To:
`
`Subject:
`
`Sent:
`
`Sent As:
`
`Attachments:
`
`Panasonic Corporation (trademark@hsml.com)
`
`U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 88183392 - LAST 10-MILE - 8279.1980US0
`
`1/29/2019 9:43:57 PM
`
`ECOM114@USPTO.GOV
`
`Attachment - 1
`Attachment - 2
`Attachment - 3
`Attachment - 4
`Attachment - 5
`Attachment - 6
`Attachment - 7
`Attachment - 8
`Attachment - 9
`Attachment - 10
`Attachment - 11
`Attachment - 12
`Attachment - 13
`Attachment - 14
`Attachment - 15
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)
`
`OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION
`
`*88183392*
`
`CLICK HERE TO RESPOND TO THIS
`LETTER:
`
`http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp
`
`VIEW YOUR APPLICATION FILE
`
`U.S. APPLICATION
`SERIAL NO.   88183392
`
`           
`
`MARK: LAST 10-MILE
`
`CORRESPONDENT
`ADDRESS:
`  
`       SARAH G.
`VOELLER
`
`           HAMRE,
`SCHUMANN,
`MUELLER & LARSON,
`P.C.
`
`         45 SOUTH
`SEVENTH STREET,
`SUITE 2700
`
`           MINNEAPOLIS, MN
`55402
`
`    
`
`   
`
`APPLICANT: Panasonic
`Corporation
`
`    
`
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
`

`

`CORRESPONDENT’S
`REFERENCE/DOCKET
`
`NO:       
`
`  8279.1980US0
`
`   
`
`CORRESPONDENT E-
`
`MAIL ADDRESS:       
`
`trademark@hsml.com
`
`OFFICE ACTION
`
`STRICT DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER
`TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S
`COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW.   A RESPONSE
`TRANSMITTED THROUGH THE TRADEMARK ELECTRONIC APPLICATION SYSTEM (TEAS) MUST BE RECEIVED BEFORE
`MIDNIGHT EASTERN TIME OF THE LAST DAY OF THE RESPONSE PERIOD.
`
`ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 1/29/2019
`
`The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney.  Applicant must respond timely and completely to
`the issues below.  15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
`
`PRIOR-FILED APPLICATION
`
`The filing date of pending U.S. Application Serial No. 87243126 precedes applicant’s filing date.  See attached referenced application.  If the
`mark in the referenced application registers, applicant’s mark may be refused registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d) because of a
`likelihood of confusion between the two marks.  See 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); 37 C.F.R. §2.83; TMEP §§1208 et seq.  Therefore, upon receipt of
`applicant’s response to this Office action, action on this application may be suspended pending final disposition of the earlier-filed referenced
`application.
`
`In response to this Office action, applicant may present arguments in support of registration by addressing the issue of the potential conflict
`between applicant’s mark and the mark in the referenced application.  Applicant’s election not to submit arguments at this time in no way limits
`applicant’s right to address this issue later if a refusal under Section 2(d) issues.
`
`SUMMARY OF ISSUES:
`
`Section 2(d) Refusal – Likelihood of Confusion – This Refusal Applies Only to the Goods Identified Therein
`Identification of Goods and Services
`Significance Inquiry
`Foreign Certificate Required
`
`SECTION 2(d) REFUSAL – LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION – THIS REFUSAL APPLIES ONLY TO THE GOODS IDENTIFIED
`THEREIN
`
`Registration of the applied-for mark LAST 10-MILE is refused because of a likelihood of confusion with the mark LAST MILE in U.S.
`Registration No. 5421043 for the following goods and services:
`
`Class 9: Batteries; Electric batteries for vehicles; Electric batteries for electric vehicles; Battery chargers for electric vehicles;
`
` 
`  
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
`

`

`Class 12: Electric vehicles; Automobiles; Motors and engines for land vehicles; Electric motors for land vehicles; Motorcycles;
`Autonomous emergency brake systems for vehicles; Brake systems for vehicles; Electronic mirrors for vehicles; Vehicle mirrors; Anti-
`theft devices for vehicles; Drones; Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs); Parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods
`
`Class 37: Repair or maintenance of vehicles; Repair or maintenance of automobiles; Battery charging service for motor vehicles; Repair
`or maintenance of automobiles; Car maintenance
`
`Class 39: Vehicle rental; Transportation information; Providing information relating to the operation and location of vehicles; Providing
`information regarding booking for transportation services via a website; Car rental; Electricity distribution for electric vehicles
`
`Class 42: Technical advice relating to operation of computers, automobiles and other machines, apparatus and instruments; Technical
`advice relating to operation and control of autonomous-driving vehicles; Design, development and maintenance of computer systems and
`software for operation and control of autonomous-driving vehicles; Software as a service (SaaS) for operation and control of autonomous-
`driving vehicles;
`
`Class 45: Providing information relating to the location of power charging stations for electric vehicles
`
`Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); see TMEP §§1207.01 et seq.  See the attached registration.
`
`Trademark Act Section 2(d) bars registration of an applied-for mark that is so similar to a registered mark that it is likely consumers would be
`confused, mistaken, or deceived as to the commercial source of the goods and/or services of the parties.  See 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).  Likelihood of
`confusion is determined on a case-by-case basis by applying the factors set forth in In re E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 1361,
`177 USPQ 563, 567 (C.C.P.A. 1973) (called the “ du Pont factors”).   In re i.am.symbolic, llc, 866 F.3d 1315, 1322, 123 USPQ2d 1744, 1747
`(Fed. Cir. 2017).  Only those factors that are “relevant and of record” need be considered.   M2 Software, Inc. v. M2 Commc’ns, Inc. , 450
`F.3d 1378, 1382, 78 USPQ2d 1944, 1947 (Fed. Cir. 2006) (citing Shen Mfg. Co. v. Ritz Hotel Ltd., 393 F.3d 1238, 1241, 73 USPQ2d
`
`1350, 1353 (Fed. Cir. 2004)); see In re Inn at St. John’s, LLC , 126 USPQ2d 1742, 1744 (TTAB 2018).   
`
`Although not all du Pont factors may be relevant, there are generally two key considerations in any likelihood of confusion analysis:  (1) the
`similarities between the compared marks and (2) the relatedness of the compared goods and/or services.  See In re i.am.symbolic, llc, 866 F.3d at
`1322, 123 USPQ2d at 1747 (quoting Herbko Int’l, Inc. v. Kappa Books, Inc. , 308 F.3d 1156, 1164-65, 64 USPQ2d 1375, 1380 (Fed. Cir. 2002));
`Federated Foods, Inc. v. Fort Howard Paper Co., 544 F.2d 1098, 1103, 192 USPQ 24, 29 (C.C.P.A. 1976) (“The fundamental inquiry mandated
`by [Section] 2(d) goes to the cumulative effect of differences in the essential characteristics of the goods [or services] and differences in the
`marks.”); TMEP §1207.01.
`
`COMPARISON OF THE MARKS
`
`Marks are compared in their entireties for similarities in appearance, sound, connotation, and commercial impression.  Stone Lion Capital
`Partners, LP v. Lion Capital LLP, 746 F.3d 1317, 1321, 110 USPQ2d 1157, 1160 (Fed. Cir. 2014) (quoting Palm Bay Imps., Inc. v. Veuve
`Clicquot Ponsardin Maison Fondee En 1772, 396 F.3d 1369, 1371, 73 USPQ2d 1689, 1691 (Fed. Cir. 2005)); TMEP §1207.01(b)-(b)(v). 
`“Similarity in any one of these elements may be sufficient to find the marks confusingly similar.”   In re Inn at St. John’s, LLC , 126 USPQ2d
`1742, 1746 (TTAB 2018) (citing In re Davia, 110 USPQ2d 1810, 1812 (TTAB 2014)); TMEP §1207.01(b).
`
`The applied-for mark LAST 10-MILE and the registered mark LAST MILE make similar overall commercial impressions because the applied-
`for mark merely adds the number “10” and hyphen to the registered mark.   Marks may be confusingly similar in appearance where similar terms
`or phrases or similar parts of terms or phrases appear in the compared marks and create a similar overall commercial impression.  See Crocker
`Nat’l Bank v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce , 228 USPQ 689, 690-91 (TTAB 1986), aff’d sub nom. Canadian Imperial Bank of
`Commerce v. Wells Fargo Bank, Nat’l Ass’n , 811 F.2d 1490, 1495, 1 USPQ2d 1813, 1817 (Fed. Cir. 1987) (finding COMMCASH and
`COMMUNICASH confusingly similar); In re Corning Glass Works, 229 USPQ 65, 66 (TTAB 1985) (finding CONFIRM and
`CONFIRMCELLS confusingly similar); In re Pellerin Milnor Corp., 221 USPQ 558, 560 (TTAB 1983) (finding MILTRON and
`MILLTRONICS confusingly similar); TMEP §1207.01(b)(ii)-(iii).
`
`In the present case the applied-for mark merely adds the number “10” and a hyphen before the word “MILE”, altering the meaning from
`
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
`

`

`identifying one mile to ten miles.  The marks have similar overall meanings because they suggest the attached goods are useful for traveling the
`last short distances of a trip, the applied-for mark merely extends the number of miles.
`
`COMPARISON OF THE GOODS
`
`Applicant’s mark is for the following goods and services:
`
`Class 9: Batteries; Electric batteries for vehicles; Electric batteries for electric vehicles; Battery chargers for electric vehicles;
`
`Class 12: Electric vehicles; Automobiles; Motors and engines for land vehicles; Electric motors for land vehicles; Motorcycles;
`Autonomous emergency brake systems for vehicles; Brake systems for vehicles; Electronic mirrors for vehicles; Vehicle mirrors; Anti-
`theft devices for vehicles; Drones; Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs); Parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods
`
`Class 37: Repair or maintenance of vehicles; Repair or maintenance of automobiles; Battery charging service for motor vehicles; Repair
`or maintenance of automobiles; Car maintenance
`
`Class 39: Vehicle rental; Transportation information; Providing information relating to the operation and location of vehicles; Providing
`information regarding booking for transportation services via a website; Car rental; Electricity distribution for electric vehicles
`
`Class 42: Technical advice relating to operation of computers, automobiles and other machines, apparatus and instruments; Technical
`advice relating to operation and control of autonomous-driving vehicles; Design, development and maintenance of computer systems and
`software for operation and control of autonomous-driving vehicles; Software as a service (SaaS) for operation and control of autonomous-
`driving vehicles;
`
`Class 45: Providing information relating to the location of power charging stations for electric vehicles
`
`Registrant’s mark is for the goods “Vehicles, namely, land vehicles; apparatus for locomotion by land, namely, land vehicles; motor scooters;
`electric scooters; electrically-powered motor vehicles; two-wheeled battery powered and electric vehicles and component parts therefor, namely,
`two-wheeled motorized vehicles; three-wheeled battery powered and electric vehicles and component parts therefor, namely, Three-wheeled
`motor vehicles; four-wheeled battery powered and electric vehicles and component parts therefor, namely, Four-wheeled motor vehicles;
`bicycles; tricycles; go-karts; motorized vehicles and structural parts therefor, namely, land vehicles; land vehicles; motorcycles; motorized and
`non-motorized mobility scooters; motorized golf carts; motorized, electric-powered, self propelled, self-balancing, wheeled personal mobility,
`transportation device; component parts for all of the foregoing; ride-on vehicles, namely, bicycles, mobility scooters and push scooters, and
`motor scooters”.
`
`The compared goods and/or services need not be identical or even competitive to find a likelihood of confusion.  See On-line Careline Inc. v. Am.
`Online Inc., 229 F.3d 1080, 1086, 56 USPQ2d 1471, 1475 (Fed. Cir. 2000); Recot, Inc. v. Becton, 214 F.3d 1322, 1329, 54 USPQ2d 1894, 1898
`(Fed. Cir. 2000); TMEP §1207.01(a)(i).  They need only be “related in some manner and/or if the circumstances surrounding their marketing are
`such that they could give rise to the mistaken belief that [the goods and/or services] emanate from the same source.”   Coach Servs., Inc. v.
`Triumph Learning LLC, 668 F.3d 1356, 1369, 101 USPQ2d 1713, 1722 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (quoting 7-Eleven Inc. v. Wechsler, 83 USPQ2d 1715,
`1724 (TTAB 2007)); TMEP §1207.01(a)(i).
`
`Applicant’s vehicle goods are broadly listed and are identical to or directly overlap the goods listed in the registration.   Determining likelihood
`of confusion is based on the description of the goods and/or services stated in the application and registration at issue, not on extrinsic evidence
`of actual use.  See In re Detroit Athletic Co., 903 F.3d 1297, 1307, 128 USPQ2d 1047, 1052 (Fed. Cir. 2018) (citing In re i.am.symbolic, llc, 866
`
`F.3d 1315, 1325, 123 USPQ2d 1744, 1749 (Fed. Cir. 2017)).   
`
`In this case, the application and registration uses broad wording to describe electric vehicles and automobiles which presumably encompasses all
`goods of the type described, including the more narrowly identified vehicles in each identification. See, e.g., In re Solid State Design Inc., 125
`USPQ2d 1409, 1412-15 (TTAB 2018); Sw. Mgmt., Inc. v. Ocinomled, Ltd., 115 USPQ2d 1007, 1025 (TTAB 2015).  Thus, applicant’s and
`registrant’s goods are legally identical.   See, e.g., In re i.am.symbolic, llc, 127 USPQ2d 1627, 1629 (TTAB 2018) (citing Tuxedo Monopoly, Inc.
`v.Gen. Mills Fun Grp., Inc., 648 F.2d 1335, 1336, 209 USPQ 986, 988 (C.C.P.A. 1981); Inter IKEA Sys. B.V. v. Akea, LLC, 110 USPQ2d 1734,
`1745 (TTAB 2014); Baseball Am. Inc. v. Powerplay Sports Ltd., 71 USPQ2d 1844, 1847 n.9 (TTAB 2004)).
`
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
`

