throbber
To:
`
`Subject:
`
`Panasonic Corporation of North America (ptodocket@arelaw.com)
`
`TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 77046906 - WHISPERGREEN -
`55210/570
`
`Sent:
`
`3/21/2007 11:48:22 AM
`
`Sent As:
`
`ECOM116@USPTO.GOV
`
`Attachments: Attachment - 1
`Attachment - 2
`Attachment - 3
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`(cid:160) (cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160) SERIAL NO:(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`(cid:160) (cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160) APPLICANT:(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`77/046906
`
`Panasonic Corporation of North America
`
`*77046906*
`
`RETURN ADDRESS:(cid:160)
`Commissioner for Trademarks
`P.O. Box 1451
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160) CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:
`(cid:160) MORTON AMSTER
`(cid:160) AMSTER ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN LLP
`(cid:160) 90 PARK AVE
`(cid:160) NEW YORK, NY 10016-1301
`(cid:160)
`
`(cid:160) (cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160) MARK:(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160) WHISPERGREEN
`(cid:160) (cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160) CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO :(cid:160)(cid:160) 55210/570
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160) CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS:(cid:160)(cid:160) ptodocket@arelaw.com
`
`Please provide in all correspondence:
`
`(cid:160)1
`
`.(cid:160) Filing date, serial number, mark and
`applicant's name.
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`2.(cid:160) Date of this Office Action.
`3.(cid:160) Examining Attorney's name and
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160) Law Office number.
`4. Your
`telephone number and e-mail
`address.
`
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`OFFICE ACTION
`
`(cid:160)R
`
`ESPONSE TIME LIMIT:(cid:160) TO AVOID ABANDONMENT, THE OFFICE MUST RECEIVE A
`PROPER RESPONSE TO THIS OFFICE ACTION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE MAILING OR E-
`
`MAILING DATE.(cid:160)(cid:160)
`MAILING/E-MAILING DATE INFORMATION:(cid:160) If the mailing or e-mailing date of this Office
`action does not appear above, this information can be obtained by visiting the USPTO website at
`http://tarr.uspto.gov/, inserting the application serial number, and viewing the prosecution history for the
`mailing date of the most recently issued Office communication.
`
`(cid:160)
`

`
`Serial Number(cid:160) 77/046906
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`he assigned examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application and determined the
`following.
`
`(cid:160)L
`
`IKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`he examining attorney refuses registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. Section
`1052(d), because the applicant's mark, when used on the identified goods, is likely to be confused with
`the registered mark in U.S. Registration No. 0751288.(cid:160) TMEP section 1207.(cid:160) See the enclosed
`registration.
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`he examining attorney must analyze each case in two steps to determine whether there is a likelihood
`of confusion.(cid:160) First, the examining attorney must look at the marks themselves for similarities in
`appearance, sound, connotation and commercial impression.(cid:160) In re E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co.,
`476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973).(cid:160) Similarity in any one of these elements is sufficient to
`find a likelihood of confusion.(cid:160) In re Mack, 197 USPQ 755 (TTAB 1977).(cid:160) Second, the examining
`attorney must compare the goods or services to determine if they are related or if the activities
`surrounding their marketing are such that confusion as to origin is likely.(cid:160) In re August Storck KG, 218
`USPQ 823 (TTAB 1983); In re International Telephone and Telegraph Corp., 197 USPQ 910 (TTAB
`1978); Guardian Products Co., v. Scott Paper Co., 200 USPQ 738 (TTAB 1978).
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`he test of likelihood of confusion is not whether the marks can be distinguished when subjected to a
`side‑by‑side comparison.(cid:160) The issue is whether the marks create the same overall impression. Visual
`Information Institute, Inc. v. Vicon Industries Inc., 209 USPQ 179 (TTAB 1980).(cid:160) The focus is on the
`recollection of the average purchaser who normally retains a general rather than specific impression of
`trademarks.(cid:160) Chemetron Corp. v. Morris Coupling & Clamp Co., 203 USPQ 537 (TTAB 1979);
`Sealed Air Corp. v. Scott Paper Co., 190 USPQ 106 (TTAB 1975); TMEP section 1207.01(b).
