throbber
To:
`
`Subject:
`
`Sent:
`
`Sent As:
`
`Attachments:
`
`Panasonic Corporation (docketingtm@hdp.com)
`
`U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 86508286 - PANASONIC SECURITY DNA - 9432-200571-
`
`3/3/2015 9:16:52 AM
`
`ECOM111@USPTO.GOV
`
`Attachment - 1
`Attachment - 2
`Attachment - 3
`Attachment - 4
`Attachment - 5
`Attachment - 6
`Attachment - 7
`Attachment - 8
`Attachment - 9
`Attachment - 10
`Attachment - 11
`Attachment - 12
`Attachment - 13
`Attachment - 14
`Attachment - 15
`Attachment - 16
`Attachment - 17
`Attachment - 18
`Attachment - 19
`Attachment - 20
`Attachment - 21
`Attachment - 22
`Attachment - 23
`Attachment - 24
`Attachment - 25
`Attachment - 26
`Attachment - 27
`Attachment - 28
`Attachment - 29
`Attachment - 30
`Attachment - 31
`Attachment - 32
`Attachment - 33
`Attachment - 34
`Attachment - 35
`Attachment - 36
`Attachment - 37
`Attachment - 38
`Attachment - 39
`Attachment - 40
`Attachment - 41
`Attachment - 42
`Attachment - 43
`Attachment - 44
`
`

`

`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)
`OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION
`
`*86508286*
`
`CLICK HERE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER:
`http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp
`
`VIEW YOUR APPLICATION FILE
`
`U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. (cid:160) 86508286
`
`(cid:160)M
`
`ARK: PANASONIC SECURITY DNA
`
`CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:
`(cid:160)(cid:160)
`(cid:160)(cid:160) (cid:160) (cid:160) GEOFFREY D. AURINI
`(cid:160)(cid:160)
`(cid:160)(cid:160) (cid:160) (cid:160) HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, P.L.C.
`(cid:160) (cid:160) (cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160) 5445 CORPORATE DR STE 200
`(cid:160) (cid:160) (cid:160)(cid:160) (cid:160) (cid:160) TROY, MI 48098-2683
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`APPLICANT: Panasonic Corporation
`
`(cid:160) (cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`(cid:160) (cid:160) (cid:160)
`(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`(cid:160) (cid:160)(cid:160)
`CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO :(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS:(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`(cid:160) 9432-200571-
`
`docketingtm@hdp.com
`
`OFFICE ACTION
`
`STRICT DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER
`TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S
`COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW.
`
`(cid:160)I
`
`SSUE/MAILING DATE: 3/3/2015
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`he referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney.(cid:160) Applicant must respond timely and completely to
`the issue(s) below.(cid:160) 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
`
`(cid:160)S
`
`UMMARY OF ISSUES that applicant must address:
`
`Section 2(d) Refusal- Likelihood of Confusion (limited to specified goods/services)
`Prior Filed Application
`Disclaimer
`Suspension Advisory
`
`SECTION 2(d) REFUSAL – LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`his refusal is limited to the goods in class 9 and "Computer hardware installation and repair, including mobile performance of such services on
`customer premises" in class 37 and "Installation and repair of computer software, including mobile performance of such services on customer
`
`premises" in class 42.(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`Registration of the applied-for mark is refused because of a likelihood of confusion with the mark in U.S. Registration No. 3610580.(cid:160) Trademark
`Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); see TMEP §§1207.01 et seq.(cid:160) See the enclosed registration.
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`rademark Act Section 2(d) bars registration of an applied-for mark that so resembles a registered mark that it is likely a potential consumer
`would be confused, mistaken, or deceived as to the source of the goods and/or services of the applicant and registrant.(cid:160) See 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).(cid:160)
`A determination of likelihood of confusion under Section 2(d) is made on a case-by case basis and the factors set forth in In re E. I. du Pont de
`Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (C.C.P.A. 1973) aid in this determination.(cid:160) Citigroup Inc. v. Capital City Bank Grp., Inc., 637
`F.3d 1344, 1349, 98 USPQ2d 1253, 1256 (Fed. Cir. 2011) (citing On-Line Careline, Inc. v. Am. Online, Inc., 229 F.3d 1080, 1085, 56 USPQ2d
`1471, 1474 (Fed. Cir. 2000)).(cid:160) Not all the du Pont factors, however, are necessarily relevant or of equal weight, and any one of the factors may
`control in a given case, depending upon the evidence of record.(cid:160) Citigroup Inc. v. Capital City Bank Grp., Inc., 637 F.3d at 1355, 98 USPQ2d at
`1260; In re Majestic Distilling Co., 315 F.3d 1311, 1315, 65 USPQ2d 1201, 1204 (Fed. Cir. 2003); see In re E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476
`F.2d at 1361-62, 177 USPQ at 567.
`
`(cid:160)I
`
`n this case, the following factors are the most relevant:(cid:160) similarity of the marks, similarity and nature of the goods and/or services, and similarity
`of the trade channels of the goods and/or services.(cid:160) See In re Viterra Inc., 671 F.3d 1358, 1361-62, 101 USPQ2d 1905, 1908 (Fed. Cir. 2012); In
`re Dakin’s Miniatures Inc. , 59 USPQ2d 1593, 1595-96 (TTAB 1999); TMEP §§1207.01 et seq.
`
`(cid:160)
`(cid:160)
`(cid:160)
`(cid:160)
`(cid:160)
`(cid:160)
`