`

`Additionally, the goods of the parties have no restrictions as to nature, type, channels of trade, or classes of purchasers and are “presumed to
`travel in the same channels of trade to the same class of purchasers.”   In re Viterra Inc., 671 F.3d 1358, 1362, 101 USPQ2d 1905, 1908 (Fed.
`
`Cir. 2012) (quoting Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Packard Press, Inc., 281 F.3d 1261, 1268, 62 USPQ2d 1001, 1005 (Fed. Cir. 2002)).  
`
`In addition the remaining goods and services identified above in Applicant’s identification specifically relate to electric vehicles and are
`
`routinely offered under the same mark as electric vehicles in order to identify a common source and interoperability.  
`
`For example, Tesla and Volkswagen provide electric vehicles, vehicle repairs and maintenance, charging stations, car rental services as well as
`
`information concerning those services and goods.  Please see the attached evidence.  
`
`Thus, because applicant’s and registrant’s goods and services are intrinsically related in nature and are often distributed under the same mark
`and through the same channels of trade the use of similar marks in conjunction with such goods and services is likely to result in confusion.
`
`In conclusion, because the applied-for mark and the registered mark make similar commercial impressions and because the goods and services
`are closely related there is a likelihood of confusion between the two marks and the applied-for mark must be refused registration under
`Trademark Act Section 2(d).
`
`IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS AND SERVICES
`
`The identification of goods and services is indefinite and must be clarified.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01.  Applicant must address
`issues with the following wording:
`
`·       The wording “car audio apparatus” is vague.  Applicant must identify the specific types of audio apparatus by their common commercial
`name.
`·       The word “display” and “monitors” in “Audio and visual equipment for vehicles, namely, radios, audio and video players, televisions,
`displays and speakers”, “Head-up displays for vehicles” and “Rearview monitors for vehicles” is vague.  Applicant must clarify the
`nature of the displays, e.g., video display monitors.
`·       The wording “car navigation systems” is vague because of the word “systems”.   Applicant must either identify the goods by their
`common commercial name or identify the individual components of the system.
`·       The wording “Stands for navigation apparatus” is vague.   Only stands adapted specifically for use with class 9 products fall into class 9.
`·       The wording “Cables for navigation apparatus” is overbroad.   Only data transmission cables and electric cables fall into class 9. 
`·      
`The wording “Devices for electronic toll collecting for automobiles” and “In-vehicle devices for use in electronic toll collection
`systems” is vague.  Applicant must identify the devices by their common commercial name or the specific nature of the devices, e.g.,
`electronic terminals for highway toll collections, wireless receivers and transmitters for toll collecting for automobiles.
`·       The wording “Downloadable computer software featuring electronic maps for navigation purposes” does not clearly identify the function
`of the software.  Applicant may adopt “Downloadable computer software for use in vehicle navigation featuring electronic maps”.
`·       The wording “sensors” is vague.  Applicant must identify the specific types of sensors apparatus by their common commercial name.
`·       The wording “Electronic control units for vehicles”, “Electronic control units for smart keys for vehicles”. “Electronic control units for
`in-vehicle cameras”, “Electronic control units for vehicle batteries” is vague.  Applicant must clearly identify the function of the control
`units, e.g., Electronic control units for vehicles, namely, electronic controls for gasoline engines for land vehicles; Electronic control units
`for vehicles, namely, electronic controllers for remotely controlling the functions of an automobile; Electronic control units for managing
`smart keys for vehicles; Electronic smart key fobs for vehicles being remote control apparatus; Electronic control units for operating in-
`vehicle cameras; Electronic control units for monitoring vehicle batteries.
`·       The wording “Digital panel meters” is vague, applicant must either identify these goods by their common commercial name or more
`clearly identify their function.
`·       The wording “Computer hardware and software for electronic driving assistance systems; Computer hardware and software for e-cockpit
`systems in vehicles; Computer hardware and software for use in scientific and technological data analysis” is vague.  Applicant must
`clearly identify the functions of the software.
`·       The wording “Parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods” in classes 9 and 12 must be clarified because it is indefinite and too broad. 
`See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03.  This wording could identify goods in more than one international class. 
`However, while the word “parts and fittings” alone is generally unacceptable for the reasons identified above, the wording “ replacement
`parts and fittings therefor” or “ structural parts therefor” is acceptable when it follows a definite identification of goods.  See TMEP
`§1402.03(a).
`
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
`

`

`·       The wording “Electric vehicles” is vague.   Applicant must identify the types of electric vehicles by their common commercial name.
`·       The wording “Electronic mirrors for vehicles; Vehicle mirrors” is vague.  Applicant must identify the types of mirrors, e.g., rear view
`mirrors, side view mirrors, etc.
`·       The wording “Client and customer management services and consultancy relating thereto” and “Management of customer information
`and consultancy relating thereto” is vague.   Applicant must clearly identify the nature of these services.
`·       The wording “Data management services” and “Data search via online database and websites for others” is overbroad and vague.  Data
`management services and data search services are classified based on their purpose. Only data management for business purposes fall into
`class 35.
`·       The wording “Rental of lockers” is unacceptably vague because it is unclear whether the rental services identify the rental of storage time
`in lockers or rental of furniture items.
`·       The wording “Providing information relating to the operation and location of vehicles” identifies services which fall into more than one
`international class.  Information services are classified based on their purpose.  Tracking the location of vehicles for business purposes is
`a class 35 services while providing instruction regarding the operation of vehicles is an educational service in class 41.  Applicant
`therefore must clarify the nature and purpose of the services and classify them appropriately. 
`·       The wording “Providing records and information relating to the location of freight and goods” is vague and does not clearly identify a
`service.  Applicant must either identify the services by their common commercial name or clearly identify the purpose of the services. 
`·       The wording “Packaging and sorting of freight and goods” is overbroad.  Packaging and sorting services only fall into class 39 when
`done as preparation for transit.
`·       The wording “Providing information relating to the freight brokerage” is unacceptable because it implies that applicant is providing
`information regarding its own freight brokerage services through the use of the word “the”.   These type of information services are not
`registrable.  Trademark Act Sections 1, 2, 3, and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051-1053, 1127; see TMEP §§1301.01 et seq.   Applicant may clarify
`that the information services concern freight brokerage services more generally.
`·       The wording “parking services” is vague.   Applicant may adopt “vehicle parking services” or “parking garage services”, if accurate.
`·       The wording “Parking management services” is overbroad and may identify services in more than one international class.  Business
`management services of vehicle parking businesses or structures fall into class 35, while offering vehicle parking businesses or structures
`are services in class 39.
`·       The wording “Technical advice relating to operation of computers, automobiles and other machines, apparatus and instruments” is
`vague.  First, applicant must identify the types of apparatus and instruments.  In addition applicant must clarify the nature of the technical
`advice services regarding the operation of automobiles and other machines, apparatus and instruments.
`·       The wording “Cloud computing” is vague.  Applicant must identify the specific nature of the cloud computing services.  If the cloud
`computing services involve the provision of non-downloadable software applicant must identify the functions of the software.
`·       The wording “Computer data processing” identifies services which fall into more than one international class.  Data processing services
`generally fall into class 35, not class 42.
`·       The wording “Scientific and technological data analysis” is vague and does not clearly identify a service.  Applicant must either identify
`the services by their common commercial name or clearly identify the purpose and field of the services. 
`·       The wording “Monitoring of computer systems by remote access” is unacceptably vague because computer system monitoring services
`are classified based on their purpose.  Applicant may adopt “monitoring of computer systems by remote access to ensure proper
`functioning” in class 42, if accurate.
`The wording “Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for use in transportation services” and “; Providing
`temporary use of online non-downloadable software for use in scientific and technological data analysis; Providing temporary use of
`online non-downloadable software” does not clearly identify the functionality of the software.  Applicant must identify the functions of
`the software as well as their field of use, if accurate.
`·       The wording “Security monitoring services” is overbroad because it may identify computer security services in class 42, not class 45. 
`Applicant must specify the types of security monitoring services, e.g., monitoring of security alarms, home security alarm monitoring,
`etc.
`·       The wording “Providing information relating to the location of power charging stations for electric vehicles” in class 45 appears to be
`misclassified.  Information services are classified based on their purpose.  “Providing consumer information regarding the location of
`power charging stations for electric vehicles” is acceptable in class 35.
`In addition the identification contains parentheses.  Generally, applicants should not use parentheses or brackets in identifications in their
`applications so as to avoid confusion with the USPTO’s practice of using parentheses and brackets in registrations to indicate goods
`and/or services that have been deleted from registrations or in an affidavit of incontestability to indicate goods and/or services not
`claimed.  See TMEP §1402.12.  Therefore, applicant must remove the parentheses from the identification and incorporate any
`parenthetical or bracketed information into the description of the goods and/or services.
`
`·      
`
`·      
`
`Applicant may adopt the following identification, if accurate:  
`
`Class 9: Batteries; Electric batteries for vehicles; Electric batteries for electric vehicles; Battery chargers; Battery chargers for electric
`vehicles; Power amplifiers for automotive audio system; Car audio apparatus, namely, [applicant must identify the types of goods by their
`common commercial name]; Audio and visual equipment for vehicles, namely, radios, audio and video players, televisions, video display
`
` 
`

`

`monitors and speakers; Rearview cameras for vehicles; Rearview video monitors for vehicles; Speakers for automotive audio and video
`systems; Subwoofers for automotive audio and video systems; In-vehicle cameras; Navigation apparatus for vehicles in the form of on-
`board computers; Car navigation computers; Mobile computer terminals for navigation; Protection films for use on screens of navigation
`apparatus; Remote controllers for navigation apparatus; Stands adapted for navigation apparatus; electric charging cables for navigation
`apparatus; Wireless receivers and transmitters for toll collecting for automobiles; Downloadable computer software for use in vehicle
`navigation featuring electronic maps; Vehicle detectors for use in electronic toll collection systems; In-vehicle devices in the nature of an
`encoded electronic chip cards for use in electronic toll collection; Electric sensors; Computer hardware and software for operation and
`control of autonomous-driving vehicles; Electronic control units for vehicles, namely, electronic controls for gasoline engines for land
`vehicles; Electronic control units for vehicles, namely, electronic controllers for remotely controlling the functions of an automobile;
`Electronic control units for managing smart keys for vehicles; Electronic smart key fobs for vehicles being remote control apparatus;
`Electronic control units for operating in-vehicle cameras; Integrated dynamics-control modules for electronic control of vehicles;
`Electronic control units for monitoring vehicle batteries; Heads-up displays for vehicles in the nature of transparent electronic displays for
`use in projection of data from a mobile device onto a vehicle windshield; Sonars; Digital panel meters, namely, an electronic instrument
`that displays an input signal in either a digital or analog form; Computer hardware and software for [indicate function e.g.,  operating]
`electronic driving assistance systems; Computer hardware and software for [indicate function e.g.,   operating] e-cockpit systems in
`vehicles; Computer software for use in the automated scheduling and dispatch of vehicles; Display monitors for providing an all-around
`view for a vehicle; Car antennas; Replacement parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods
`
`Class 12: Electric vehicles, namely, [applicant must identify the types of vehicles by their common commercial name, e.g., electric bikes,
`electric automobiles, etc.]; Automobiles; Motors and engines for land vehicles; Electric motors for land vehicles; Motorcycles;
`Autonomous emergency brake systems for vehicles; Brake systems for vehicles; Electronic side mirrors for vehicles; Vehicle side mirrors
`and rearview mirrors; Anti-theft devices for vehicles; Drones; Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs); Replacement parts and fittings for all
`the aforesaid goods
`
`Class 35: Data processing services; Marketing research or analysis; Equipment and inventory management services and consultancy
`relating thereto; Client and customer relationship management services and consultancy relating thereto; Compiling of customer data and
`consultancy relating thereto; Data management services for use in [applicant must identify the field of the services, e.g., reporting debt
`collection accounts to a collection agency]; Clerical employment agency services; Systemization of information into computer databases;
`Compilation of information into computer databases; Updating and maintenance of data in computer databases; Business data
`compilation via online databases and websites for others; Business administration and office functions in the field of transport and
`delivery of goods; Business administration and office functions in the field of payment of goods; Telephone operator services; Business