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`he examining attorney must look at the marks in their entireties under Section 2(d).(cid:160) Nevertheless,
`one feature of a mark may be recognized as more significant in creating a commercial impression.(cid:160)
`Greater weight is given to that dominant feature in determining whether there is a likelihood of
`confusion.(cid:160) In re National Data Corp., 224 USPQ 749 (Fed. Cir. 1985);(cid:160) Tektronix, Inc. v. Daktronics,
`Inc., 534 F.2d 915, 189 USPQ 693 (CCPA 1976). In re J.M. Originals Inc., 6 USPQ2d 1393 (TTAB
`1988).
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`he applicant’s mark in this case is WHISPERGREEN, and the registrant’s mark in U.S. Registration
`No. 0751288 is WHISPER.(cid:160) The marks are similar in appearance, sound, connotation and overall
`common commercial impression in that they each contain the wording “whisper”. (cid:160) Both marks connote
`that the relevant goods are quiet as a “whisper”. (cid:160) Furthermore, the additional wording in the applicant’s
`mark is merely descriptive of a feature of the goods, namely, the goods are intended to be “[b]eneficial to
`the environment.” (cid:160) The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language: Fourth Edition.(cid:160) A
`copy of the definition is attached.(cid:160) Descriptive matter is typically less significant or less dominant when
`comparing marks.(cid:160) Although a descriptive portion of a mark certainly cannot be ignored, and the marks
`must be compared in their entireties, one feature of a mark may be more significant in creating a
`commercial impression.(cid:160) In re Dixie Restaurants Inc., 105 F.3d 1405, 41 USPQ2d 1531 (Fed. Cir. 1997);
`In re National Data Corporation, 753 F.2d 1056, 224 USPQ 749 (Fed. Cir. 1985); and In re Appetito
`Provisions Co. Inc., 3 USPQ2d 1553 (TTAB 1987).(cid:160) See also Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Packard Press Inc.,
`281 F.3d 1261, 62 USPQ 2d 1001 (Fed. Cir. 2002); Tektronix, Inc. v. Daktronics, Inc., 534 F.2d 915, 189
`
`

`
`USPQ 693 (C.C.P.A. 1976); In re El Torito Rests. Inc., 9 USPQ2d 2002 (TTAB 1988); In re Equitable
`Bancorporation, 229 USPQ 709 (TTAB 1986).
`
`(cid:160)I
`
`f the marks of the respective parties are identical or highly similar, the examining attorney must
`consider the commercial relationship between the goods or services of the respective parties carefully
`to determine whether there is a likelihood of confusion.(cid:160) In re Concordia International Forwarding
`Corp., 222 USPQ 355 (TTAB 1983).
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`he goods of the parties need not be identical or directly competitive to find a likelihood of confusion.(cid:160)
`They need only be related in some manner, or the conditions surrounding their marketing be such, that
`they could be encountered by the same purchasers under circumstances that could give rise to the
`mistaken belief that the goods come from a common source.(cid:160) In re Martin's Famous Pastry Shoppe,
`Inc., 748 F.2d 1565, 223 USPQ 1289 (Fed. Cir. 1984); In re Corning Glass Works, 229 USPQ 65
`(TTAB 1985); In re Rexel Inc., 223 USPQ 830 (TTAB 1984); Guardian Products Co., Inc. v. Scott
`Paper Co., 200 USPQ 738 (TTAB 1978); In re International Telephone & Telegraph Corp., 197
`USPQ 910 (TTAB 1978).
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`he applicant is using its mark on “ventilating fans.” (cid:160) The registrant is using its mark on “electrical
`ventilating fans.” (cid:160) The goods are related in that they are ventilating fans.(cid:160) Given the strong similarity of
`the marks and the relatedness of the parties’ goods, the examining attorney finds that there is a
`substantial likelihood that the same purchasers could mistakenly believe that the goods come from a
`common source.
