• All Courts
  • Federal Courts
  • Bankruptcies
  • PTAB
  • ITC
Track Search
Export
Download All
47 results

NOISE REDUCTION DEVICE

Docket 16/142,348, U.S. Patent Application (Sept. 26, 2018)
Art Group2654
Case TypeUtility - 381/071400
Class381
Junji ARAKI
Kenichi KUBOTA
Applicant Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Lt
...
cite Cite Docket

1-10-US-161423480HP1

Document NOISE REDUCTION DEVICE, 16/142,348, No. 1-10-US-161423480HP1 (U.S. Pat. App. May. 23, 2019)

cite Cite Document

1-7-US-1614234809P1

Document NOISE REDUCTION DEVICE, 16/142,348, No. 1-7-US-1614234809P1 (U.S. Pat. App. Jan. 28, 2019)

cite Cite Document

Applicant Arguments/Remarks Made in an Amendment

Document NOISE REDUCTION DEVICE, 16/142,348, No. 4-5-US-161423480EP1 (U.S. Pat. App. Apr. 23, 2019)
Claim 1 recites that “a numberof the plurality of noise detectors that are disposed closer than a distance d from the center of control is less than a numberofthe plurality of noise detectors that are disposed farther than the distance d from the center of control, when the distance d is expressed asd = d0+t x v-A/2.” Applicant respectfully submits that Kano doesnot teach, or even suggest, the above- noted combination of features recited in claim 1.
Regarding the rejection of claim 3, the Examinerrefers to paragraph [0027] of Kano “[i]n this case, it is preferred that a relationship a < c/2f is realized when the distance from the adjacent noise detector is a, a sound velocity is c, and the upper-limit frequency of the control bandis f.” Given that c is sound velocity and fis frequency, a < c/2f can be rewritten as a < 4/2 (Equation (I)).
Forat least these reasons,it is evident that Kano does not teach, or even suggest, the features of independentclaim 1 or 3 of the present application.
Conclusion In view of the above, reconsideration and allowance of this application are now believed to be in order, and such actions are herebysolicited.
If any points remain in issue, the Examiner is kindly requested to contact the undersigned at the telephone numberlisted below.
cite Cite Document

1-1-US-161423480EP1

Document NOISE REDUCTION DEVICE, 16/142,348, No. 1-1-US-161423480EP1 (U.S. Pat. App. Apr. 23, 2019)

cite Cite Document

Abandonment

Document NOISE REDUCTION DEVICE, 16/142,348, No. 1-2-US-161423480JP1 (U.S. Pat. App. Dec. 26, 2019)
Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above—indicated "Notification Date" to the following e—mail address(es): eoa @ wenderoth.
lVoI/ce ofAba/m’onmenl 16/142,348 Examiner ARAKI et al. Art Unit -- The MAILING DA TE of this communication appears on the cover sheet wit/7 the correspondence address--
[:1 Applicant's failure to timely file corrected drawings as required by, and within the three-month period set in, the Notice of Allowability (PTO-37).
D The letter of express abandonment which is signed by the attorney or agent of record or other party authorized under 37 CFR 1.33 (b).
C] The letter of express abandonment which is signed by an attorney or agent (acting in a representative capacity under 37 CFR 1.34) upon the filing of a continuing application.
cite Cite Document

Bibliographic Data Sheet

Document NOISE REDUCTION DEVICE, 16/142,348, No. 14-1-US-1614234809P1 (U.S. Pat. App. Jan. 28, 2019)
Bibliographic Data 16/1 42,348 Application No: Foreign Priority claimed: O Yes 35 USC 119 (a-d) conditions met: CL Yes Verified and Acknowledged: @©No No Title: CL Met After Allowance [ Examiner's Signature Initials
This application is a CON of PCT/JP2017/012238 03/27/2017
Suite 400 East Washington, DC 20005-1503
cite Cite Document

1-2-US-1614234802P1

Document NOISE REDUCTION DEVICE, 16/142,348, No. 1-2-US-1614234802P1 (U.S. Pat. App. Sep. 26, 2018)

cite Cite Document
1 2 3 4 >>