• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
Displaying 1704-1718 of 737,512 results

Aftermarket Specialties 8-2-19 order

Document Panasonic Corporation of North America vs. Aftermarket Specialties, Inc.et al., 18EV006028, Proposed Order 1-Aftermarket_Specialties_8219_order (Ga. St., Fulton Co., St. Ct. Aug. 2, 2019)
IT APPEARING to this Court that the Defendant, Dallas L. Rohrer, was duly served with a copy ofthe Summons and Complaint effective February 19, 2O 1 9, and it further appearing that the time for filing defensive pleadings has passed and that no defensive pleadings have been filed by the Defendant, Dallas L. Rohrer, it is hereby found that no just reason exists for delaying issuance of a final judgment and this Court hereby ORDERS, that final judgment enter in favor of Plaintiff and against the Defendant, Dallas L. Rohrer, only, in the principal sum of $ 1 8 1 ,784.86, plus accrued interest in the amount of $92,710.
1 8 from September 6, 2016 through August 6, 201 9, plus reasonable attorney’s fees pursuant to O.C.G.A.
§ 7-4-12 at the legal rate from the date ofjudgment and all costs of this action.
JUDGE, State Court of Fulton County
Attorney for Plaintiff State Bar Number: 117806 SIMPSON, UCHITEL & WILSON, L.L.P. One Securities Centre, Suite 1100 3490 Piedmont Road, N.E.
cite Cite Document

Plaintiffs' Original Petition and Request for Disclosures

Document JOHNSON, FRENCHELL vs. DUTTON, JOSHUA, 202067310, No. 92710695 (Texas State, Harris County, 333rd District Court Oct. 20, 2020)
Defendant PANASONIC was the owner of the vehicle involved in the accident made the basis of this cause of action.
Plaintiffs would further show that Defendants’ conduct when viewed objectively from the standpoint of Defendants at the time of its occurrence involved an extreme degree of risk, considering the probability and magnitude of the potential harm
Further, Defendants had actual subjective awareness of the risks involved, but nevertheless preceded with conscious indifference to the rights, safety or welfare of others.
The emotional pain, torment and suffering (mental anguish) that Plaintiffs will, in reasonable probability, experience in the future,
Past and future loss of the enjoyment of life Plaintiffs would have enjoyed if not for their injuries; WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Plaintiffs request that the Defendants be cited to appear and answer herein, the Plaintiffs have judgment against Defendants, jointly and severally, for all actual damages, exemplary damages, pre- judgment interest from the date of the accident made the basis of this suit until the date of judgment, post-judgment interest at the applicable legal rate from the date of judgment forward until paid, costs of court, and any other relief, special or general, at law or in equity, to which Plaintiff may show herself justly entitled.
cite Cite Document

WHISPERFRESH

Docket 90348887, Trademark (Nov. 30, 2020)
ClassVentilating exhaust fans; Ventilating fans for household use; 013; 021; 023; 024; 031; 034
MarksWHISPERFRESH
Original Registrant Panasonic Corporation of North America
cite Cite Docket

KCN Services, LLC v. LG Chem, Ltd. et al

Docket 4:13-cv-02288, California Northern District Court (May 20, 2013)
Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, presiding
Anti-Trust
DivisionOakland
Cause15:1 Antitrust Litigation
Case Type410 Anti-Trust
Tags410 Anti-Trust, 410 Anti-Trust
Defendant Panasonic Corporation
Defendant Panasonic Corporation of North America
...
cite Cite Docket

ABBINANTI, SAM VS. PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH

Docket 12W00174, California State, Los Angeles County, Superior Court (Jan. 25, 2012)
DivisionVan Nuys Courthouse East
Case TypeSmall Claims (Limited Jurisdiction)
TagsSmall Claim, Civil, Limited Jurisdiction
Defendant PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA
...
cite Cite Docket

UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION AS SUBROGEE OF MARK GRA...

Docket 12-0477-CV, Texas State, Guadalupe County, 25th District Court (Feb. 29, 2012)
William Old, presiding
Case TypeDamage - Other than Motor Vehicle
TagsDamage, Other, Than Vehicle
Defendant PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA
...
cite Cite Docket

San Francisco Community College District v. LG Chem, Ltd. et al

Docket 4:13-cv-01384, California Northern District Court (Mar. 28, 2013)
Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, presiding
Anti-Trust
DivisionOakland
Cause15:15 Antitrust Litigation
Case Type410 Anti-Trust
Tags410 Anti-Trust, 410 Anti-Trust
Defendant Panasonic Corporation
Defendant Panasonic Corporation of North America
...
cite Cite Docket

Bryant v. LG Chem, LTD et al

Docket 4:13-cv-00928, California Northern District Court (Feb. 28, 2013)
Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, presiding
Anti-Trust
DivisionOakland
FlagsADRMOP, CLOSED, RELATE
Cause15:1 Antitrust Litigation
Case Type410 Anti-Trust
Tags410 Anti-Trust, 410 Anti-Trust
Defendant Panasonic Corporation
Defendant Panasonic Corporation of North America
...
cite Cite Docket

Order Filed Re: - Order Filed Re:

Document Neil Alan Miller and Zenaida G. Miller -v- Florentina Roman et al, CIVSB2128144, No. 11-29-21-order_regarding_a_request_for_further_action (California State, San Bernardino County, Superio...
Judge Nguyen Dept.
828 11/12/2021 Date: CASE: CIVSB2128144 Miller-V-Santa Marbella Florentina Roman Emily Lerner was appointed as the Guardian Ad Litem (GAL) for Begiamin Miller on 4/1 5/2021 'n robate case CONPSl900389.
Clerk’s officfild not receive a new order to appoint Emify as tEe GAL in this civil case.
Case caption already reflects as, “Emily Lerner as Guardian Ad Litem to Benj amin Miller”.
Does the court wish to allow Emily Lerner as the GAL to Benj amin Miller without submitting a new application and order and add her as a party to Civil Case CIVSB2128144?
cite Cite Document

WHISPERWARM DC

Docket 90162341, Trademark (Sept. 6, 2020)
ClassBathroom heaters; Ventilating exhaust fans; Ventilating fans for household use; 013; 021; 023; 024; 031; 034
MarksWHISPERWARM DC
Original Registrant Panasonic Corporation of North America
cite Cite Docket

Straight Path IP Group, Inc. v. VIZIO, Inc. et al

Docket 1:13-cv-00934, Virginia Eastern District Court (Aug. 1, 2013)
Anthony J Trenga, presiding, Ivan D. Davis
Patent
DivisionAlexandria
DemandPlaintiff
Cause35:271 Patent Infringement
Case Type830 Patent
Tags830 Patent, 830 Patent
Consolidated Defendant Panasonic Corporation of North America
Consolidated Defendant Panasonic Corporation
...
cite Cite Docket

No. 02-18-2021-1797544548-Certificate_of_Mailing_for_

Document MCKINLEY WILLIAMS VS MARIO RODRIGUEZ, ET AL., 20STCV46087, Certificate of Mailing for (Los Angeles Sup. Ct Feb. 18, 2021)
Stanley Mosk Courthouse 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
I, the below-named Executive Officer/Clerk of the above-entitled court, do hereby certify that I am not a party to the cause herein, and that on this date I served the Minute Order (Court Order re: Joint Stipulation to Transfer Venue from the ...) of 02/18/2021 upon each party or counsel named below by placing the document for collection and mailing so as to cause it to be deposited in the United States mail at the courthouse in Los Angeles, California, one copy of the original filed/entered herein in a separate sealed envelope to each address as shown below with the postage thereon fully prepaid, in accordance with standard court practices.
Danielle Hultenius Moore Fisher & Phillips LLP 4747 Executive Dr Ste 1000 Ste 1000 San Diego, CA 92121 Dated: 02/18/2021 Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer / Clerk of Court By: K. Lappin Deputy Clerk
cite Cite Document

3 Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition: Notice of Accord Filing Date

Document IPR2021-01029, No. 3 Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition - Notice of Accord Filing Date (P.T.A.B. Jun. 16, 2021)
For more information, please consult the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756 (Aug. 14, 2012), which is available on the Board Web site at http://www.uspto.gov/PTAB.
Patent Owner is advised of the requirement to submit mandatory notice information under 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(a)(2) within 21 days of service of the petition.
The parties are advised that under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), recognition of counsel pro hac vice requires a showing of good cause.
Box 1135 Chicago IL 60690 and Eric J. Klein VINSON & ELKINS L.L.P. 2 001 Ross Avenue Suite 3900 Dallas, TX 75201 Case IPR2021-01029 Patent No. 9,310,654
If the parties actually engage in alternative dispute resolution, the Case IPR2021-01029 Patent No. 9,310,654 PTAB would be interested to learn what mechanism (e.g., arbitration, mediation, etc.) was used and the general result.
cite Cite Document

DEVICE AND VEHICLE PAIRING USING A NETWORK CONNECTION

Docket 17/139,737, U.S. Patent Application (Dec. 31, 2020)
Art Group2478
Case TypeUtility - 370/310000
Class370
Patent11546954
Assignee PANASONIC AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS COMPANY OF AMERICA, DIVISION OF PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA
...
cite Cite Docket

DECISION + ORDER ON MOTION

Document DANILO RODRIGUEZ v. PANASONIC CORP. OF N. AMERICA et al, 21845/2019E, 12 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Bronx County May. 10, 2019)
Justice Supreme Court Read on this motion, (Seq.
No. 1) for The following papers numbered Ito DEFAULT JUDGMENT, noticed on April 26 2019.
Notice of Motion - Order to Show Cause - Exhibits and Affidavits Annexed Answering Affidavit and Exhibits Replying Affidavit and Exhibits No(s).
Upon the foregoing papers, it is ordered that this motion is etaalti 414 Ws as 66A414/5 cwAni Lai
cite Cite Document
<< 1 2 3 4 5 ... 114 115 116 117 118 ... >>