throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)
`
`OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION
`
`U.S. APPLICATION
`SERIAL NO.   79233156
`
`           
`
`MARK: CHANGING
`PHOTOGRAPHY
`LUMIX G
`
`*79233156*
`
`CORRESPONDENT
`ADDRESS:
`  
`       HGF LIMITED
`
`  
`
`       8th Floor,
`
`CLICK HERE TO RESPOND TO THIS
`LETTER:
`
`http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp
`
`         140 London Wall
`
`           London EC2Y 5DN
`
`    
`
`    UNITED KINGDOM
`
`   
`
`APPLICANT:
`PANASONIC
`CORPORATION
`
`    
`
`CORRESPONDENT’S
`REFERENCE/DOCKET
`
`NO:       
`
`  N/A
`
`   
`
`CORRESPONDENT
`
`E-MAIL ADDRESS:       
`
`OFFICE ACTION
`
`STRICT DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER
`
`INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION NO. 1404433
`
`STRICT DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THIS NOTIFICATION:  TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF THE REQUEST FOR
`EXTENSION OF PROTECTION OF THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE A COMPLETE RESPONSE
`TO THIS PROVISIONAL FULL REFUSAL NOTIFICATION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE “DATE ON WHICH THE NOTIFICATION
`WAS SENT TO WIPO (MAILING DATE)” LOCATED ON THE WIPO COVER LETTER ACCOMPANYING THIS NOTIFICATION.
`
`In addition to the Mailing Date appearing on the WIPO cover letter, a holder (hereafter “applicant”) may confirm this Mailing Date using the
`USPTO’s Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.uspto.gov/.  To do so, enter the U.S. application serial
`number for this application and then select “Documents.”   The Mailing Date used to calculate the response deadline for this provisional full
`refusal is the “Create/Mail Date” of the “IB-1rst Refusal Note.”
`
`This is a PROVISIONAL FULL REFUSAL of the request for extension of protection of the mark in the above-referenced U.S. application. 
`See 15 U.S.C. §1141h(c).  See below in this notification (hereafter “Office action”) for details regarding the provisional full refusal.
`