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`he examining attorney must resolve any doubt regarding a likelihood of confusion in favor of the
`prior registrant.(cid:160) In re Hyper Shoppes (Ohio), Inc., 837 F.2d 463, 6 USPQ2d 1025 (Fed. Cir., 1988).
`
`(cid:160)A
`
`lthough the examining attorney has refused registration, the applicant may respond to the refusal to
`register by submitting evidence and arguments in support of registration.
`
`(cid:160)I
`
`f the applicant chooses to respond to the refusal to register, the applicant must also respond to the
`following requirement.
`
`(cid:160)A
`
`MENDED IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS REQUIRED
`
`(cid:160)A
`
`pplicant must clarify the identification of goods by indicating that the ventilating fans are for exhaust
`purposes.(cid:160) TMEP §1402.01.
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`he applicant may adopt the following amended identification of goods, if accurate:
`
`(cid:160)I
`
`nternational Class 11:(cid:160) Ventilating exhaust fans.
`
`(cid:160)F
`
`or assistance with identifying and classifying goods and/or services in trademark applications, please see
`the online searchable Manual of Acceptable Identifications of Goods and Services at
`http://tess2.uspto.gov/netahtml/tidm.html.
`
`(cid:160)P
`
`lease note that, while the identification of goods may be amended to clarify or limit the goods, adding to
`the goods or broadening the scope of the goods is not permitted.(cid:160) 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.(cid:160)
`Therefore, applicant may not amend the identification to include goods that are not within the scope of the
`goods set forth in the present identification.
`
`

`
`(cid:160)R
`
`ESPONSE
`
`(cid:160)A
`
`pplicant may respond to this Office action using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application System
`(TEAS) at <http://www.uspto.gov/teas/index.html>.(cid:160) When using TEAS the data the applicant submits
`is directly uploaded into the Office’s database, which reduces processing time and eliminates the
`possibility of data entry errors by the Office.(cid:160) Applicants are strongly encouraged to use TEAS to respond
`to Office actions.(cid:160) Applicants using TEAS should not submit a duplicate paper copy of the response.
`
`(cid:160)S
`
`TATUS OF APPLICATION
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`he Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) database on the USPTO website at
`http://tarr.uspto.gov provides detailed, up to the minute information about the status and prosecution
`history of trademark applications and registrations.(cid:160) The TARR database is available 24 hours a day, 7
`days a week.(cid:160) Status and status date information is also available via push-button telephone at (703)
`
`305‑8747 from 6:30 a.m. until midnight, Eastern Time, Monday through Friday.(cid:160)(cid:160)
`Tina L. Snapp
`
`(cid:160)/
`
`Tina L. Snapp/
`Examining Attorney
`Law Office 116
`(571) 272-9224
`Rightfax (571) 273-9116
`
`HOW TO RESPOND TO THIS OFFICE ACTION:
`ONLINE RESPONSE:(cid:160) You may respond using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application
`System (TEAS) Response to Office action form available on our website at
`http://www.uspto.gov/teas/index.html.(cid:160) If the Office action issued via e-mail, you must wait 72
`hours after receipt of the Office action to respond via TEAS.(cid:160) NOTE:(cid:160) Do not respond by e-mail.(cid:160)
`THE USPTO WILL NOT ACCEPT AN E-MAILED RESPONSE.
`REGULAR MAIL RESPONSE:(cid:160) To respond by regular mail, your response should be sent to the
`mailing return address above, and include the serial number, law office number, and examining
`attorney’s name. (cid:160) NOTE:(cid:160) The filing date of the response will be the date of receipt in the
`Office, not the postmarked date.(cid:160) To ensure your response is timely, use a certificate of mailing.(cid:160) 37
`C.F.R. §2.197.
`
`(cid:160)S
`
`TATUS OF APPLICATION: To check the status of your application, visit the Office’s Trademark
`Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) system at http://tarr.uspto.gov.