`

`(cid:160)C
`
`omparison of the Marks:
`
`(cid:160)A
`
`pplicant’s mark is PANASONIC SECURITY DNA displayed in a standard characters format. Registrant’s mark is SECURE DNA displayed
`in a standard characters format. The marks are similar in that both marks include the wording DNA and similar wording.(cid:160) The marks are
`different in that applicant's mark includes the additional term PANASONIC.(cid:160) Despite these differences, the applicant’s proposed mark is
`virtually identical in sound and appearance to the registered mark as detailed below, and creates the same commercial impression.
`
`(cid:160)M
`
`arks are compared in their entireties for similarities in appearance, sound, connotation, and commercial impression.(cid:160) Stone Lion Capital
`Partners, LP v. Lion Capital LLP, 746 F.3d 1317, 1321, 110 USPQ2d 1157, 1160 (Fed. Cir. 2014) (quoting Palm Bay Imps., Inc. v. Veuve
`Clicquot Ponsardin Maison Fondee En 1772, 396 F. 3d 1369, 1371, 73 USPQ2d 1689, 1691 (Fed. Cir. 2005)); TMEP §1207.01(b)-(b)(v).(cid:160)
`“Similarity in any one of these elements may be sufficient to find the marks confusingly similar.” (cid:160) In re Davia, 110 USPQ2d 1810, 1812 (TTAB
`2014) (citing In re White Swan Ltd., 8 USPQ2d 1534, 1535 (TTAB 1988); In re 1st USA Realty Prof’ls , Inc., 84 USPQ2d 1581, 1586 (TTAB
`2007)); TMEP §1207.01(b).
`
`(cid:160)W
`
`hen comparing marks, the test is not whether the marks can be distinguished in a side-by-side comparison, but rather whether the marks are
`sufficiently similar in terms of their overall commercial impression that confusion as to the source of the goods and/or services offered under the
`respective marks is likely to result.(cid:160) Midwestern Pet Foods, Inc. v. Societe des Produits Nestle S.A., 685 F.3d 1046, 1053, 103 USPQ2d 1435,
`1440 (Fed. Cir. 2012); In re Davia, 110 USPQ2d 1810, 1813 (TTAB 2014); TMEP §1207.01(b).(cid:160) The proper focus is on the recollection of the
`average purchaser, who retains a general rather than specific impression of trademarks.(cid:160) United Global Media Grp., Inc. v. Tseng, 112 USPQ2d
`1039, 1049, (TTAB 2014); L’Oreal S.A. v. Marcon, 102 USPQ2d 1434, 1438 (TTAB 2012); TMEP §1207.01(b).
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`he registrant's mark includes the wording SECURE DNA while applicant's mark includes the wording SECURITY DNA.(cid:160) Marks may be
`confusingly similar in appearance where similar terms or phrases or similar parts of terms or phrases appear in the compared marks and create a
`similar overall commercial impression.(cid:160) See Crocker Nat’l Bank v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, 228 USPQ 689, 690-91 (TTAB
`1986), aff’d sub nom. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v. Wells Fargo Bank, Nat’l Ass’n , 811 F.2d 1490, 1495, 1 USPQ2d 1813, 1817
`(Fed. Cir. 1987) (finding COMMCASH and COMMUNICASH confusingly similar); In re Corning Glass Works, 229 USPQ 65, 66 (TTAB
`1985) (finding CONFIRM and CONFIRMCELLS confusingly similar); In re Pellerin Milnor Corp., 221 USPQ 558, 560 (TTAB 1983) (finding
`MILTRON and MILLTRONICS confusingly similar); TMEP §1207.01(b)(ii)-(iii).
`
`(cid:160)R
`
`egistrant's mark is missing the additional term PANASONIC found in applicant's mark.(cid:160) The mere deletion of wording from a registered mark
`may not be sufficient to overcome a likelihood of confusion.(cid:160) See In re Mighty Leaf Tea, 601 F.3d 1342, 94 USPQ2d 1257 (Fed. Cir. 2010); In re
`Optica Int’l , 196 USPQ 775, 778 (TTAB 1977); TMEP §1207.01(b)(ii)-(iii).(cid:160) Applicant’s mark does not create a distinct commercial
`impression because it contains the same common wording as the registered mark, and there is no other wording to distinguish it from the
`registered mark.
`
`(cid:160)I
`
`n sum, given the highly similar appearance and sound of the marks, it follows that the marks create a highly similar commercial impression and
`therefore the marks are confusingly similar.
`
`(cid:160)C
`
`omparison of the Goods/Services:
`
`(cid:160)A
`
`pplicant’s goods and services are "Surveillance cameras; Image recording apparatus; Image encoding apparatus, namely, encoders; Rack
`mount computer servers and storage systems; Computer network adapters, switches, routers, hubs and PoE midspans; Computer monitors;
`Computer software for browsing video contents, selecting video clips, and downloading video clips; Personal Computers; Computer network
`bridges; PoE switches; Image decoding apparatus" in class 9 and "Computer hardware installation and repair, including mobile performance of
`such services on customer premises" in class 37 and "Installation and repair of computer software, including mobile performance of such
`services on customer premises" in class 42.(cid:160) Registrant’s services are "Computer consultation in the field of computer security; Computer
`security service, namely, restricting access to and by computer networks to and of undesired web sites, media and individuals and facilities;
`
`Development of software for secure network operations" in class 42 and "Monitoring of computer systems for security purposes" in class 45.(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`As the case law and attached evidence shows, applicant’s and registrant’s services are commercially related.
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`he goods and/or services of the parties need not be identical or even competitive to find a likelihood of confusion.(cid:160) See On-line Careline Inc. v.
`Am. Online Inc., 229 F.3d 1080, 1086, 56 USPQ2d 1471, 1475 (Fed. Cir. 2000); Recot, Inc. v. Becton, 214 F.3d 1322, 1329, 54 USPQ2d
`1894, 1898 (Fed. Cir. 2000) (“[E] ven if the goods in question are different from, and thus not related to, one another in kind, the same goods
`
`can be related in the mind of the consuming public as to the origin of the goods.”); TMEP §1207.01(a)( i).(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`The respective goods and/or services need only be “related in some manner and/or if the circumstances surrounding their marketing [be] such
`that they could give rise to the mistaken belief that [the goods and/or services] emanate from the same source.” (cid:160) Coach Servs., Inc. v. Triumph
`Learning LLC, 668 F.3d 1356, 1369, 101 USPQ2d 1713, 1722 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (quoting 7-Eleven Inc. v. Wechsler, 83 USPQ2d 1715, 1724
`(TTAB 2007)); TMEP §1207.01(a)(i).
`
`