`

`

`INTRODUCTION
`
`The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney.   Applicant must respond timely and completely to
`the issue(s) below.  15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
`
`TRADEMARK ACT SECTION 2(d) REFUSAL – LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION
`
`Registration of the applied-for mark is refused because of a likelihood of confusion with the mark in U.S. Registration No. 2675599.  Trademark
`Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); see TMEP §§1207.01 et seq.  See the attached registration.
`
`Applicant’s mark is “CHANGING PHOTOGRAPHY LUMIX G” for “Photographic apparatus; photographic printing apparatus;
`photographic equipment; photographic instruments; stands for photographic apparatus; cameras; digital cameras; digital still cameras; compact
`digital cameras;  Photographs; apparatus for mounting photographs; photograph stands; paper for printing photographs; printing paper; digital
`printing paper; Photographic film development; printing; photographic printing; lithographic printing; framing of works of art; processing of
`photographic and cinematographic films; photographic image processing; rental of photographic printing apparatus; providing information
`relating to photographic printing services; Entertainment; cultural activities; videotaping; rental of video tapes; videotape production; video
`production; video editing; videotape editing; arranging of contests; arranging of cultural events; arranging of educational events; conducting of
`entertainment events; production of cinematographic films; rental of video cameras; rental of cameras; organisation of exhibitions for cultural
`and educational purposes; photography; photography services; photography instruction; photographic reporting; demonstration of photographic
`equipment [for training purposes]; training in the use of photographic equipment; education services relating to photographic printing; education
`services relating to photographic developing”.
`
`Registrant’s mark is “LUMIX” for “Digital still cameras”.
`
`ANALYSIS
`
`Trademark Act Section 2(d) bars registration of an applied-for mark that so resembles a registered mark that it is likely a consumer would be
`confused, mistaken, or deceived as to the source of the goods and/or services of the applicant and registrant(s).  See 15 U.S.C. §1052(d). 
`Determining likelihood of confusion is made on a case-by-case basis by applying the factors set forth in In re E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.,
`476 F.2d 1357, 1361, 177 USPQ 563, 567 (C.C.P.A. 1973).  In re i.am.symbolic, llc, 866 F.3d 1315, 1322, 123 USPQ2d 1744, 1747 (Fed. Cir.
`2017).  However, “[n]ot all of the [ du Pont] factors are relevant to every case, and only factors of significance to the particular mark need be
`considered.”   Coach Servs., Inc. v. Triumph Learning LLC, 668 F.3d 1356, 1366, 101 USPQ2d 1713, 1719 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (quoting In re
`Mighty Leaf Tea, 601. F.3d 1342, 1346, 94 USPQ2d 1257, 1259 (Fed. Cir 2010)).  The USPTO may focus its analysis “on dispositive factors,
`such as similarity of the marks and relatedness of the goods [and/or services].”   In re i.am.symbolic, llc, 866 F.3d at 1322, 123 USPQ2d at 1747
`
`(quoting Herbko Int’l, Inc. v. Kappa Books, Inc. , 308 F.3d 1156, 1164-65, 64 USPQ2d 1375, 1380 (Fed. Cir. 2002)); see TMEP §1207.01.  
`
`Similarity of the Marks
`
`Marks are compared in their entireties for similarities in appearance, sound, connotation, and commercial impression.  Stone Lion Capital
`Partners, LP v. Lion Capital LLP, 746 F.3d 1317, 1321, 110 USPQ2d 1157, 1160 (Fed. Cir. 2014) (quoting Palm Bay Imps., Inc. v. Veuve
`Clicquot Ponsardin Maison Fondee En 1772, 396 F.3d 1369, 1371, 73 USPQ2d 1689, 1691 (Fed. Cir. 2005)); TMEP §1207.01(b)-(b)(v). 
`“Similarity in any one of these elements may be sufficient to find the marks confusingly similar.”   In re Davia, 110 USPQ2d 1810, 1812 (TTAB
`2014) (citing In re 1st USA Realty Prof’ls, Inc. , 84 USPQ2d 1581, 1586 (TTAB 2007)); In re White Swan Ltd., 8 USPQ2d 1534, 1535 (TTAB
`1988)); TMEP §1207.01(b).
`
`The marks are similar because in applicant’s mark the term “LUMIX” appears to identify the source of the goods, whereas the wording
`“CHANGING PHOTOGRAPHY” appears to be a slogan and not an identifier of the source of the goods. For this reason, the word “LUMIX” is
`the dominant word in applicant’s mark. In registrant’s mark, the word “LUMIX” is the sole word in the mark, making it the dominant and only
`source-identifier.
`


`  








`

`

`Since the source identifiers in applicant’s and registrant’s marks are identical, the marks are similar.
`
`Similarity of the Goods and Services
`
`The goods and/or services are compared to determine whether they are similar, commercially related, or travel in the same trade channels.  See
`Coach Servs., Inc. v. Triumph Learning LLC, 668 F.3d 1356, 1369-71, 101 USPQ2d 1713, 1722-23 (Fed. Cir. 2012); Herbko Int’l, Inc. v.
`Kappa Books, Inc., 308 F.3d 1156, 1165, 64 USPQ2d 1375, 1381 (Fed. Cir. 2002); TMEP §§1207.01, 1207.01(a)(vi).
`
`The compared goods and/or services need not be identical or even competitive to find a likelihood of confusion.  See On-line Careline Inc. v.
`Am. Online Inc., 229 F.3d 1080, 1086, 56 USPQ2d 1471, 1475 (Fed. Cir. 2000); Recot, Inc. v. Becton, 214 F.3d 1322, 1329, 54 USPQ2d 1894,
`1898 (Fed. Cir. 2000); TMEP §1207.01(a)(i).  They need only be “related in some manner and/or if the circumstances surrounding their
`marketing are such that they could give rise to the mistaken belief that [the goods and/or services] emanate from the same source.”   Coach
`Servs., Inc. v. Triumph Learning LLC, 668 F.3d 1356, 1369, 101 USPQ2d 1713, 1722 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (quoting 7-Eleven Inc. v. Wechsler, 83
`USPQ2d 1715, 1724 (TTAB 2007)); TMEP §1207.01(a)(i).
`
`The goods are related because applicant and registrant each sell digital still cameras.
`
`Further, the attached Internet evidence, consisting of web pages from Fujifilm and Canon, establishes that the same entity commonly
`manufactures and provides the relevant goods and services and markets the goods and services under the same mark, and the goods and services
`are similar or complementary in terms of purpose or function.  Thus, applicant’s and registrant’s goods and/or services are considered related
`for likelihood of confusion purposes.  See, e.g., In re Davey Prods. Pty Ltd., 92 USPQ2d 1198, 1202-04 (TTAB 2009); In re Toshiba Med. Sys.
`Corp., 91 USPQ2d 1266, 1268-69, 1271-72 (TTAB 2009).
`
`Conclusion
`
`The overriding concern is not only to prevent buyer confusion as to the source of the goods and/or services, but to protect the registrant from
`adverse commercial impact due to use of a similar mark by a newcomer.  See In re Shell Oil Co., 992 F.2d 1204, 1208, 26 USPQ2d 1687, 1690
`(Fed. Cir. 1993).  Therefore, any doubt regarding a likelihood of confusion determination is resolved in favor of the registrant.  TMEP
`§1207.01(d)(i); see Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Packard Press, Inc., 281 F.3d 1261, 1265, 62 USPQ2d 1001, 1003 (Fed. Cir. 2002); In re Hyper
`Shoppes (Ohio), Inc., 837 F.2d 463, 464-65, 6 USPQ2d 1025, 1026 (Fed. Cir. 1988).
`
`For the foregoing reasons, registration is refused under Trademark Act Section 2(d).
`
`If applicant responds to the refusal above, then applicant must also address the requirements outlined below.
`
`MARK DESCRIPTION AND COLOR CLAIM REQUIRED
`
`Applicant has submitted a color drawing, but has not provided the required description specifying where color appears in the literal and design
`elements in the mark.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.37, 2.52(b)(1); TMEP §807.07(a)-(a)(ii).  Applications for marks not in standard characters must
`include an accurate and concise description of the entire mark that identifies literal elements as well as any design elements.  See 37 C.F.R.
`§2.37; TMEP §§808.01, 808.02, 808.03(b).  And for marks depicted in color, this description must specify where the color(s) appear(s) on the
`mark.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.52(b)(1); TMEP §807.07(a)(ii).
`
`Generic color names must be used to describe the colors in the mark, e.g., magenta, yellow, turquoise.  TMEP §807.07(a)(i)-(ii).   If black, white,
`and/or gray are not being claimed as a color feature of the mark, applicant must exclude them from the color claim and include in the mark
`description a statement that the colors black, white, and/or gray represent background, outlining, shading, and/or transparent areas and are not
`part of the mark.  See TMEP §807.07(d).
`








`  
`  



`

`

`Therefore, applicant must provide a mark description that specifies where all the colors appear in the literal and design elements in the mark.  See
`TMEP §807.07(a)(ii).  The following is suggested, if accurate:
`
`The mark consists of the wording “CHANGING PHOTOGRAPHY” in black capital letters inside a red plain single line
`rectangle with curved corners and an opening at the bottom center where the word “LUMIX” appears in black capital letters
`followed by a red capital letter “G”.
`
`Applicant has submitted a color drawing and provided a mark description referencing color, but has not provided the required color claim. 
`Applications for marks depicted in color must include a complete list of all the colors claimed as a feature of the mark.  37 C.F.R. §2.52(b)(1);
`
`see TMEP §§807.07(a) et seq.  
`
`If black, white and/or gray are not being claimed as a color feature of the mark, applicant must state that the colors black, white and/or gray
`represent background, outlining, shading and/or transparent areas and are not part of the mark.  TMEP §807.07(d).  Generic color names must be
`used to identify the colors in the mark, e.g., magenta, yellow, turquoise.  TMEP §807.07(a)(i)-(a)(ii).
`
`Therefore, applicant must provide the required color claim.  The following is suggested, if accurate:  “The colors red and black are claimed as
`a feature of the mark.”  TMEP §807.07(a)(i).
`
`ENTITY INFORMATION REQUIRED
`
`  Place Incorporated.”   Applicant must specify its entity type
`The application does not include applicant’s “Legal Nature” and “Legal Nature:
`(“Legal Nature”) and citizenship (“Place Incorporated”).
`  37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(3); TMEP §§803.03, 803.04.
`
`Acceptable entity types include an individual, a partnership, a corporation or a joint venture.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(3); TMEP §§803.03 et seq.  
`
`If applicant’s entity type is an individual, applicant must indicate his or her national citizenship for the record.   37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(3)(i); TMEP
`§803.04.  If applicant’s entity type is a corporation or association, applicant must set forth the country under whose laws applicant is organized
`or incorporated.  37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(3)(ii); TMEP §§803.03(c), 803.04.  If applicant’s entity type is a partnership or joint venture, applicant
`must specify the country under whose laws the partnership or joint venture is organized.  37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(3)(ii)-(iii); TMEP §§803.03(b),
`
`803.04.   
`
`AMENDMENT TO IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS AND SERVICES REQUIRED
`
`The identification of goods and services is indefinite and must be clarified in the manner outlined below.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP
`
`§1402.01.  
`
`The Trademark Act requires that a trademark or service mark application must include a “ specification of … the goods [or services]” in
`connection with which the mark is being used or will be used.  15 U.S.C. §1051(a)(2) (emphasis added), (b)(2) (emphasis added); see 15 U.S.C.
`§1053.  Specifically, a complete application must include a “list of the particular goods or services on or in connection with which the
`applicant uses or intends to use the mark.”   37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6) (emphasis added).  This requirement for a specification of the particular goods
`and/or services applies to applications filed under all statutory bases.  See 15 U.S.C. §§1051(a)(2), 1051(b)(2), 1053, 1126(d)-(e), 1141f; 37
`C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.01(b)-(c).
`
`The USPTO has the discretion to determine the degree of particularity needed to clearly identify goods and/or services covered by a mark.  In re
`Fiat Grp. Mktg. & Corp. Commc’ns S.p.A , 109 USPQ2d 1593, 1597 (TTAB 2014) (citing In re Omega SA, 494 F.3d 1362, 1365, 83 USPQ2d
`1541, 1543-44 (Fed. Cir. 2007)).  Accordingly, the USPTO requires the description of goods and/or services in a U.S. application to be specific,
`definite, clear, accurate, and concise.  TMEP §1402.01; see In re Fiat Grp. Mktg. & Corp. Commc’ns S.p.A , 109 USPQ2d at 1597-98; Cal.
`
`Spray-Chem. Corp. v. Osmose Wood Pres. Co. of Am., 102 USPQ 321, 322 (Comm’r Pats. 1954).   
`



`  




`

`

`In the present case, the following amendments are required:
`
`Class 9:
`
`The wording “Photographic apparatus; photographic printing apparatus; photographic equipment; photographic instruments” must be amended
`to specify the nature and purpose of the goods as they would appear in Class 9.
`
`For instance, if accurate, applicant may amend to: “Photographic apparatus, namely, slide transparencies, projectors, and photographic cameras;
`Photographic printing apparatus, namely, photo printers; Photographic equipment, namely, photocopiers, photographic filters, and photographic
`viewfinders; Photographic instruments, namely, [list the specific goods using their common commercial or generic name]”.
`
`Class 16: Accepted.
`
`Class 40:
`
`The wording “photographic image processing” cannot be accepted the description is broad enough to encompass digital imaging services in
`Class 41, electronic digitizing of photographs into a computer readable media in Class 42, etc. Therefore, applicant must clarify the nature and
`purpose of the services. If accurate, applicant may amend to: “Photographic image processing, namely, alteration and retouching of photographic
`images”.
`
`Class 41:
`
`The following wording must be amended to specify the exact nature and purpose of the services: “Entertainment; cultural activities”. If accurate,
`applicant may amend to: “Entertainment services in the nature of production of multimedia entertainment content, not for advertising or
`commercial purposes; Cultural activities in the nature of organizing cultural events”.
`
`The wording “arranging of educational events” must be amended to specify the subject matter and type of educational events, such as
`“Arranging of educational exhibitions in the field of yoga.”
`
`The wording “Conducting of entertainment events” must be amended to specify that the events are “social entertainment events”.
`
`The wording “demonstration of photographic equipment [for training purposes]” must be amended to delete the brackets and incorporate the
`bracketed wording into the description. If accurate, applicant may amend to: “Education services, namely, demonstration of photographic
`equipment for training purposes”.
`
`The wording “education services relating to photographic printing; education services relating to photographic developing” must be amended to
`specify the exact type of education service, such as “education services in the nature of conducting courses relating to photographic printing.”
`
`Applicant’s goods and/or services may be clarified or limited, but may not be expanded beyond those originally itemized in the application or as
`acceptably narrowed.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §§1402.06, 1904.02(c)(iv).  Applicant may clarify or limit the identification by inserting
`qualifying language or deleting items to result in a more specific identification; however, applicant may not substitute different goods and/or
`services or add goods and/or services not found or encompassed by those in the original application or as acceptably narrowed.  See TMEP
`§1402.06(a)-(b).  The scope of the goods and/or services sets the outer limit for any changes to the identification and is generally determined by
`the ordinary meaning of the wording in the identification.  TMEP §§1402.06(b), 1402.07(a)-(b).  Any acceptable changes to the goods and/or
`services will further limit scope, and once goods and/or services are deleted, they are not permitted to be reinserted.  TMEP §1402.07(e). 
`Additionally, for applications filed under Trademark Act Section 66(a), the scope of the identification for purposes of permissible amendments is
`limited by the international class assigned by the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization (International Bureau);
`and the classification of goods and/or services may not be changed from that assigned by the International Bureau.  37 C.F.R. §2.85(d); TMEP
`§§1401.03(d), 1904.02(b).  Further, in a multiple-class Section 66(a) application, classes may not be added or goods and/or services transferred
`from one existing class to another.  37 C.F.R. §2.85(d); TMEP §1401.03(d).
`













`

`

`For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S.
`Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual.  See TMEP §1402.04.
`
`RESPONSE GUIDELINES
`
`WHO IS PERMITTED TO RESPOND TO THIS PROVISIONAL FULL REFUSAL:  Any response to this provisional refusal must be
`personally signed by an individual applicant, all joint applicants, or someone with legal authority to bind a juristic applicant (e.g., a corporate
`officer or general partner).  37 C.F.R. §§2.62(b), 2.193(e)(2)(ii); TMEP §712.01.  If applicant hires a qualified U.S. attorney to respond on his or
`her behalf, then the attorney must sign the response.  37 C.F.R. §§2.193(e)(2)(i), 11.18(a); TMEP §§611.03(b), 712.01.  Qualified U.S. attorneys
`include those in good standing with a bar of the highest court of any U.S. state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and other U.S.
`commonwealths or U.S. territories.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.17(a), 2.62(b), 11.1, 11.14(a); TMEP §§602, 712.01.  Additionally, for all responses, the
`proper signatory must personally sign the document or personally enter his or her electronic signature on the electronic filing.  See 37 C.F.R.
`§2.193(a); TMEP §§611.01(b), 611.02.  The name of the signatory must also be printed or typed immediately below or adjacent to the signature,
`or identified elsewhere in the filing.  37 C.F.R. §2.193(d); TMEP §611.01(b).
`
`In general, foreign attorneys are not permitted to represent applicants before the USPTO (e.g., file written communications, authorize an
`amendment to an application, or submit legal arguments in response to a requirement or refusal).  See 37 C.F.R. §11.14(c), (e); TMEP §§602.03-
`
`.03(b), 608.01.  
`
`DESIGNATION OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE:  The USPTO encourages applicants who do not reside in the United States to
`designate a domestic representative upon whom any notice or process may be served.  TMEP §610; see 15 U.S.C. §§1051(e), 1141h(d); 37
`
`C.F.R. §2.24(a)(1)-(2).  Such designations may be filed online at http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.  
`
`Because of the legal technicalities and strict deadlines involved in the USPTO application process, applicant may wish to hire a qualified U.S.
`attorney specializing in trademark matters to represent applicant in this process and provide legal advice.  Although the undersigned trademark
`examining attorney is permitted to help an applicant understand the contents of an Office action as well as the application process in general, no
`USPTO attorney or staff is permitted to give an applicant legal advice or statements about an applicant’s legal rights.   TMEP §§705.02, 709.06. 
`For attorney referral information, applicant may consult the American Bar Association’s Consumers’ Guide to Legal Help or an online directory
`of legal professionals, such as FindLaw®.  The USPTO, however, may not assist an applicant in the selection of an attorney.  37 C.F.R. §2.11.
`
`Please note that foreign attorneys, other than authorized Canadian attorneys, are not permitted to represent applicants before the USPTO (e.g.,
`file written communications, authorize an amendment to an application, or submit legal arguments in response to a requirement or refusal).  See
`
`37 C.F.R. §§2.17(e), 11.14(c), (e); TMEP §602.03-.03(c).  
`
`For this application to proceed further, applicant must explicitly address each refusal and/or requirement raised in this Office action.  If the
`action includes a refusal, applicant may provide arguments and/or evidence as to why the refusal should be withdrawn and the mark should
`register.  Applicant may also have other options specified in this Office action for responding to a refusal, and should consider those options
`carefully.  To respond to requirements and certain refusal response options, applicant should set forth in writing the required changes or
`statements.  For more information and general tips on responding to USPTO Office actions, response options, and how to file a
`response online, see “ Responding to Office Actions” on the USPTO’s website.
`
`If applicant does not respond to this Office action within six months of the date on which the USPTO sends this Office action to the International
`Bureau, or responds by expressly abandoning the application, the application process will end and the trademark will fail to register.  See 15
`
`U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.65(a), 2.68(a); TMEP §§711, 718.01, 718.02.  
`
`When an application has abandoned for failure to respond to an Office action, an applicant may timely file a petition to revive the application,
`which, if granted, would allow the application to return to active status.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.66; TMEP §1714.  The petition must be filed within
`two months of the date of issuance of the notice of abandonment and may be filed online via the Trademark Electronic Application System
`(TEAS) with a $100 fee.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(15)(ii), 2.66(a)(1), (b)(1).
`
`If applicant has questions regarding this Office action, please telephone or e-mail the assigned trademark examining attorney.  All relevant e-
`mail communications will be placed in the official application record; however, an e-mail communication will not be accepted as a response to
`

`  





`

`

`this Office action and will not extend the deadline for filing a proper response.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05. 
`Further, although the trademark examining attorney may provide additional explanation pertaining to the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this
`Office action, the trademark examining attorney may not provide legal advice or statements about applicant’s rights.   See TMEP §§705.02,
`709.06.
`
`   
`
`/Shaila E. Lewis/
`
`Trademark Examining Attorney
`
`Law Office 114
`
`571-270-1527 (work)
`
`571-270-2527 (fax)
`
`shaila.lewis@uspto.gov
`
`TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER:   Go to http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp.   Please wait 48-72 hours from the
`issue/mailing date before using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), to allow for necessary system updates of the application. 
`For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov.  For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned
`trademark examining attorney.  E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to
`this Office action by e-mail.
`
`All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.
`
`WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE:  It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an
`applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants).  If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the
`
`response.  
`
`PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION:   To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official
`notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at
`http://tsdr.uspto.gov/.   Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen.   If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the
`Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199.   For more information on checking
`status, see http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/process/status/.
`
`TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS:  Use the TEAS form at http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.
`





`  
`

`

`Print: Jun 8, 2018
`
`76295388
`
`DESIGN MARK
`
`serial Number
`TEZBSBBB
`
`Status
`REGISTERED AND RENEWED
`
`Word Mark
`LUMIX
`
`Standard Character Mark
`No
`
`Registration Number
`2615599
`
`Date Registered
`2003x01x14
`
`Type of Mark
`TRADEMARK
`
`Register
`PRINCIPAL
`
`Mark Drawing Code
`[i] TYPED DRAWING
`
`Owner
`PANASONIC CORPORATION OE NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION DELAWARE ONE
`PANASONIC WAY SECAUCUS NEW JERSEY 0T094
`
`GoodsfServioes
`G S: 8:
`021 023 026 036 033.
`US
`IC 009.
`Class Status -- ACTIVE.
`DIGITAL STILL CAMERAS. First Use: ZOOZKOBKZI. First Use In Commerce:
`2002/03/21.
`
`Filing Date
`2001/08/06
`
`Examining Attorney
`ALI, STEPHANIE
`
`Attorneyr of Record
`Dennis HopkinsIr Alexander Garcia and Thomas Holt
`
`

`

`LUMIX
`
`

`

`nt‘tos //vwvw use canon com/rnternet/Dor‘tel/us/nome/exolore/solutronseservrces/busrnessservrces/
`06/08/2018 08 43 05 AM
`
`HFEEDBACK
`
`SEE llJPEISSlELE
`RRooucrs
`EXPLORE
`Canon
`scrunonss services
`Business services
`Exnlore
`
`Home
`
`SUPPORT
`
`ABOUT
`
`SHOP
`
`DRIVERS a DOWNLOADS
`
`PRODUCT REorsrRATION coroner
`
`
`
`SEAR]
`
`Canon Business Services
`Canon USA provrdes valuable services and preeseles consultancy to our channel partners and customers Canon will continue
`to provide servrces that will address specific business needs as well as help our customers adhere to and enforce their own
`Internal business objectives and policies
`All of which Will be delivered and supported In a manner our customers have come to
`expect from Canon U S A
`
`Canon Managed Document Services
`Canon MDS is a unified offering for total output and document solutions
`management. It consists of complete program customization within your desired
`time frame, specific to your unique business needs. From the printed page to the
`electronic document, Canon provides a portfolio of custom services to help you
`achieve your business goals for cost reduction, improved serviceaoility, support,
`and document accessibility.
`LEARN MORE
`
`
`
`
`
`w—emrsflum
`Grim Emil/o! fit/Jami Heynnd
`
`

`

`mos //vwvw use canon com/lnternet/ooi‘tal/usmome/exolore/solutlonsesemcos/businessrservmes/
`06/08/20l8 08 43 05 AM
`
`GLOBAL SERX'
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Complete Solutions For Global Organizations
`Canon's Global Services Division provides customers with a single access point
`tor global business. to ensure a smooth transition and implementation on both a
`global and local level. It is designed to enhance your business processes for
`global provision of superb services. operational consistency. innovative
`technology, and the delivery of continual improvement across your organization to
`support your business objectives. For enterprise business, Canon's Global
`Services Division provides a suite at services and comprehensive account
`management to design and deliver the best value solution to meet your current
`and tuture needs.
`
`
`
`

`

`httos //vwvw use canon com/lnternet/Dortel/us/home/exolore/solutlonseseerces/buslnessservmes/
`06/08/2018 08 43 05 AM
`
`Professional Services by Canon Information and
`Imaging S lutions, Inc. (CIIS)
`Bringing together Canon‘s information management expertise and imaging
`technologies. CIIS transforms organizations through digitization. leading
`technology and experience. Leveraging expertise in both digital imaging and
`business process automation the Clls team delivers market-driven services and
`solutions, to help optimize Vital business processes and integrate the right
`technologies. Offerings include:
`- Document Services / Print Services
`- Business Process Automation
`
`- Software Development
`
`Contact
`Company
`Reach Us
`About Canon U.SA., Inc.
`Pmducl Suppon
`News
`mam: Relations
`Careers
`l-l Fastback
`Sustainability
`Whme In Buy
`EPEAT
`Sign up for Emais
`Sile Map
`9 mix camn us A, In: An Rigms Reserved. Repmflndiml m whole or pan wmnm penuissmn is prnllibied.
`
`Legal
`Product Mvisnlies
`anacy Statement
`Tenn: of Use
`VPAT Search
`Safety Data Sheets (SDS) Search
`To Our customers
`
`Social
`
`@
`
`