`
`(cid:160)V
`
`IEW APPLICATION DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Documents in the electronic file for pending
`applications can be viewed and downloaded online at http://portal.uspto.gov/external/portal/tow.
`
`(cid:160)G
`
`ENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION: For general information about trademarks, please visit
`the Office’s website at http://www.uspto.gov/main/trademarks.htm
`
`(cid:160)F
`
`OR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE
`ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY SPECIFIED ABOVE.
`
`(cid:160)
`(cid:160)
`

`
`Print: Mar 21, 200?
`
`72153821!
`
`TYPED DRAWING
`
`Serial Number
`12153820
`
`Status
`REGISTERED AND RENEWED
`
`Word Marl:
`WHISPER
`
`Standard Character Mark
`No
`
`Registration NI.II"I'IhBf
`0751288
`
`Date Registered
`l963fO6fl8
`
`Type of Mark
`TRADEMARK
`
`Register
`PRINCIPAL
`
`Mark Drawing Code
`[1] TYPED DRAWING
`
`D"NI1Bf
`INC. CORPORATION DELAWARE 8929 Terman Court San Diego
`COMAIR ROTRON,
`CALIFORNIA 92121
`
`Goodslse-wines
`Class Status —— ACTIVE.
`
`IC 011.
`
`US
`
`034.
`
`G & 3: Electrical
`
`Ventilating Fans. First Use:
`l962fO2f21.
`
`l9fi2HO2f2l. First Use In Commerce:
`
`Filing Date
`l962HO9H24
`
`Examining Attorney
`UNKNOWN
`
`A'i.'tOfl"IBy' Of R.Bt‘.'l'.'II"d
`JOHN F. WARD
`
`

`
`httpzffiiiniui-it. bartlohy. com.u’El I51 i"GD2551DD. html
`
`D3.F21i'2DDF" 1l:t1s'—1:’l3 All-'1
`
`
`
`_
`
`.
`
`-
`
`'
`
`-
`
`_
`
`
`
`
`Green William
`
`You proposed
`the new RFID
`
`infrastructure
`to track
`assets in
`real time
`
`CONTENTS - INDEX - ILLUSTRATIONS - BIBLIOGRAPHIC REDORD
`
`The American Heritage“ Dictionary ofthe English Language: Fourth Edition. 2000.
`
`_ _
`3‘ ‘"3"
`
` ' *1 gen
`NOUN3 1. The hue ofthat portion ofthe visible spectrum lying between yellow and
`glue, evoked in the human observer by radiant energy with wavelengths of
`approximately 490 to 570 nanometers; any ofa group of colors that may vary
`in lightness and saturation and whose hue is that ofthe emerald or somewhat
`ess yellow than that ofgrowing grass; one ofthe additive or light primaries;
`one ofthe psychological primary hues. 2. Something green in color. 3. groons
`Green growth or foliage, especially: a. The branches and leaves ofplants used
`for decoration. b. Leafy plants or pla.nt: parts eaten as vegetables. 4. A grassy
`.awn or plot, especially: a. A grassy area located usually at the center ofa city
`or town and set aside for common use; a common. 13. fioris A putting green.
`5. groons A green uniform: “a young. .
`. sergeant in dress grams” (Nelson
`Del-Jlille). 6. Slang Money. 7. Green A supporter ofa social and political
`movement that espouses global environmental protection, bioregionalism,
`social responsibility, and nonviolence.
`
`AD-TECTIVE3 __nflected forms: groon-or, groon-ost
`1. Ofthe color green. 2. Abounding in or covered with green growth or
`.l.".1I.... ‘L. _............i‘_ '5
`'hn1'..1.
`...I:.t. .......
`...t...E......a..t.t... .. _......
`
`an'iazonr:crn
`
`|______r M
`“Mg: ___
`IVc'TTl'|
`t1..-r
`}':I|Il
`
`.
`
`.