`administration and office functions in the field of data processing services; Business management and administration in the field of car
`sharing services; Business management and administration in the field of leasing of automobiles; locating and monitoring the operations
`of vehicles of business purposes; Providing information concerning the tracking and location of freight and goods in transit for business
`inventory purposes; Providing consumer information regarding the location of power charging stations for electric vehicles
`
`Class 37: Repair or maintenance of vehicles; Installation, repair and maintenance of computers and computer peripherals; Installation,
`repair or maintenance of transport and storage containers; Installation, repair or maintenance of lockers; Repair or maintenance of
`automobiles; Battery charging service for motor vehicles; Repair or maintenance of automobiles; Car maintenance
`
`Class 39: Car transport; Vehicle rental; GPS navigation services; Rental of navigational systems; Storage and delivery of goods; Parcel
`delivery; Transportation information ; Rental of transport and storage containers; Rental of storage space in lockers; Vehicle-driving
`services; Providing information regarding booking for transportation services via a website; Packaging and sorting of goods for
`transportation; Providing information relating to the collection, shipment and storage of freight and goods; Freight brokerage; Online
`freight brokerage services; Providing information relating to freight brokerages; Cargo unloading; Brokerage services relating to rental of
`automatically-controlled lockers for receiving parcels; Providing information relating to rental of automatically-controlled lockers for
`receiving parcels; Rental of automobiles for car sharing services; Car rental; Electricity distribution for electric vehicles; Parking services
`for car sharing services; Vehicle parking services; Parking management services for car sharing services; Parking garage services;
`Transport of tourists; Providing road and traffic information; Rental of bicycles
`
`Class 42: Computer software design; Computer programming; Maintenance of computer software; Computer system design;
`Configuration of computer systems; Technical advice relating to operation of computers; Cartography and mapping services; Technical
`advice relating to operation and control of autonomous-driving vehicles; Design, development and maintenance of computer systems and
`software for operation and control of autonomous-driving vehicles; Software as a service (SaaS) for operation and control of autonomous-
`driving vehicles; Cloud computing featuring nondownloadable software for use in [applicant must identify the functions of the software,
`e.g., software for operating autonomous-driving vehicles]; Cartography and mapping by survey; Computer data encryption and decoding
`services; Scientific and technological data analysis, namely, [applicant must identify the types of data analysis or analysis services];
`monitoring of computer systems by remote access to ensure proper functioning; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable
`software for locating the position of vehicles for use in transportation services, transportation booking services and vehicle dispatch
`services; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for use in scientific and technological data analysis, namely,
`[applicant must identify the functions of the software]; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software, namely, software
`for [applicant must identify the functions of the software];
`
` 
` 
` 
` 
` 
`

`

`Class 45: Security guarding for facilities; Monitoring of security alarms; Personal body guarding; Night guards
`
`Applicant may amend the identification to clarify or limit the goods and/or se