`

`(cid:160)T
`
`he attached Internet evidence consists of various third party websites showing entities that provide security cameras also provide
`software/hardware installation and computer consultation services.(cid:160) This evidence establishes that the same entity commonly
`manufactures/produces/provides the relevant goods and/or services and markets the goods and/or services under the same mark, the relevant
`goods and/or services are sold or provided through the same trade channels and used by the same classes of consumers in the same fields of use,
`and the goods and/or services are similar or complementary in terms of purpose or function.(cid:160) Therefore, applicant’s and registrant’s goods
`and/or services are considered related for likelihood of confusion purposes.(cid:160) See, e.g., In re Davey Prods. Pty Ltd., 92 USPQ2d 1198, 1202-04
`(TTAB 2009); In re Toshiba Med. Sys. Corp., 91 USPQ2d 1266, 1268-69, 1271-72 (TTAB 2009).
`
`(cid:160)E
`
`vidence obtained from the Internet may be used to support a determination under Trademark Act Section 2(d) that goods and/or services are
`related.(cid:160) See, e.g., In re G.B.I. Tile & Stone, Inc., 92 USPQ2d 1366, 1371 (TTAB 2009); In re Paper Doll Promotions, Inc., 84 USPQ2d 1660,
`1668 (TTAB 2007).
`
`(cid:160)I
`
`n total, the marks create the same commercial impression and the evidence shows that the goods and services are commercially related and
`likely to be encountered together in the marketplace by consumers. Therefore, consumers are likely to be confused and mistakenly believe that
`the goods and services originate from a common source. Therefore, there is a likelihood of confusion and registration must be refused under
`Section 2(d) of the Lanham Act.
`
`(cid:160)A
`
`lthough applicant’s mark has been refused registration, applicant may respond to the refusal(s) by submitting evidence and arguments in
`support of registration.
`
`(cid:160)I
`
`f applicant responds to the refusal(s), applicant must also respond to the requirement(s) set forth below.
`
`(cid:160)P
`
`RIOR-FILED APPLICATION(S)
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`he filing date of pending U.S. Application Serial No. 86429573 precedes applicant’s filing date.(cid:160) See attached referenced application.(cid:160) If the
`mark in the referenced application registers, applicant’s mark may be refused registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d) because of a
`likelihood of confusion between the two marks.(cid:160) See 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); 37 C.F.R. §2.83; TMEP §§1208 et seq.(cid:160) Therefore, upon receipt of
`applicant’s response to this Office action, action on this application may be suspended pending final disposition of the earlier-filed referenced
`application.
`
`(cid:160)I
`
`n response to this Office action, applicant may present arguments in support of registration by addressing the issue of the potential conflict
`between applicant’s mark and the mark in the referenced application.(cid:160) Applicant’s election not to submit arguments at this time in no way limits
`applicant’s right to address this issue later if a refusal under Section 2(d) issues.
`
`(cid:160)D
`
`ISCLAIMER REQUIRED
`
`(cid:160)A
`
`pplicant must disclaim the wording “SECURITY” in the mark because it merely describes an ingredient, quality, characteristic, function,
`feature, purpose, or use of applicant’s goods and/or services, and thus is an unregistrable component of the mark.(cid:160) See 15 U.S.C. §§1052(e)(1),
`1056(a); DuoProSS Meditech Corp. v. Inviro Med. Devices, Ltd., 695 F.3d 1247, 1251, 103 USPQ2d 1753, 1755 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (quoting In re
`
`Oppedahl & Larson LLP, 373 F.3d 1171, 1173, 71 USPQ2d 1370, 1371 (Fed. Cir. 2004)); TMEP §§1213, 1213.03(a).(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`The attached evidence from various third party websites show that SECURITY is often used in connection with goods and services that are the
`
`same or similar to applicant's goods and services the describe the purpose, feature, or characteristic of the goods or services.(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`An applicant may not claim exclusive rights to terms that others may need to use to describe their goods and/or services in the marketplace.(cid:160) See
`Dena Corp. v. Belvedere Int’l, Inc. , 950 F.2d 1555, 1560, 21 USPQ2d 1047, 1051 (Fed. Cir. 1991); In re Aug. Storck KG, 218 USPQ 823, 825
`(TTAB 1983).(cid:160) A disclaimer of unregistrable matter does not affect the appearance of the mark; that is, a disclaimer does not physically remove
`the disclaimed matter from the mark.(cid:160) See Schwarzkopf v. John H. Breck, Inc., 340 F.2d 978, 978, 144 USPQ 433, 433 (C.C.P.A. 1965); TMEP
`
`§1213.(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`If applicant does not provide the required disclaimer, the USPTO may refuse to register the entire mark.(cid:160) See In re Stereotaxis Inc., 429 F.3d