`No Maintenance
`Lawns
`Looks, Feels, 8. Plays
`Like Grass. Realistic.
`Synthetic Turf
`Solutions
`i-\.I.ru.ru.M'.-'Turf.con'i
`Grass & Lawn Care
`HEM
`l
`.
`’
`Groatfiooksflnlino Semh ctiDnan,,I 5} ‘
`_
`_
`_
`_
`_
`_
`_
`Neighborhood Lawn
`Home Sutiietts
`Iitles Authors
`Encyclopedia Dictionary
`Ihesaurus Quotations Englisrillsago
`Ca,,e-l-eamisreadyto
`help. Get a quote!
`Spring-Gre-en.cc-m
`Reference > American Horitagog > Dictionary
`Greeley Horace
`
`

`
`httpzffw-rum-\r.bartleh3r.comIl51r‘5’lr"GD2551DD.html
`
`D3.F21f2DDF"11:r1s'—1:’l3 AM
`
`foliage: she green woods. 3. Made with green or leafy vegetables: at green
`safari’. 4. Characterized by mild or temperate weather: a green cfiinaze. 5.
`Youthflfl; vigorous: ac: zne green age offd’. 6. Not mature or ripe; young:
`green fomaroes. 7. Branr.l—nevv', flesh. 3. Not yet fully processed, especially:
`a. Not aged: green wood. I). Not cured or tanned: green peffis. 9. Lacl-ring
`training or experience. See synonyms at young. 10a. Laclvrjng sophistication or
`worldly experience; r1a.ive. h. Easily duped or deceived; gullible. 11. Having a
`sickly 01 Lurlitzallliy puller uialiuulive ofriausea or jealousy, for e2<.a.uiplt:. 12:1.
`‘re er1*..r'
`
`"
`'
`en : green recyciingpoficies. IJ. Favoring or
`supporting environmentalism: green Iegisiczzors who szrengznenedpoflnzion
`conzrois.
`
`nu any Run an luau J':u.uu-r
`
`EH08"
`
`TRANS1T1VE& Inflected forms: greened, green-ing, greens
`INTRANSITIVE
`VERB: To make or become green.
`
`IDIOM3 green around (or about) the gills Pale or sickly in appearance.
`
`ETYMOLOGY3 Iviiddle English grene, from Old English gr§ne. See g}1_rE; in Appendix I. N,
`sense 7'
`, translation of German (die) Grzlnen, (the) Greens, fiom grz'.'rn, green.
`
`OTHER FORNIS:
`
`gre en'ly —nI>vER_e
`gl"E Bl'l'l'lB SS TNEIUN
`
`The Am.uicanHe1.11age® Dir.‘Li.Olt’iaI}'0lf‘l1’|£ Ek1gJJ511Lat1gUag\e,Faurr1iEd.it.iom. C0P}'11'§1T.® 2000b}-'Haugl*a.olnM.ifl2|.in Counpatry.Pub].ishedb3-'1}ne
`Hougl11.omM.i'flI|.in Cocnzipargr. Mlrights reserved.
`
`CONTENTS "INDEX ' ILLUSTRATIONS 'BIBLIC.|GR.APHIC RECORD
`
`( Greeley Horace
`
`
`Green William D
`
`Google l
`
`ml
`
`Click hereto shop the Eiarrlehy Bookstore.
`Welcome -Press - Ad\rerlising_- Linking_- Terms of Use -©2005 Elarllebycorn
`
`amazoncc-:1‘:
`
`HGIII.) 4. nu-runs
`
`_
`_
`.
`.
`Y
`.- «
`l 111- ‘M-HI I11 [.".ll('Ij_'__l‘.fl.' E}z}:1*ru-111 1'
`- Healtl-w:::eaIa.'a:1
`Bow Now
`I
`Tools. to +2I1r:r'L]iz:z your wnrl(ou'l
`
`,
`”'=-‘* ‘
`
`l "- ‘l""*"‘ “""-

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket