Document
IPR2021-01061, No. 16 Order Other - SCHEDULING ORDER (P.T.A.B. Jan. 12, 2022)
For example, reasonable expenses and attorneys’ fees incurred by any party may be levied on a person who impedes, delays, or frustrates the fair examination of a witness.
To satisfy this requirement, Patent Owner should request a conference call with the Board no later than two weeks prior to DUE DATE 1.
The Board defines a LEAP practitioner as a patent agent or attorney having three (3) or fewer substantive oral arguments in any federal tribunal, including PTAB.
All practitioners are expected to have a command of the factual record, the applicable law, and Board procedures, as well as the authority to commit the party they represent.
In stipulating to move any due dates in the scheduling order, the parties must be cognizant that the Board requires four weeks after the filing of an opposition to the motion to amend (or the due date for the opposition, if none is filed) for the Board to issue its preliminary guidance, if requested by Patent Owner.
Cite Document
IPR2021-01061, No. 16 Order Other - SCHEDULING ORDER (P.T.A.B. Jan. 12, 2022)
+ More Snippets
Document
In re Panasonic Corporation, 88976143, No. 4 (T.T.A.B. Jun. 9, 2020)
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board P.O.
Mailed: June 9, 2020 In re Panasonic Corporation Serial No. 88976143 Filed: 1/29/2019 By the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board: Applicant filed its notice of appeal with the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board on March 27, 2020.
It has come to the Board’s attention that this application has been approved for publication on April 21, 2020, thereby resolving the issues on appeal.
In view thereof, the appeal is dismissed as moot.
Cite Document
In re Panasonic Corporation, 88976143, No. 4 (T.T.A.B. Jun. 9, 2020)
+ More Snippets
Document
JOHN D. FERNANDEZ, ET AL. VS GENERAL ELECTRIC CO., ET AL., 21STCV30158, Notice of Posting of Jury (Los Angeles Sup. Ct Oct. 1, 2021)
Cite Document
JOHN D. FERNANDEZ, ET AL. VS GENERAL ELECTRIC CO., ET AL., 21STCV30158, Notice of Posting of Jury (Los Angeles Sup. Ct Oct. 1, 2021)
+ More Snippets
Docket
9:13-cv-80567,
Florida Southern District Court
(June 4, 2013)
Donald M. Middlebrooks,
presiding.
Patent
Cite Docket
Zenith Electronics LLC et al v. Craig Electronics, Inc., 9:13-cv-80567 (S.D.Fla.)
+ More Snippets
Docket
90235849,
Trademark
(Oct. 5, 2020)
Cite Docket
SPORTS CHANGE MAKERS, 90235849 (Trademark)
+ More Snippets
Docket
90687616,
Trademark
(May 3, 2021)
Cite Docket
WHISPERLINE, 90687616 (Trademark)
+ More Snippets
Document
Neil Alan Miller and Zenaida G. Miller -v- Florentina Roman et al, CIVSB2128144, No. 05-31-22-Summons_Issued_and_Filed (California State, San Bernardino County, Superior Court May. 31, 2...
Cite Document
Neil Alan Miller and Zenaida G. Miller -v- Florentina Roman et al, CIVSB2128144, No. 05-31-22-Summons_Issued_and_Filed (California State, San Bernardino County, Superior Court May. 31, 2022)
+ More Snippets
Document
In re Panasonic Avionics Corporation, 88352905, No. 2 (T.T.A.B. Jun. 1, 2020)
Cite Document
In re Panasonic Avionics Corporation, 88352905, No. 2 (T.T.A.B. Jun. 1, 2020)
+ More Snippets
Document
Kelly M. Kope, Relator, vs. Panasonic Avionics Corp, Respondent, Department of Employment and Economic Development, Respondent., A21-0760, 1158268 (Minn. Ct. App. Jul. 9, 2021)
Cite Document
Kelly M. Kope, Relator, vs. Panasonic Avionics Corp, Respondent, Department of Employment and Economic Development, Respondent., A21-0760, 1158268 (Minn. Ct. App. Jul. 9, 2021)
+ More Snippets
Docket
12SG1125-12,
California State, Los Angeles County, Superior Court
(May 16, 2012)
Cite Docket
AGEMIAN, ANAHID VS PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH, 12SG1125-12 (California State, Los Angeles County, Superior Court)
+ More Snippets
Docket
1:13-cv-00917,
Delaware District Court
(May 22, 2013)
Judge Leonard P. Stark,
presiding.
Patent
Cite Docket
One-Blue LLC et al v. Imation Corporation, 1:13-cv-00917 (D.Del.)
+ More Snippets
Docket
123-02049-CVKCD,
Washington State, King County, District Court
(Nov. 9, 2012)
Cite Docket
CREDIT INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION and JOHN R ELTRINGHAM vs. RAMIRO GONZALEZ, 123-02049-CVKCD (Washington State, King County, District Court)
+ More Snippets
Docket
2:13-cv-01012,
Texas Eastern District Court
(Nov. 26, 2013)
Rodney Gilstrap,
presiding.
Patent
Cite Docket
Long Corner Consumer Electronics LLC v. Panasonic Corporation of North America, 2:13-cv-01012 (E.D.Tex.)
+ More Snippets
Document
DANILO RODRIGUEZ v. PANASONIC CORP. OF N. AMERICA et al, 21845/2019E, 11 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Bronx County Apr. 26, 2019)
Cite Document
DANILO RODRIGUEZ v. PANASONIC CORP. OF N. AMERICA et al, 21845/2019E, 11 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Bronx County Apr. 26, 2019)
+ More Snippets
Document
Kelly M. Kope, Relator, vs. Panasonic Avionics Corp, Respondent, Department of Employment and Economic Development, Respondent., A21-0760, 1155859 (Minn. Ct. App. Jun. 21, 2021)
Cite Document
Kelly M. Kope, Relator, vs. Panasonic Avionics Corp, Respondent, Department of Employment and Economic Development, Respondent., A21-0760, 1155859 (Minn. Ct. App. Jun. 21, 2021)
+ More Snippets