`1039, 1040-41, 77 USPQ2d 1087, 1088-89 (Fed. Cir. 2005); TMEP §1213.01(b).
`
`(cid:160)A
`
`pplicant should submit a disclaimer in the following standardized format:
`
`No claim is made to the exclusive right to use “SECURITY” apart from the mark as shown.
`
`(cid:160)F
`
`or an overview of disclaimers and instructions on how to satisfy this disclaimer requirement online using the Trademark Electronic Application
`System (TEAS) form, please go to http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/law/disclaimer.jsp.
`
`(cid:160)
`(cid:160)
`

`

`SUSPENSION ADVISORY
`
`(cid:160)U
`
`pon resolution of all issues raised herein, applicant is advised that the application may be suspended pending final disposition of the earlier-
`
`filed referenced application.(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`RESPONSE GUIDELINES
`
`(cid:160)I
`
`f applicant has questions regarding this Office action, please telephone or e-mail the assigned trademark examining attorney.(cid:160) All relevant e-
`mail communications will be placed in the official application record; however, an e-mail communication will not be accepted as a response to
`this Office action and will not extend the deadline for filing a proper response.(cid:160) See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-
`.05.(cid:160) Further, although the trademark examining attorney may provide additional explanation pertaining to the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in
`this Office action, the trademark examining attorney may not provide legal advice or statements about applicant’s rights.(cid:160) See TMEP §§705.02,
`709.06.
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`o expedite prosecution of the application, applicant is encouraged to file its response to this Office action online via the Trademark Electronic
`Application System (TEAS), which is available at http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/index.jsp.(cid:160) If applicant has technical questions about the
`TEAS
`response
`to Office
`action
`form,
`applicant
`can
`review the
`electronic
`filing
`tips
`available
`online
`at
`http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/e_filing_tips.jsp and e-mail technical questions to TEAS@uspto.gov.
`
`TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL
`REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE:(cid:160) Applicants who filed their application
`online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to
`Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address;
`and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application.(cid:160) See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b),
`2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820.(cid:160) TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of
`$50 per international class of goods and/or services.(cid:160) 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04.(cid:160) However, in certain
`situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone without
`
`incurring this additional fee.(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)(cid:160)
`
`/Q Queen/
`Examining Attorney
`Law Office 111
`571-272-6695
`Esther.Queen@uspto.gov
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`O RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: (cid:160) Go to http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp. (cid:160) Please wait 48-72 hours from the
`issue/mailing date before using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), to allow for necessary system updates of the application.(cid:160)
`For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov.(cid:160) For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned
`trademark examining attorney.(cid:160) E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions; therefore, do not respond to
`this Office action by e-mail.
`
`(cid:160)A
`
`ll informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.
`
`(cid:160)W
`
`HO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE:(cid:160) It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an
`applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants).(cid:160) If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the
`
`response.(cid:160)(cid:160)
`PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION: (cid:160) To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official
`notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at
`http://tsdr.uspto.gov/. (cid:160) Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen. (cid:160) If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the
`Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199. (cid:160) For more information on checking
`status, see http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/process/status/.
`
`(cid:160)T
`
`O UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS:(cid:160) Use the TEAS form at http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.
`
`(cid:160)
`(cid:160)(cid:160)
`

`

`Pfini:Feh23,2fl15
`
`77384908
`
`DESIGN MARK
`
`Serial Number
`11384908
`
`Status
`REGISTERED
`
`Word Mark
`SECURE DNA
`
`Standard Character Marl:
`Yes
`
`Registration Number
`3610580
`
`Date Registered
`2DDSxD4x21
`
`Type of Marin:
`SERVICE MARK
`
`Register
`SUPPLEMENTAL
`
`Mark Drawing Code
`[4]
`STANDARD CHARACTER MARK
`
`Owner
`Secure DNA Consulting, Inc. CORPORATION NEVADA 680 Iwilei Rd., Loft
`420 Honolulu HAWAII 9681?
`
`Goodsfserviees
`
`G & S: Computer
`100 101.
`US
`IC 042.
`Class Status -- ACTIVE.
`Consultation in the field of Computer security: Computer security
`service, namely, restricting access to and by computer networks to and
`of undesired web sites. media and individuals and facilities;
`Development of software for secure network operations. First Use:
`2007/llfifll. First Use In Commerce: 2007fllfOl.
`
`Goodsiservices
`G & S: Monitoring of
`100 101.
`US
`IC 045.
`Class Status —— ACTIVE.
`computer systems for security purposes. First Use: 2OOTfllfUl. First
`Use In Commerce: 200?fllfOl.
`
`Filing Date
`2008fO1f3O
`
`Amended Register Date
`2009HO1f21
`
`

`

`Print: Feb 23, 2015
`
`77384-908
`
`Examining Attorney
`PILPLRO, MARK
`
`Attumey of Record
`Zachary J . Hntalis
`
`

`

`Secure DNA
`
`

`

`Pfini:Feh23,2fl15
`
`BB4295T3
`
`DESIGN MARK
`
`Serial Number
`864295T3
`
`Status
`NoN—EINAL ACTICN — MAILED
`
`Word Mark
`SECURITY DNA
`
`Standard Character Mark
`Yes
`
`Type of Merit
`SERVICE MARK
`
`Register
`PRINCIPAL
`
`Mark Drawing Code
`[4]
`STANDARD CHARACTER MARK
`
`Ovmer
`Trustwave Holdings, Inc. CORPORATION DELAWARE TD West Madison Street,
`Suite 1050 Chicago ILLINOIS 60606
`
`Goodsiservices
`
`G & S: Consulting in
`100 101.
`US
`IC 042.
`Class Status -- ACTIVE.
`the nature of Computer information security and Compliance
`assessments; consulting in the field of data protection, automated
`data protection, risk management, and threat intelligence; computer
`network security policy development: database, network, and
`application testing, scanning and information security management; all
`in the field of computer information security.
`
`Filing Date
`20l4flOf2l
`
`Examining Attorney
`JOHNSON, DONALD
`
`Attorney of Record
`Joseph T. Jasper
`
`

`

`SECURITY DNA
`
`

`

`' A L I A D 0
`our Foundation, Ynur Advanrmge
`
`143833734580
`
`Home
`
`IT Slcur ty
`
`IT In astrucklre
`
`Rrsk Manageme
`
` Frnject Mananem:
`
`About
`
`Careers
`
`Conhct Us
`
`mum Cmsulfim Sm“,
`Inrnsrnicmi; consulfinl SHVIO5
`Teennurnm Salmon:
`cram: Cnllullflllu sen-cs:
`Pmiec1 I. pmgnrn in-imgneni
`Emu
`hm“
`lieu!
`
`_
`
`snannmg suvmiers Iricmdmg Nemmz, VMwzre am cemrrwaun‘ brznds irke IBM, HP am Orade. and reenrmlngy Starks‘ we
`exienu 2VAR‘s aesrgn and implernenlanun capsmrmes, Cunsulliru; Services frnm Ahann Pmrssronzi serviceseeiwernignry
`Izained and certified starnn ass$s,de‘.5Igr\,D|an.I1eDII7y and manage aemurenerrsive, crns5—\.'em1nr suhmnnslurynm nients
`wrm these uwar3IIeIen is/Sums and merr 51andamIzEd, repeaiame pmcessal yuurnisposal, mere is virtually no irnir mine
`samarrs VAR: can wviue to end user customers.
`Ennis areas Illchlde
`_ DATA CENTER
`
`' SYORAGE "' SEWER. BUSINESS :5 SEGURITV
`. SOFIWARE
`. PROJECT MANAGEMENT
`DAIA CENTER
`Aldo assist our Reseuer partners and their clients with me HEIEVI‘ depiflvment, and sucaemtm onerahnri ulfmndaliurial
`cure IT nirasuucmie premiers wnemer Iucaneu III a single data center eracruss mumple remme flala eerueis
`STORAGE A SERVER
`we focus an me key s1araoe and server Lethnumgwes thatare nan orevery mrrln-'iny‘5 Irlflashuclule we oner semces
`Incluzfing‘ hm nm lrrrmedIn:
`. Anfiysls nesugn planning execmmn and accumerrmren ersremgeanuserver envirunrnerus
`. Assessmans and Hezllh checks lnrslorage. Servers, SAN, M5 and an nerwurked storage
`. Migrafiun services
`BUSINESS A SECURITY
`we ewe’ nrusiness. cloud and semrriy cunsulIing Servtes Ihzl cevenhe foflawirlfi dis ries
`. cseun Bxsinss Slmlegy Wurksnop
`. Cinud DrsmueryAssssrnem
`. creud Reamness Assessment
`. claud Sammy Risk Assessmerrl
`. Secumy Risk a.vmneramIiIy Assessments
`. Appiicamn ‘ wen ur Physical Setum Assessments
`. Rsuuieiarv cemmiarrce
`. Fancy Assessment] Design
`. Forensics
`. Wireless seeumy Assessments
`SOFIWARE
`we we snnwaie assessments, DIarInIn9. desrgn and depmynrem services amass: brand speclnim a1cA, ccnmwauu, IBM,
`HP, Mmree, war.-ei, Oracle rsun and Sylrlamec fll.ENIDI01]I€5IIIEILfllIVVfl
`. Assessmemsvar unqraaes and mngrariorrs
`. Mumlunng and Perfurrmlrne Marragernem
`. seumy and euvemance
`.
`\l|rIuaizalInIi managernenl
`. clusierirrg and Drsasner Recovery
`. Daraaase
`. Mimierme
`
`PROJECT MAMAGEIIENT
`Aime prujettmsnzgemem sen/ICE empawer me ReseuerIn reeus en customer mariagemem av fllhef misirress enrseauun:
`we we s1afi augmenL!|Iurr as well aslhree IeveI5 or urareu rnanagemenisewim-.5
`. Gnld
`. Siwsr
`. amrrze
`
`2i‘27.I2015 Ii 01 AM
`
`

`

`Seam enureslore ere
`
`,0
`
`r.
`
`-
`
`r.
`
`AT|] Enmputers
`nma I:|iI:
`.aH su1utiIJns_
`lg‘
`
`My Account Menuremrreue My wushnst
`
`(he(koul
`
`‘restrmuruels
`
`Log In My cam $n.nn
`
`My Cart
`You rave no items m vuur
`shappirlg cart.
` Am Cornvmem t533¢‘
`Box Cameras
`Bullet Cameras
`Covert Cameras
`Dome Cameras
`Vflzcusmmel Remains
`rem rwwkadls
`o ..1..m,..1"'a.um.r. o
` er Answer:
`An) a...,...n...
`rmeu
`-kg-kg,
`152 remeuns
`?a4dlaE4t£.ga 9
`:z’zc\s I:'.A.v-Inn
`
`a3 '
`PTZ Cameras
`Connectors
`
`E‘
`Misc
`
` Housing Cameras
`
` cej
`Video Baiuns
`Brackets
`Housings
`
`Cable
`
`DIY Combo Kits
`
`—
`DVR Systems
`
`HD—SDI
`
`Lens
`
`OPEN BOX ITEMS
`SHOP Now ,
`
`Power Supplies
`
`Mukiplexer
`
`NEWSLETIER
`
`FOLLOW US
`
`smpprrrg Pcrhcy
`CUSTOMER SERVICE
`rn :1 E‘x:harrge
`Prwac, Puhcy
`
`Bmg
`ABOUT US
`Cornrnurmty Rebtxurrs
`Tesnrrrcrnrexs
`Ln::a\ ,
`re sawrgs.
`
`mu Free
`899.21:-F9
`NEED HELP?
`cu
`ta Us
`Rh ;. Fequesf
`ar ed
`
`0 O Q @ O
`an
`27.;..b.r515_r2.;M,
`0 §5“¥E":"_
`
`MYACCOUNT
`
`men
`
`ATD Comuuters is not responsrme for tvvogmulucal ermrs and/ur mvahd Droducl images. Must Images are uf actual
`broducts but m same cases mav he a reurasentatmn nrme Dmduct. Hesse (heck part numbers r You are unsure.
`Waduas srremep | Category Srtemap
`© zms ATD (umuuters - AH Righu Reserved.
`
`VISA
`
`'
`
`“mm
`4
`
`W."
`
`

`

`ATD Computer Solutions
`Your Direct Source Far Computer 5 IT Services
`Contact Us Today: 704-405-2800
`52 umy
`Rurvexltan 2
`
`VT boluemn
`
`OneCare
`
`Seirth Pmducls
`Follow Us On:
`
`P
`
`
`We ave pleased mu: pmme you mm 2 mi FREE cmsmmiunomzy sn yuu will he mnmemmmyuu
`"nostrings almanac‘
`mm are nmevesteu. smmy contact us or use meturm nelwrm set up an anummuenl.
`nusconsunamn mu aumv you to expenemeourservices nsk—sm.e nos umpmzn man ynu mu tmmaluhle walkingmm us m mus vnal area Inclunm wn
`mus nee sessmn you will have an mwmhmllvIn:
`Get in mm: us new
`mew In our snammm me umerent pmuuctswe mar
`Shave I1ue:1inns,mmmerl|s urconcernsaboutpasonal security
`Discover mm ATD Cumputerscan Help
`
`Oorllact UsTnmy FurAmg: cnnsnmuu
`Requied fielasare mamea ‘
`= Full Name:
`‘Puma Nmme:
`' Email:
`€}ue:11ms0rCmImn1s
`
`msofl
`W1 ndows 7
`-
`Ir F‘
`-
`
`Fast. Elllulenl. And Sman
`
`Fave! Pmcunm mm-nu
`Paws? Imnemuams
`
`PC componentsB251 Selim
`Cmlm Kils
`cmueae 3Ya1eln
`cmunums
`Lamps
`SENHS
`
`Secumy & Surveillance
`Alzrn System
`Survalhnce Equipment
`Instznanun semms
`Prmen Panfnin
`Free cmsunamn
`
`IT Solutions
`
`Meruumnn
`Dam mum
`(P05) Pam otsale
`WOIF)Vn:ca overIP
`Wehslce Ilevebplvlzrvl
`
`Sennce & SupportAm RepairCalls!
`On SineService
`Tecnlicil Swnun
`CmmrnerService
`owner sums
`
`Hanson mu,“
`ctnrlmn u.-.-----..». \/.\|
`
`

`

`ATD Computer SOIUHOFIS
`Your Direct Source Far Computer 5 IT Services
`Contact Us Today: 704-405-2800
`se umy Rurvelllan e
`VT boluilan
`
`8: euupcln
`
`«’\neCare
`
`[
`semh Pmdmj
`Follow Us on:
`
`
`Are you leaking lnr a surveillance wsmm mvrmectynur ncrnenmlremes nIfilnlI2s7 Muninming yuur mmDillY Dl0\1u£|'MtY ur emnluyee behaviors?
`Bebre you liuyarly survelliance camera Smear yuu need to lie clearan wily you need ii and nowrialrlrlg II will beriefll you. wnellier you are lurrlclrlg for
`a securw syslernluryuur name. basin ur hruer mmmertiil nwiecls, ATD czl puuviue ynuvlrilfl III-2 necmaryeciuiumenl and SIIIIDOTI tn ensure me
`ion is mmplelm wim szlisfaflinn
`ATD is arull sennce surveillancecameia mmnanr locarea m onamne, Ncflll camina we snecialize Ill camera equinmenl sales, lniialmmn &
`services, training anu consulizlian. Elmervou are lonlling la Durcrlase a connecionx needing IM|cDlT|D\e1eIrIS'€i\IaborI.ATD can do ll
`we tally rull line orocivequipmemam onerlive memo n D|Jl’lIEMy ‘iflfllfl square reel snumoam, llallmts uur cusmrrecsruvieiume image quality in
`me pvnducls and lalk in ourlmminedgeable md friendly technical stalrbelme nurcnase,
`when lcomes to lnsrallaliun. our qualmea aecnrliuan wil ensure you su-vellanreequlnrneniwill wont nmneny inynur la:llity and wwaeyouman me
`necessary hiinirln we ulrermsile renairs and any an extensive mge atrenlacement nailsln ensurefaulty ur uarnaged equinmenl can return rm
`repmemem as quimy as possmle
`ATD mslallecl surveillance syslenisann pmviaen services my name lrrhlsinaues big am small, noun offilze, Retail,R§12umm, scnnul, Resmenlial
`Cammunmiwawenmfii err.-..
`wen uurrecenlly cumpleveu nrriecls TFair. Elrlulenl. And Srnan
`ounnisslnn is la rirrwraeme rnlm
`are and men wecnnolauy nlloaucts
`attheinner alrnrrlaule nncinu kn nutcustnrners
`
`loso
`fl
`W‘ ndows 7
`-
`-
`ll‘
`l
`:
`F
`H I
`
`Resnerml
`
`'8 TT power Proeunm Dalrlnml
`
`newer Imriemuarus
`scnuui rnaycare
`
`pc cmnpong.-.95
`3251 Sen,“
`cm“ Km
`cmum ._,-mm
`Liam,
`c,,,‘,.,,E,,,,
`servers
`
`'-
`'
`
`Security & Surveillance
`Alzrn ‘awslem
`Survalhrrce Equlpmenl
`lnstallanun SEMEEE
`Free cmsullamn
`Prolen Punrnin
`
`_
`
`‘
`
`IT Solutions
`
`Neiuurklru
`uaia manner
`(P05) Pam orsale
`wensrce ueuelopmenl
`iv0lF1vuce over [F
`
`Service & Support
`Am Reuaircmier
`on sinesewice
`recnrical Swnun
`'
`omer slams
`‘ Cmlmfifsewine
`
`efiflrfifi E l__LD_CEIl'lFlED mm NONI
`a.-me
`
`

`

`Ei'n=rl'S9n E Urib
`
`!a 5 r
`
`r
`
`Aumo l: E §[F
`SONOS
`7
`
`03IO3f20158 44AM
`
`Listen to all me lflusm
`where ll lives.
`mi love. No r...-mer
`
`Glfi ldsas
`
`F‘.Sgl§Il"_\
`
`rd;-r Slams E Stare Finder
`
`Slslnlrl C’ DISCOVER TOP DEALS Save on HDWs_ cell phnrles. Iapnwps and more, Shop now I
`
`PRODUCTS
`
`SERVICES
`
`DEA S
`
`~~
`
`‘
`
`"
`
`"
`
`Q
`
`Be5lBuy r Heme » Home Aumnialinn 3 Security v Security Cameras 3 Systems
`ameras
`
`seleei 1 ta 4 items to compare
`CD'lll|)al e
`
`C”R"E"T°“E'“
`l_l Free Shlpplng Eligible
`ieaa)
`l_l On SaIe(l92l
`O I
`l
`“'e‘ ‘em ‘7’
`L‘
`BRAND
`
`AW,
`U ‘W5 (1 “W
`U SW“ ml
`U Bum W
`U SW W
`l_l Panasumc my
`
`JA|l|nems(1,145)
`Sort by:
`East Selling
`
`BestBuy|tams(145)
`v Items per page:
`
`Marketplace5e||el'ltems(1,D0|)]
`15 v
`(
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3 E
`
`77
`
`
`
`l
`en Add to Compare
`
`, ,,,,,EE,,,A,c,, GUAAANTEE
`Dropcam - Pro Wireless High-Definition Video
`Monitoring Camera - Black
`
`$199.99
`...i.e.=uce.m2,mai sKu:s419n5s
`resululiun at an ips (flames per sei;L7nI1);nIgI'it\IIsK)n up ID 25'.
`CompaI'lblewlIliselectlOSandAnd: ddevices;7Zflp —
`9"
`P
`Cluudhasad Wl—Fl video mcnlluiing; 6D—sBczllid meme setup;
`‘
`’ ’:9U5"‘”“"“»‘ ”'“ Om" 535
`Ex mam
`firjrjrjri
`4.5 (372 Reviews}
`Check Shlpplrlg 8. Availability
`
`_ spew my
`Ll Dal-mmI>
`SEEN, mm
`PRICE
`Ll Lees man $50 ms)
`\_l 350 — $99 99(1E‘r5l
`Ll 3100 V $14‘39‘3l165)
`Samsung — smancam HE) Pro Wireless High-
`A4 mu 7 isia9,a9lsm
`Definition Security camera—wi.iie
`*
`E
`A W, _ WAEAAW
`Mmkl:5NHP6A1flEN i
`sxu: 7737122
`SAMSUNG SmaI1Cam HD Pro Wlleless HIgh—Defillmon
`D 5250 V $49939 (mu)
`Security camera: 1/2 a" was sensor, upie maup resnlulian;
`Ll same A $749 99 ll D0)
`IR mglii vision up in 16', 2-way iaik ieamre, motion and audio
`deem, motlonzune gee. suppuns we viewing an —
`‘
`'
`U 575° ' 5999-99 “W
`seleeimomle devices
`. Free Shlunllla an Orders 535
`mp Ilwwwbeslbuy comlsrlelvideo-surveillarice-syS|a11sJl\orI'ie-suwe1||aI\ce-4zmelasfpmK:a125400UO50005 c‘?Id:pclnca1254Ul]005(]005
`
`u !
`, ,,,,,EE,,,A,E,, GUARANTEE
`:2‘-i_‘i‘rik - wireless Network Surv

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket