Decision Grant - DECISION Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review 35 USC § 314 (P.T.A.B. Jan. 12, 2022)
+ More Snippets
Document
IPR2021-01061, No. 16 Order Other - SCHEDULING ORDER (P.T.A.B. Jan. 12, 2022)
Cite Document
IPR2021-01061, No. 16 Order Other - SCHEDULING ORDER (P.T.A.B. Jan. 12, 2022)
+ More Snippets
Document
In re Panasonic Corporation, 88976143, No. 4 (T.T.A.B. Jun. 9, 2020)
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board P.O.
Mailed: June 9, 2020 In re Panasonic Corporation Serial No. 88976143 Filed: 1/29/2019 By the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board: Applicant filed its notice of appeal with the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board on March 27, 2020.
It has come to the Board’s attention that this application has been approved for publication on April 21, 2020, thereby resolving the issues on appeal.
In view thereof, the appeal is dismissed as moot.
Cite Document
In re Panasonic Corporation, 88976143, No. 4 (T.T.A.B. Jun. 9, 2020)
+ More Snippets
Document
JOHN D. FERNANDEZ, ET AL. VS GENERAL ELECTRIC CO., ET AL., 21STCV30158, Notice of Posting of Jury (Los Angeles Sup. Ct Oct. 1, 2021)
Clerk's Office, Room Department Number SSC15 Amt.
Credit Card Certified Check/Money Order Check To be paid via: Cash On or before: Forthwith
Honeywell International Inc., f/k/a AlliedSignal Inc., Successor-in-Interest to The Bendix Corporation SHERRI R. CARTER, Executive Officer/Clerk
Depositor's Name: McDermott Will & Emery LLP Defendant in Pro Per Plaintiff in Pro Per Plaintiff Counsel for Name of Party Honeywell International Inc., f/k/a AlliedSignal Inc., Successor-in-Interest to The Bendix Corporation Name of Party Defendant Address of depositor 2049 Century Park East Suite 3200 Street Los Angeles, CA 90067-3206 City/State/Zip LACIV 083 (Rev.
Distribution: Original - Case File Copy - Customer American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 10/01/2021 12:27 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by C. Perez,Deputy Clerk
Cite Document
JOHN D. FERNANDEZ, ET AL. VS GENERAL ELECTRIC CO., ET AL., 21STCV30158, Notice of Posting of Jury (Los Angeles Sup. Ct Oct. 1, 2021)
+ More Snippets
Docket
90235849,
Trademark
(Oct. 5, 2020)
Class | Organization of contests relating to sports; Arranging of contests relating to sports; Conducting of contests relating to sports; 100; 101; 107 |
Marks | SPORTS CHANGE MAKERS |
Original Applicant | Panasonic Corporation |
Original Registrant | PANASONIC HOLDINGS CORPORATION |
Cite Docket
SPORTS CHANGE MAKERS, 90235849 (Trademark)
+ More Snippets
Docket
90687616,
Trademark
(May 3, 2021)
Cite Docket
WHISPERLINE, 90687616 (Trademark)
+ More Snippets
Document
Neil Alan Miller and Zenaida G. Miller -v- Florentina Roman et al, CIVSB2128144, No. 05-31-22-Summons_Issued_and_Filed (California State, San Bernardino County, Superior Court May. 31, 2...
Cite Document
Neil Alan Miller and Zenaida G. Miller -v- Florentina Roman et al, CIVSB2128144, No. 05-31-22-Summons_Issued_and_Filed (California State, San Bernardino County, Superior Court May. 31, 2022)
+ More Snippets
Document
In re Panasonic Avionics Corporation, 88352905, No. 2 (T.T.A.B. Jun. 1, 2020)
Cite Document
In re Panasonic Avionics Corporation, 88352905, No. 2 (T.T.A.B. Jun. 1, 2020)
+ More Snippets
Docket
1:13-cv-12344,
Massachusetts District Court
(Sept. 20, 2013)
Chief Judge Patti B. Saris,
presiding.
Patent
Cite Docket
Trustees of Boston University v. Panasonic Corp. et al, 1:13-cv-12344 (D.Mass.)
+ More Snippets
Document
Kelly M. Kope, Relator, vs. Panasonic Avionics Corp, Respondent, Department of Employment and Economic Development, Respondent., A21-0760, 1158268 (Minn. Ct. App. Jul. 9, 2021)
Cite Document
Kelly M. Kope, Relator, vs. Panasonic Avionics Corp, Respondent, Department of Employment and Economic Development, Respondent., A21-0760, 1158268 (Minn. Ct. App. Jul. 9, 2021)
+ More Snippets
Docket
337-897,
United States International Trade Commission
(Sept. 3, 2013)
Dee Lord,
presiding.
Cite Docket
Certain Optical Disc Drives, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same, 337-897 (U.S.I.T.C.)
+ More Snippets
Docket
12-2-15842-8 SEA,
Washington State, King County, Superior Court
(May 1, 2012)
Cite Docket
WASHINGTON STATE OF VS LG ELECTRONICS INC ET AL, 12-2-15842-8 SEA (Washington State, King County, Superior Court)
+ More Snippets
Docket
9:13-cv-80567,
Florida Southern District Court
(June 4, 2013)
Donald M. Middlebrooks,
presiding.
Patent
Cite Docket
Zenith Electronics LLC et al v. Craig Electronics, Inc., 9:13-cv-80567 (S.D.Fla.)
+ More Snippets
Docket
123-02049-CVKCD,
Washington State, King County, District Court
(Nov. 9, 2012)
Cite Docket
CREDIT INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION and JOHN R ELTRINGHAM vs. RAMIRO GONZALEZ, 123-02049-CVKCD (Washington State, King County, District Court)
+ More Snippets