`

`
`
`mos //vwvw Use canon com/Tmemet/DortaI/Usmome/DTOOUCIS/ 06/08/2018 08 45 54 AM
`
`HFEEDBACK
`
`3:: Tunusg‘m
`acallfl“ EXPLORE
`Home
`Fwduns
`
`PRODUCTS
`
`SUPPORT
`
`ABOUT
`
`SHOP
`
`DRIVERS a DOWNLOADS
`
`PRODUCT REGISIRATIDN CONTACT
`
`,5; a; : —
`
`- -
`SEAR]
`
`-
`
`' ~
`
`EPIC-200mm
`f/2.Bl. IS IN USM
`
`EF 70-200mm
`f/4L IS II USM
`
`I3 MONTHS OF
`
`FREE ACCIDENTAL DAMAGE
`
`A.
`
`'
`
`PROTECTION FROM CANON
`Purchase and register selecr products now through July 7'. 2018
`
`I
`
`BUILDING 0N
`
`TRADITION '
`
`THE EF 70-200mm
`
`LINE
`
`.
`
`.‘
`
`,.
`”I
`
`‘.
`
`,
`
`3
`
`I
`
`Check out the exciting promotions curremly
`running on Canon products!
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`nuns //vwvw use canon com/wmemet/DortaVusmome/Droducts/ 06/08/2018 08 45 54 AM
`
`THE OFFICIAL CANON ONLiNE
`
`Office Solutions
`
`(mum
`
`Production Priming
`
`Professional Imaging Equipment
`
`

`

`nt‘ips //vwvw Lisa canon com/imemet/Dortai/usmome/Droducis/
`
`06/08/2018 08 45 54 AM
`
`Health ca re Products
`
`industrial Freq
`
`Sensors
`
`Where to Buy
`Explore your upiluns on where in buy Canon pioduds.
`
`
`
`LEARN MORE
`
`
`
`
`Free Shipping Availabie
`
`Company
`Almul Canon U SA, Inc
`News
`Careers
`Susiainabiiiiy
`EPEAT
`Site Map
`a 2mg Cimn us A, Inr. All Rights Reserved, Remodudian in whole ur Dari
`
`Contact
`Reach Us
`Ploduc! Support
`Invesim Relafiors
`H Feedback
`Whale In Buy
`Sign up for Emmls
`immnul Dennisslnu i5 Dmhihiled
`
`Legal
`Produci Advisories
`Privacy Slatemenl
`Tenns of Use
`VPAT Search
`Safety Data Sheets (SDS) Search
`To Oul Gusmmers
`
`iii
`
`Social
`
`

`

`This IS Smole's cache at http'llwwwjuiifilmusa,corril'productslpersonaflzedJ)nneroductslpnnts_card5nndex,htmL It is a snapshot ot the page as it appeared on Jun 6‘ 201B fl9:26:18 GMT, The current page could have changed in the meantime, Learn
`more, Ev
`Wow source to
`Text-only version to
`Full version
`Tip: To quickly find your search term on this page, press (2th or l-F (Mac) and use tile find oar,
`
`
`FUJIFILM was . “a
`Value frurri liliovatlori
`
`Eng-m
`
`Bpar'iolt-u
`
`Silernap
`
`CortlaLtLls V," Gabalsileto
`
`Seamh
`
`Home
`
`Innovation
`
`
`Products
`
`Support & Contact
`
`About Fujifilm
`
`Press Center
`
`US Gateway
`
`Prints and Cards
`
`MLPersonalized Photo
`Products
`Wall Decor
`
` Drinkwale
`Albums
`Home or mice
`Blankms is Apparel
`Accessones
`Ornaments
`Integrate with Us
`
`
`
`Printed on quality Fujililm Crystal Archive paper, prints are available in a variety of sizes including panoramic,
`traditional and square tormat
`Our premium stationery cards are also available in 4x8 and 5x7 sizes, Cards are printed on tDO# stock paper
`and are sold with envelopes included,
`
`For more information on Personalized Photo Products Group Fulfillment, contact your Fuji'fil'm Sales
`Re
`semal‘ive or na '
`to to our product Iota
`ti clicki
`an tire Manual & Brochures link at
`' ht
`pm
`”93
`R log y
`"g
`”g
`
`Support 8.
`Downloads
`
`,

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket